# Agent 37 vs Cursor

Agent 37 records 180,030 monthly visits with +24.2% month-over-month growth and Free Trial, Contact for Pricing pricing. Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Agent 37](https://openaitools.app/tool/agent-37) | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.agent37.com | https://www.cursor.com |
| Categories | AI Coaching, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, Large Language Models (LLMs) | AI Code Assistant, AI Developer Tools, AI Agent |
| Pricing Model | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 180,030 | 23,297,751 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +24.2% | +8.4% |
| Primary Market | Paraguay | United States |
| Direct Visits | 72,672 | 14,683,770 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 4.7 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 29 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Agent 37

Agent 37 is a cloud infrastructure product aimed at people who need somewhere real for AI agents to run. Instead of a chat window, every customer gets a sandbox: an isolated Linux container with CPU, memory, persistent disk, an optional public HTTPS URL, and outbound network access. The company positions itself primarily on price, claiming its sandboxes cost roughly 94% less than most competing providers and publishing a comparison table against AWS, Daytona, E2B, Modal, Vercel, and others. Billing is prepaid and metered by the minute — vCPU, memory, and disk each have their own unit rate — with no subscription fee.

Beyond raw compute, Agent 37 ships a layer of agent-specific conveniences. You can start from a ready-made harness such as Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, OpenCode, or Hermes, or bring your own Docker image. Agents keep their files across sleep, stop and restart cycles, and can be given cron schedules so they run unattended and simply report results. Model access can come from the platform gateway (Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, Grok) or from your own API keys, and integrations cover services such as Gmail, Slack, Notion, and GitHub through a Composio-based connector catalog, plus metered access to paid tools like web scraping and people/company data.

Security is a major part of the pitch: sandboxes are isolated with gVisor, hosts have no public hostname, ingress goes through Cloudflare with API-key authentication, and outbound traffic is restricted to the public internet. The company states it does not collect prompts, files, or terminal sessions, holds SOC 2 Type I, and is working toward Type II. It also offers startup credits and a free personal agent tier for individuals who just want an agent of their own.

**Pricing & Plans:** Prepaid, pay-as-you-go compute metered per minute with no subscription or minimum. New accounts get a $5 starter credit once a card is on file, and the company advertises up to $10,000 in credits for startups. Exact unit rates are published on the pricing page and change over time, so confirm current figures there.

- **Per-minute sandbox billing:** Pay for vCPU, memory and disk separately while the sandbox runs; when it sleeps or is deleted the compute meter stops and you are left with disk cost only.
- **Ready-made agent harnesses:** Launch Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, OpenCode, Hermes, Grok or your own Docker image, each in its own tenant-isolated sandbox.
- **Persistent workspace and scheduling:** Files survive sleep, restarts and weeks of inactivity, and agents can be attached to cron-style schedules so work runs unattended.
- **Networking and custom domains:** Expose individual ports publicly, attach your own domain, or keep everything behind an API key on an authenticated URL.
- **Integrations and metered tools:** Connect 1,000+ apps such as Gmail, Slack, Notion and GitHub, and buy one-off capabilities like scraping or enrichment from the same balance.

**Strengths:** Aggressively low per-minute pricing with an explicit public comparison against major sandbox providers; Persistent disk and scheduling make it suitable for real agent workloads rather than one-shot tasks; Strong isolation story (gVisor, firewalled egress, no public hostnames) plus SOC 2 Type I; Flexible model and tool sourcing: platform gateway, bring-your-own keys, or pay-per-use tools

**Limitations:** Prepaid balance model means you must top up in advance and monitor spend across many sandboxes; Persona pricing and plan details are only available after contacting the team for the white-label and enterprise tracks; Documentation and benchmark claims are largely self-published, so independent verification is limited

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/agent-37.md)

## Cursor

Cursor's editor looks familiar to anyone who has used a modern IDE, but the center of gravity is the agent. Instead of only suggesting the next line, it can read a task description, inspect the repository, produce an implementation plan, modify many files, run commands, and report back with a summary of what changed. Developers keep control by approving plans, reviewing diffs, and stepping in wherever judgment is needed.

The product has expanded well beyond a single application. Cloud agents can run on their own machines for extended periods, Cursor ships a CLI, and integrations bring the same agent into Slack and GitHub so work can be handed off without switching tools. A model picker lets you use frontier models from several providers, or rely on automatic selection per task.

This makes Cursor a good fit for teams that want measurable velocity gains on large codebases while keeping human review in the loop. The trade-offs are mostly about cost and process: capable agents consume quota, remote indexing raises questions for security-conscious organizations, and teams need light conventions for when to delegate versus write code directly.

**Pricing & Plans:** Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

- **Agent-driven code changes:** An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.
- **Cloud and parallel agents:** Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.
- **Tab completion and codebase context:** Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.
- **Multi-model flexibility:** Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.
- **CLI, Slack and GitHub workflows:** Run Cursor from the terminal, chat with it in Slack, and let it review or open pull requests in GitHub without leaving your workflow.

**Strengths:** Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits; Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub; Choose from multiple frontier models in one place; Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors

**Limitations:** Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage; Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively; Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly; Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Agent 37 and Cursor compare in monthly traffic?

Agent 37 has 180,030 monthly visits, while Cursor has 23,297,751. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Agent 37 has a month-over-month growth rate of +24.2%; Cursor has +8.4%.

### How does pricing compare?

Agent 37: Free Trial, Contact for Pricing. Prepaid, pay-as-you-go compute metered per minute with no subscription or minimum. New accounts get a $5 starter credit once a card is on file, and the company advertises up to $10,000 in credits for startups. Exact unit rates are published on the pricing page and change over time, so confirm current figures there. Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 2 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Enables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 3 | [VS Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code) | 7,397,370 | -3.8% | Freemium | Offers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code.md) |
| 4 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 5 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 6 | [RunPod](https://openaitools.app/tool/runpod) | 2,881,043 | +5.9% | Paid | The AI developer cloud for GPU pods, serverless inference and clustering | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/runpod.md) |
| 7 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 8 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 9 | [Modal](https://openaitools.app/tool/modal-com) | 1,196,021 | +30.2% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Runs serverless Python containers optimized for AI model inference and batch jobs rather than persistent agent sandboxes. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/modal-com.md) |
| 10 | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) | 702,366 | -7.8% | Freemium | Delivers a polished AI-native IDE experience with multi-file generation, but has a smaller ecosystem than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/agent-37-vs-cursor

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)