# API2D vs OfoxAI

API2D records 214 monthly visits with -91.3% month-over-month growth and Paid pricing. OfoxAI records 239,718 monthly visits with +12.7% growth and Flexible pricing.

| Metric | [API2D](https://openaitools.app/tool/api2d-com) | [OfoxAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/ofoxai) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.api2d.com | https://ofox.ai |
| Categories | AI API, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Developer Tools | AI API, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Developer Tools, AI Agent |
| Pricing Model | Paid | Flexible |
| Monthly Visits | 214 | 239,718 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -91.3% | +12.7% |
| Primary Market | Taiwan | China |
| Direct Visits | 86 | 81,890 |
| Review Score | 3.8 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 4 | 2 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## API2D

API2D is a payment-and-routing layer that sits in front of the world's major language and image models. Instead of managing billing with each provider separately, you register an API2D account, top it up, copy the issued key and paste it into any client that supports a custom API base URL. Because the interface mirrors OpenAI's own specification, most existing tools, SDKs and self-hosted chat UIs work without code changes.

The platform bills in points (P) rather than a fixed monthly subscription, so cost tracks actual token consumption. According to API2D's own documentation, overall pricing is kept at roughly 1.5x the underlying provider's official rate, with a minimum per-request charge and free cached responses. Streamed GPT-4 replies are billed differently because they hold a connection open, and media-heavy endpoints add a modest bandwidth fee.

Beyond pure relay, API2D layers on value that a raw endpoint does not offer: response caching, retrieval-augmented search, drawing tools and an agent/reseller program that lets larger accounts create and price their own sub-keys. It is aimed at Chinese-speaking developers and enthusiasts who want frictionless, domestically payable access to frontier models. For anyone evaluating it, remember that API2D is an independent third party and not affiliated with OpenAI, Anthropic or the other model vendors.

**Pricing & Plans:** Pay-as-you-go in points (P); overall cost roughly 1.5x official provider pricing, with free cache hits and a minimum per-call charge. Recharge via WeChat, Alipay, Chinese bank cards or Stripe. Points expire 180 days after your last top-up.

- **OpenAI-compatible endpoint:** One base URL and key work with virtually any app, SDK or self-hosted chat client that supports a custom API address.
- **Multi-provider model access:** Route requests to OpenAI models, Claude, Stability diffusion, Azure TTS and vector database services from a single account.
- **Points-based billing:** Consumption is metered in points with a published multiplier, so you pay for what you use rather than a flat subscription.
- **Free response caching:** Identical request bodies return cached answers for free for 24 hours, and a header can disable caching when freshness matters.
- **Reseller and grouping tools:** Larger accounts can batch-create keys, set default models and resell access through their own pricing pages.

**Strengths:** Works with the large ecosystem of OpenAI-compatible tools out of the box; Point-based billing means low commitment and granular cost control; Response caching can make repeated queries effectively free; Built-in enhancements (search, knowledge base, drawing) go beyond a plain relay

**Limitations:** Cost runs above direct provider pricing once the multiplier applies; Points expire 180 days after the last top-up, so balances need periodic renewal; No monthly plan — heavy users must estimate spend from token usage; Pricing calculation is complex because of minimum charges and bandwidth fees

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/api2d-com.md)

## OfoxAI

OfoxAI is an AI gateway built for developers and teams who want to work with many frontier models without managing many vendor integrations. Instead of juggling separate accounts, SDKs, and invoices from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek, Qwen, ByteDance, MiniMax, and Z.ai, you point one OpenAI-compatible key at OfoxAI and route to any model in the catalog. The platform covers text, image, video, embedding, speech, and transcription models, and it advertises a stated 0% platform fee, meaning you pay the model provider's official list price with automatic volume credits of up to about 7% as usage scales.

Beyond the API, OfoxAI bundles governance and a consumer-grade front end. Teams get roles, per-key and per-member budgets, real-time cost dashboards, and an audit trail, while enterprise accounts unlock a 99.9% uptime SLA with multi-region failover and tiered support. On the data side, prompts and responses are not stored by default and are never used for training, request logging is opt-in and capped, and all traffic is TLS-encrypted. Ofox Desktop connects popular coding tools in one click, so Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, and OpenAI-SDK apps can switch to the gateway by changing the base URL.

Ofox Chat targets non-developer work. It is a pay-as-you-go chat workspace where you can attach files, search the web with cited sources, run code on your data, and produce finished deliverables such as slide decks, reports, spreadsheets, images, and short videos. Every reply shows which model produced it and what it cost, and you can switch models mid-conversation without a subscription.

**Pricing & Plans:** Pay-as-you-go with a stated 0% platform fee: OfoxAI bills at each model provider's official list price, with automatic volume credits of up to about 7% as spend grows and no mandatory monthly subscription. You add credits and pay per token or request, and Ofox Chat works the same way. Enterprise deployments add roles, budgets, an audit trail, a 99.9% uptime SLA, and tiered support; specific credit bundles are not published on the marketing site.

