# Agent 37 vs Apify

Agent 37 records 180,030 monthly visits with +24.2% month-over-month growth and Free Trial, Contact for Pricing pricing. Apify records 4,147,762 monthly visits with +3.9% growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Agent 37](https://openaitools.app/tool/agent-37) | [Apify](https://openaitools.app/tool/apify) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.agent37.com | https://www.apify.com |
| Categories | AI Coaching, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, Large Language Models (LLMs) | AI Web Scraping, AI Agent, AI API, AI Developer Tools |
| Pricing Model | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Freemium, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 180,030 | 4,147,762 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +24.2% | +3.9% |
| Primary Market | Paraguay | United States |
| Direct Visits | 72,672 | 1,816,433 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 6 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Agent 37

Agent 37 is a cloud infrastructure product aimed at people who need somewhere real for AI agents to run. Instead of a chat window, every customer gets a sandbox: an isolated Linux container with CPU, memory, persistent disk, an optional public HTTPS URL, and outbound network access. The company positions itself primarily on price, claiming its sandboxes cost roughly 94% less than most competing providers and publishing a comparison table against AWS, Daytona, E2B, Modal, Vercel, and others. Billing is prepaid and metered by the minute — vCPU, memory, and disk each have their own unit rate — with no subscription fee.

Beyond raw compute, Agent 37 ships a layer of agent-specific conveniences. You can start from a ready-made harness such as Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, OpenCode, or Hermes, or bring your own Docker image. Agents keep their files across sleep, stop and restart cycles, and can be given cron schedules so they run unattended and simply report results. Model access can come from the platform gateway (Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, Grok) or from your own API keys, and integrations cover services such as Gmail, Slack, Notion, and GitHub through a Composio-based connector catalog, plus metered access to paid tools like web scraping and people/company data.

Security is a major part of the pitch: sandboxes are isolated with gVisor, hosts have no public hostname, ingress goes through Cloudflare with API-key authentication, and outbound traffic is restricted to the public internet. The company states it does not collect prompts, files, or terminal sessions, holds SOC 2 Type I, and is working toward Type II. It also offers startup credits and a free personal agent tier for individuals who just want an agent of their own.

**Pricing & Plans:** Prepaid, pay-as-you-go compute metered per minute with no subscription or minimum. New accounts get a $5 starter credit once a card is on file, and the company advertises up to $10,000 in credits for startups. Exact unit rates are published on the pricing page and change over time, so confirm current figures there.

- **Per-minute sandbox billing:** Pay for vCPU, memory and disk separately while the sandbox runs; when it sleeps or is deleted the compute meter stops and you are left with disk cost only.
- **Ready-made agent harnesses:** Launch Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, OpenCode, Hermes, Grok or your own Docker image, each in its own tenant-isolated sandbox.
- **Persistent workspace and scheduling:** Files survive sleep, restarts and weeks of inactivity, and agents can be attached to cron-style schedules so work runs unattended.
- **Networking and custom domains:** Expose individual ports publicly, attach your own domain, or keep everything behind an API key on an authenticated URL.
- **Integrations and metered tools:** Connect 1,000+ apps such as Gmail, Slack, Notion and GitHub, and buy one-off capabilities like scraping or enrichment from the same balance.

**Strengths:** Aggressively low per-minute pricing with an explicit public comparison against major sandbox providers; Persistent disk and scheduling make it suitable for real agent workloads rather than one-shot tasks; Strong isolation story (gVisor, firewalled egress, no public hostnames) plus SOC 2 Type I; Flexible model and tool sourcing: platform gateway, bring-your-own keys, or pay-per-use tools

**Limitations:** Prepaid balance model means you must top up in advance and monitor spend across many sandboxes; Persona pricing and plan details are only available after contacting the team for the white-label and enterprise tracks; Documentation and benchmark claims are largely self-published, so independent verification is limited

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/agent-37.md)

## Apify

Apify started as a general-purpose web automation cloud and has grown into one of the largest marketplaces of turnkey web data extractors. The platform exposes a store of Actors — small containerized programs built by Apify and by third-party developers — that handle jobs like pulling Google Maps listings, TikTok videos, Instagram posts, Amazon prices, or crawling a documentation site into clean Markdown for a RAG pipeline. Each Actor runs on Apify's cloud, can be triggered from an API, scheduled on a recurring basis, and wired into downstream storage or applications.\n\nBecause running scrapers in production is mostly an infrastructure problem, Apify bundles the unglamorous parts: rotating residential and datacenter proxies, browser fingerprinting and anti-blocking, retry logic, dataset and key-value storage, and monitoring. Developers who would rather write their own code can build Actors with the Apify SDK in Python or JavaScript, or use Crawlee, Apify's open-source crawling and browser-automation library, which works with Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium, and BeautifulSoup.\n\nRecently the platform has positioned itself around AI: the Apify MCP server and CLI let AI agents and assistants discover and call Actors as tools, and the Website Content Crawler Actor is explicitly designed to feed LLM applications and vector databases. Pricing follows a freemium model with monthly platform credits, pay-per-usage pricing for many Actors, and custom enterprise agreements.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium: a free plan with monthly usage credits, paid subscription tiers that scale credits and concurrency, consumption-based charges for many marketplace Actors, and custom enterprise pricing. Developer payouts are also available for published Actors.

