# Agent 37 vs Arize AI

Agent 37 records 180,030 monthly visits with +24.2% month-over-month growth and Free Trial, Contact for Pricing pricing. Arize AI records 249,028 monthly visits with +3.2% growth and Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Agent 37](https://openaitools.app/tool/agent-37) | [Arize AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/arize-com) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.agent37.com | https://arize.com |
| Categories | AI Coaching, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, Large Language Models (LLMs) | Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Agent, AI Monitor, AI Developer Tools |
| Pricing Model | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Paid, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 180,030 | 249,028 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +24.2% | +3.2% |
| Primary Market | Paraguay | United States |
| Direct Visits | 72,672 | 107,838 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 1 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Agent 37

Agent 37 is a cloud infrastructure product aimed at people who need somewhere real for AI agents to run. Instead of a chat window, every customer gets a sandbox: an isolated Linux container with CPU, memory, persistent disk, an optional public HTTPS URL, and outbound network access. The company positions itself primarily on price, claiming its sandboxes cost roughly 94% less than most competing providers and publishing a comparison table against AWS, Daytona, E2B, Modal, Vercel, and others. Billing is prepaid and metered by the minute — vCPU, memory, and disk each have their own unit rate — with no subscription fee.

Beyond raw compute, Agent 37 ships a layer of agent-specific conveniences. You can start from a ready-made harness such as Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, OpenCode, or Hermes, or bring your own Docker image. Agents keep their files across sleep, stop and restart cycles, and can be given cron schedules so they run unattended and simply report results. Model access can come from the platform gateway (Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, Grok) or from your own API keys, and integrations cover services such as Gmail, Slack, Notion, and GitHub through a Composio-based connector catalog, plus metered access to paid tools like web scraping and people/company data.

Security is a major part of the pitch: sandboxes are isolated with gVisor, hosts have no public hostname, ingress goes through Cloudflare with API-key authentication, and outbound traffic is restricted to the public internet. The company states it does not collect prompts, files, or terminal sessions, holds SOC 2 Type I, and is working toward Type II. It also offers startup credits and a free personal agent tier for individuals who just want an agent of their own.

**Pricing & Plans:** Prepaid, pay-as-you-go compute metered per minute with no subscription or minimum. New accounts get a $5 starter credit once a card is on file, and the company advertises up to $10,000 in credits for startups. Exact unit rates are published on the pricing page and change over time, so confirm current figures there.

- **Per-minute sandbox billing:** Pay for vCPU, memory and disk separately while the sandbox runs; when it sleeps or is deleted the compute meter stops and you are left with disk cost only.
- **Ready-made agent harnesses:** Launch Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, OpenCode, Hermes, Grok or your own Docker image, each in its own tenant-isolated sandbox.
- **Persistent workspace and scheduling:** Files survive sleep, restarts and weeks of inactivity, and agents can be attached to cron-style schedules so work runs unattended.
- **Networking and custom domains:** Expose individual ports publicly, attach your own domain, or keep everything behind an API key on an authenticated URL.
- **Integrations and metered tools:** Connect 1,000+ apps such as Gmail, Slack, Notion and GitHub, and buy one-off capabilities like scraping or enrichment from the same balance.

**Strengths:** Aggressively low per-minute pricing with an explicit public comparison against major sandbox providers; Persistent disk and scheduling make it suitable for real agent workloads rather than one-shot tasks; Strong isolation story (gVisor, firewalled egress, no public hostnames) plus SOC 2 Type I; Flexible model and tool sourcing: platform gateway, bring-your-own keys, or pay-per-use tools

**Limitations:** Prepaid balance model means you must top up in advance and monitor spend across many sandboxes; Persona pricing and plan details are only available after contacting the team for the white-label and enterprise tracks; Documentation and benchmark claims are largely self-published, so independent verification is limited

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/agent-37.md)

## Arize AI

Arize is an AI engineering platform built for teams that run generative AI in production. It is split into two products: Arize AX, a managed environment for agent observability, evaluation, and experimentation, and Phoenix, an open-source tracing and evaluation library that teams can self-host when they need full data control. Both rely on OpenInference, the open-source semantic convention for generative AI tracing that the Arize team founded and that is built on OpenTelemetry.

The workflow follows three questions. Observe answers what an agent actually did by capturing every span, trace, and session; Evaluate answers whether quality is improving or regressing using span-level, trace-level, and session-level evals; Learn answers whether a proposed change will help by letting teams test prompts and harnesses before rollout. A datastore for GenAI traces (ADB) keeps data in open formats that connect to warehouses such as BigQuery, Databricks, and Snowflake, and an in-app AI engineering agent named Alyx surfaces issues and drafts review-ready fixes.