- **One API for 100+ models:** Reach text, image, video, embedding, speech, and transcription models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek, Qwen, GLM, Kimi, and more through one key and one endpoint, with new models added shortly after release.
- **OpenAI, Anthropic and Gemini SDK compatible:** Point your existing OpenAI, Anthropic, or Gemini SDK at ofox.ai's base URL and keep your code. No proprietary client library has to be adopted.
- **Transparent, provider-priced billing:** Pay the model provider's official list price with a stated 0% platform fee, and let automatic volume credits of up to about 7% kick in as spend grows. No monthly subscription is required.
- **Team budgets and cost attribution:** Set daily, monthly, or total budgets per team, member, or API key, with requests blocked over the limit. Dashboards break cost, tokens, and cache usage down by model, key, and member.
- **Zero data retention by default:** Prompts and responses are not stored by default and never used for training. Request logging is opt-in and capped, with credentials redacted, and a 99.9% uptime SLA backs multi-region failover.

**Strengths:** One key and one dashboard replace integrations with dozens of model providers; Officially stated 0% platform fee with provider-level pricing and no monthly subscription; Drop-in compatibility with OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini SDKs; Zero data retention by default and no training on customer prompts

**Limitations:** No traditional monthly subscription — you must top up credits in advance before you can test; Free-trial or starter credit details are not clearly published on the marketing site; Some enterprise certifications (SOC 2 Type II) are still in progress, not yet issued; Model catalog and version names move fast, so docs can lag behind releases

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/ofoxai.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do API2D and OfoxAI compare in monthly traffic?

API2D has 214 monthly visits, while OfoxAI has 239,718. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

API2D has a month-over-month growth rate of -91.3%; OfoxAI has +12.7%.

### How does pricing compare?

API2D: Paid. Pay-as-you-go in points (P); overall cost roughly 1.5x official provider pricing, with free cache hits and a minimum per-call charge. Recharge via WeChat, Alipay, Chinese bank cards or Stripe. Points expire 180 days after your last top-up. OfoxAI: Flexible. Pay-as-you-go with a stated 0% platform fee: OfoxAI bills at each model provider's official list price, with automatic volume credits of up to about 7% as spend grows and no mandatory monthly subscription. You add credits and pay per token or request, and Ofox Chat works the same way. Enterprise deployments add roles, budgets, an audit trail, a 99.9% uptime SLA, and tiered support; specific credit bundles are not published on the marketing site.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Google AI Studio](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-ai-studio) | 112,620,020 | +2% | Freemium | Focuses specifically on native Google Gemini models and prototyping tools rather than multi-provider aggregation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-ai-studio.md) |
| 2 | [OpenRouter](https://openaitools.app/tool/openrouter-ai) | 19,941,437 | -6.2% | Paid | Offers massive model selection and robust routing, but lacks native multi-modal media generation endpoints. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/openrouter-ai.md) |
| 3 | [OrcaRouter](https://openaitools.app/tool/orcarouter) | 975,300 | -5.2% | Freemium | One OpenAI-compatible gateway for adaptive LLM routing, guardrails, and spend control | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/orcarouter.md) |
| 4 | [Atlas Cloud](https://openaitools.app/tool/atlas-cloud) | 777,031 | -16.4% | Paid | Extends text routing with robust media inference endpoints, but has a different pricing structure. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/atlas-cloud.md) |
| 5 | [CometAPI](https://openaitools.app/tool/cometapi) | 602,966 | +49.7% | Pay-as-you-go (credits) | Provides access to 500+ models under an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, but with less community documentation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cometapi.md) |
| 6 | [LiteLLM](https://openaitools.app/tool/litellm) | 576,967 | +7.9% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Provides self-hostable open-source proxy and Python SDK, but requires manual server setup and API keys. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/litellm.md) |
| 7 | [ZenMux](https://openaitools.app/tool/zenmux) | 444,394 | +16.7% | Freemium, Paid | Combines a unified LLM API gateway with a built-in multi-model chat interface for testing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/zenmux.md) |
| 8 | [EvoLink AI Model API](https://openaitools.app/tool/evolink-ai-model-api) | 312,573 | -27% | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | One API for LLM, image, video, and audio models in production | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/evolink-ai-model-api.md) |
| 9 | [AiHubMix](https://openaitools.app/tool/aihubmix) | 238,455 | -16.1% | Contact for Pricing | Provides similar unified OpenAI-compatible routing for diverse LLMs, with automated failover and discounted pricing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/aihubmix.md) |
| 10 | [AI/ML API](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-ml-api) | 232,946 | -20.1% | Pay-as-you-go credits (free to start); enterprise custom pricing on request | Aggregates hundreds of foundational models and agent tools, focusing on multi-vendor developer integration. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-ml-api.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/api2d-com-vs-ofoxai

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)