- **Actor marketplace:** Over one hundred thousand ready-to-run scrapers and automation tools covering social media, maps, e-commerce, real estate, and general web crawling.
- **MCP server and CLI:** Connect Apify Actors directly to AI assistants and agents so they can search the store, run scrapers, and pull structured results as tool calls.
- **Anti-blocking and proxy infrastructure:** Managed proxy rotation and unblocking are built into the platform, so scrapers keep working when target sites add defenses.
- **Crawlee and the Apify SDK:** An open-source crawling library plus Python and JavaScript SDKs for building custom Actors with Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium, or Cheerio.
- **Scheduling, storage, and integrations:** Recurring runs, dataset exports to CSV/JSON/Excel, webhooks, and integrations with LangChain, LlamaIndex, Zapier, and thousands of apps.

**Strengths:** Enormous library of maintained scrapers means many jobs need no code at all; Infrastructure concerns like proxies, retries, and blocking are handled for you; Agent-ready through MCP, CLI, and API, with LangChain and LlamaIndex integrations; Generous free tier for testing plus a developer revenue-share program

**Limitations:** Costs scale with usage, so high-volume scraping can get expensive quickly; Quality varies between community-built Actors and first-party ones; Target sites change frequently, so some Actors break or need updating over time

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/apify.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Agent 37 and Apify compare in monthly traffic?

Agent 37 has 180,030 monthly visits, while Apify has 4,147,762. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Agent 37 has a month-over-month growth rate of +24.2%; Apify has +3.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Agent 37: Free Trial, Contact for Pricing. Prepaid, pay-as-you-go compute metered per minute with no subscription or minimum. New accounts get a $5 starter credit once a card is on file, and the company advertises up to $10,000 in credits for startups. Exact unit rates are published on the pricing page and change over time, so confirm current figures there. Apify: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Freemium: a free plan with monthly usage credits, paid subscription tiers that scale credits and concurrency, consumption-based charges for many marketplace Actors, and custom enterprise pricing. Developer payouts are also available for published Actors.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [n8n](https://openaitools.app/tool/n8n) | 4,522,449 | -7.4% | Freemium | Open-source workflow automation built for AI agents and technical teams | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/n8n.md) |
| 2 | [RunPod](https://openaitools.app/tool/runpod) | 2,881,043 | +5.9% | Paid | The AI developer cloud for GPU pods, serverless inference and clustering | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/runpod.md) |
| 3 | [Firecrawl](https://openaitools.app/tool/firecrawl-dev) | 1,828,239 | -1.9% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Provides direct LLM-ready markdown conversion via API, but lacks Apify's massive marketplace of pre-built scraping actors. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/firecrawl-dev.md) |
| 4 | [Clay](https://openaitools.app/tool/clay-2-0) | 1,267,465 | -2.7% | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Build GTM systems that turn data into revenue | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/clay-2-0.md) |
| 5 | [Modal](https://openaitools.app/tool/modal-com) | 1,196,021 | +30.2% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Runs serverless Python containers optimized for AI model inference and batch jobs rather than persistent agent sandboxes. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/modal-com.md) |
| 6 | [Bright Data](https://openaitools.app/tool/bright-data) | 802,752 | -5.9% | Free Trial, Paid | Offers enterprise-grade proxy networks and raw web data infrastructure, but lacks Apify's plug-and-play actor marketplace. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/bright-data.md) |
| 7 | [Gumloop](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop) | 379,557 | -21.1% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Automates complex business workflows with AI agents, but is less specialized for raw large-scale web scraping actors. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop.md) |
| 8 | [Browserbase](https://openaitools.app/tool/browserbase) | 283,597 | -8% | Freemium | Cloud browsers and web APIs for AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/browserbase.md) |
| 9 | [PhantomBuster](https://openaitools.app/tool/phantombuster) | 279,012 | -10.1% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid | Focuses heavily on pre-built social media automation and lead generation workflows rather than general web scraping. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/phantombuster.md) |
| 10 | [Octoparse](https://openaitools.app/tool/octoparse) | 184,251 | +1.2% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Uses visual point-and-click scraping workflows instead of Apify's developer-centric actor ecosystem and cloud execution. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/octoparse.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/agent-37-vs-apify

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)