The platform integrates with dozens of models, frameworks, and tools, including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Amazon Bedrock, LangChain, LangGraph, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, and DSPy. Arize publishes compliance certifications including SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR, and supports cloud, hybrid, and self-hosted deployment.

**Pricing & Plans:** Arize uses a paid model with a free entry point: teams can start free or book a demo, while enterprise-scale usage, deployment options, and support are quoted through a contact-sales process. The open-source Phoenix project is free to self-host.

- **End-to-end tracing:** Capture spans, traces, and sessions across agents and LLM calls using OpenInference conventions built on OpenTelemetry, so instrumentation stays portable.
- **Scalable evaluation framework:** Run evaluations at span, trace, and session level to grade retrieval quality, tool use, and final answers across large production datasets.
- **Alyx AI engineering agent:** An in-product agent that inspects traces, diagnoses likely root causes, and proposes fixes that engineers can review before shipping.
- **Phoenix open-source toolkit:** Self-host the leading open-source tracing and eval tool when you need to keep trace data inside your own infrastructure.
- **Warehouse-native trace storage:** ADB stores traces in open formats that connect natively to BigQuery, Databricks, or Snowflake for joint analytics with business data.

**Strengths:** Covers the full loop of observe, evaluate, and improve rather than stopping at dashboards; Backed by OpenInference and OpenTelemetry standards, limiting vendor lock-in on trace formats; Strong enterprise posture with SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR coverage plus self-hosting options; Integrates with a very wide set of models, frameworks, and agent SDKs

**Limitations:** Self-serve pricing is not published, so cost requires a sales conversation; The breadth of features can be overwhelming for small teams shipping their first LLM feature; Full value depends on disciplined instrumentation across the whole application

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/arize-com.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Agent 37 and Arize AI compare in monthly traffic?

Agent 37 has 180,030 monthly visits, while Arize AI has 249,028. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Agent 37 has a month-over-month growth rate of +24.2%; Arize AI has +3.2%.

### How does pricing compare?

Agent 37: Free Trial, Contact for Pricing. Prepaid, pay-as-you-go compute metered per minute with no subscription or minimum. New accounts get a $5 starter credit once a card is on file, and the company advertises up to $10,000 in credits for startups. Exact unit rates are published on the pricing page and change over time, so confirm current figures there. Arize AI: Paid, Contact for Pricing. Arize uses a paid model with a free entry point: teams can start free or book a demo, while enterprise-scale usage, deployment options, and support are quoted through a contact-sales process. The open-source Phoenix project is free to self-host.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [RunPod](https://openaitools.app/tool/runpod) | 2,881,043 | +5.9% | Paid | The AI developer cloud for GPU pods, serverless inference and clustering | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/runpod.md) |
| 2 | [Modal](https://openaitools.app/tool/modal-com) | 1,196,021 | +30.2% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Runs serverless Python containers optimized for AI model inference and batch jobs rather than persistent agent sandboxes. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/modal-com.md) |
| 3 | [Weights & Biases (CoreWeave Forge)](https://openaitools.app/tool/prompts) | 315,624 | -80.2% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing, Free | Excels at experiment tracking and model registry workflows, but is less purpose-built for real-time LLM production observability. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/prompts.md) |
| 4 | [Browserbase](https://openaitools.app/tool/browserbase) | 283,597 | -8% | Freemium | Cloud browsers and web APIs for AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/browserbase.md) |
| 5 | [Coder](https://openaitools.app/tool/coder) | 149,417 | -12.8% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Self-hosted infrastructure platform for provisioning secure cloud development workspaces and governing AI coding agents. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/coder.md) |
| 6 | [Future AGI](https://openaitools.app/tool/future-agi) | 121,741 | -7.8% | Freemium, Usage-based | Includes integrated guardrails and simulation tools, but is less mature for large-scale enterprise production telemetry monitoring. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/future-agi.md) |
| 7 | [Maxim AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/maxim-ai) | 121,351 | +10% | Contact for Pricing, Free Open Source | Features strong testing and prompt evaluation tools, though its monitoring interface is less oriented towards massive telemetry streams. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/maxim-ai.md) |
| 8 | [Thunder Compute](https://openaitools.app/tool/thunder-compute) | 102,147 | -29% | Paid (per-minute instances, per-second sandboxes) | Low-cost cloud GPUs with per-minute instances and per-second sandboxes for AI workloads. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/thunder-compute.md) |
| 9 | [PromptLayer](https://openaitools.app/tool/promptlayer) | 85,899 | -4.6% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Focuses heavily on prompt management and versioning control, whereas Arize prioritizes end-to-end tracing and ML observability. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/promptlayer.md) |
| 10 | [Confident AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/confident-ai) | 83,400 | -3.3% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Offers comprehensive LLM evaluation and unit testing via DeepEval, but lacks Arize's deep production monitoring infrastructure. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/confident-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/agent-37-vs-arize-com

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)