How do their growth rates compare?

AgentR has a month-over-month growth rate of 0%; Humanly has -19.1%.

How does pricing compare?

AgentR: Contact for Pricing. Contact for pricing. AgentR is in private beta with the first role free of charge, including up to 50 applicants and 5 interviews and no card required; pricing for additional roles is provided on request. Humanly: Contact for Pricing. Custom/quote-based pricing. Humanly does not publish public tiers; you book a demo or request a quote, and cost is scoped to your hiring volume and the modules you deploy. No free plan is advertised.

What are alternatives to AgentR and Humanly?

Other tools in related categories include Mercor, Workable, Kula AI, Sense, PyjamaHR.

AgentR vs Humanly — Traffic (445 vs 109.72K), Pricing & Verdict

Open AI Tools

AgentR vs Humanly — Traffic (445 vs 109.72K), Pricing & Verdict | Open AI Tools

Side-by-Side Traffic & Specification Matrix

Dimension / Metric	AgentR	Humanly
Official Domain	agentr.global	humanly.io
Pricing Model	Contact for Pricing	Contact for Pricing
Monthly Visits	445 (445)	109.72K (109,717)
MoM Traffic Delta	+445 (0%)	-25.85K (-19.1%)
Primary Market & Share	🇵🇰 Pakistan (100%)	🇺🇸 United States (66.8%)
Direct Visits / mo	183	50.07K
User Rating	4.1	4.1
Supported Platforms	Website	Website

AgentR

The hiring assistant that reads every application and shows you why

Read and score every application

Rather than ranking only the top of the pile, AgentR reads each application in full and scores it against your criteria, keeping the supporting passages.

Twenty-signal shortlisting

Candidates are ranked on around twenty signals, including career progression and the context of employment gaps, with the evidence behind each score shown.

Claim verification with sources

Every resume claim is checked against the public record and the candidate's own history and assigned a verdict from supported to mismatch, with sources attached.

Structured, rubric-scored interviews

Questions are generated from the role and answers are scored against a rubric written before anyone applied, with the supporting quote attached.

Strengths & Pros

+Reads every application in full rather than truncating the pile at a threshold
+Claim verification keeps the source evidence next to each verdict
+Deliberately avoids automated rejections, keeping every hiring decision with the team
+Proctoring flags are separated from scoring, so suspicion never changes a candidate's number