# Apify vs Termo

Apify records 4,147,762 monthly visits with +3.9% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing. Termo records 4,136 monthly visits with -49% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Apify](https://openaitools.app/tool/apify) | [Termo](https://openaitools.app/tool/termo) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.apify.com | https://termo.ai |
| Categories | AI Web Scraping, AI Agent, AI API, AI Developer Tools | AI Agent, AI Assistant, AI Code Generator, AI Research Tool |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 4,147,762 | 4,136 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +3.9% | -49% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 1,816,433 | 1,625 |
| Review Score | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 6 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Apify

Apify started as a general-purpose web automation cloud and has grown into one of the largest marketplaces of turnkey web data extractors. The platform exposes a store of Actors — small containerized programs built by Apify and by third-party developers — that handle jobs like pulling Google Maps listings, TikTok videos, Instagram posts, Amazon prices, or crawling a documentation site into clean Markdown for a RAG pipeline. Each Actor runs on Apify's cloud, can be triggered from an API, scheduled on a recurring basis, and wired into downstream storage or applications.\n\nBecause running scrapers in production is mostly an infrastructure problem, Apify bundles the unglamorous parts: rotating residential and datacenter proxies, browser fingerprinting and anti-blocking, retry logic, dataset and key-value storage, and monitoring. Developers who would rather write their own code can build Actors with the Apify SDK in Python or JavaScript, or use Crawlee, Apify's open-source crawling and browser-automation library, which works with Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium, and BeautifulSoup.\n\nRecently the platform has positioned itself around AI: the Apify MCP server and CLI let AI agents and assistants discover and call Actors as tools, and the Website Content Crawler Actor is explicitly designed to feed LLM applications and vector databases. Pricing follows a freemium model with monthly platform credits, pay-per-usage pricing for many Actors, and custom enterprise agreements.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium: a free plan with monthly usage credits, paid subscription tiers that scale credits and concurrency, consumption-based charges for many marketplace Actors, and custom enterprise pricing. Developer payouts are also available for published Actors.

- **Actor marketplace:** Over one hundred thousand ready-to-run scrapers and automation tools covering social media, maps, e-commerce, real estate, and general web crawling.
- **MCP server and CLI:** Connect Apify Actors directly to AI assistants and agents so they can search the store, run scrapers, and pull structured results as tool calls.
- **Anti-blocking and proxy infrastructure:** Managed proxy rotation and unblocking are built into the platform, so scrapers keep working when target sites add defenses.
- **Crawlee and the Apify SDK:** An open-source crawling library plus Python and JavaScript SDKs for building custom Actors with Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium, or Cheerio.
- **Scheduling, storage, and integrations:** Recurring runs, dataset exports to CSV/JSON/Excel, webhooks, and integrations with LangChain, LlamaIndex, Zapier, and thousands of apps.

**Strengths:** Enormous library of maintained scrapers means many jobs need no code at all; Infrastructure concerns like proxies, retries, and blocking are handled for you; Agent-ready through MCP, CLI, and API, with LangChain and LlamaIndex integrations; Generous free tier for testing plus a developer revenue-share program

**Limitations:** Costs scale with usage, so high-volume scraping can get expensive quickly; Quality varies between community-built Actors and first-party ones; Target sites change frequently, so some Actors break or need updating over time

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/apify.md)

## Termo

Termo is built around a simple premise: an AI assistant that only exists inside a chat window is not much of an assistant. In Termo, every agent gets its own virtual machine plus a persistent semantic memory graph. That combination lets an agent keep working when you close the tab — running a scheduled competitor scan, a weekly digest, or a long web-scraping job — and then report back with what changed since last time.

The memory layer is what separates it from prompt-and-response tools. Memories are typed — identity, preference, fact, project, skill, user profile — and grow as the agent works, so instructions like "track AI papers and email me a digest" carry context forward indefinitely. Running alongside that is an execution layer: agents can run shell commands, browse and scrape the web, execute Python, call APIs, and install new skills on the fly from a registry the company puts at over 10,000 entries. Beyond solo work, an agent can spawn sub-agents to research and draft in parallel, then merge their output, and it can build and host small applications — dashboards, trackers — on a custom subdomain using live data.

The service is in beta. There is a free tier with a renewable usage allowance, then Pro at $19.99/month, Premium at $49.99/month and Business at $99.99/month, scaling agents, concurrent runs, schedules and total usage. Every tier includes memory, built-in tools, Telegram, custom subdomains and file management; scheduled runs can consume up to half of an allowance. Termo is developed by Tanic Labs.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with published monthly tiers. Free: $0 with a small renewable usage allowance, 1 agent, 1 concurrent run and 1 daily schedule. Pro: $19.99/month with 1× usage, 3 agents, 2 concurrent runs, 5 schedules and browser tools. Premium: $49.99/month with 2.5× Pro usage, 5 agents, 3 concurrent runs and 15 schedules. Business: $99.99/month with 5× Pro usage, 10 agents, 5 concurrent runs and 50 schedules. All plans include memory, tools, Telegram, custom subdomains and file management; usage is shared across agents and schedules may use up to 50% of an allowance.

- **On-demand skills and real execution:** Agents run shell commands, scrape pages, call APIs and use packages, installing new skills from a repository of more than 10,000 as tasks demand.
- **Semantic memory that compounds:** Every conversation and finding is stored in a semantic memory graph spanning identity, preferences, facts, projects and skills, so agents build expertise over time instead of restarting each session.
- **Plain-language scheduled automation:** Describe a cadence in chat and the agent saves the context, registers the autonomous run and executes on schedule — daily, weekly, or to a cron-style pattern — even while you are offline.
- **Multi-agent orchestration:** One agent can orchestrate others: it spawns sub-agents, delegates research and writing in parallel, then merges the results into a single deliverable.
- **Builds and hosts web apps:** Ask for a dashboard, tracker or small internal tool and the agent writes the files, pulls live data and serves the result on a custom subdomain.

**Strengths:** Free tier is genuinely usable for a first agent rather than a demo; Persistent typed memory makes long-running tasks far more useful than a stateless chatbot; Scheduled runs plus real code execution means the agent can work unsupervised; Sub-agent delegation handles multi-step research and drafting in one prompt

**Limitations:** Still labeled beta, so expect rough edges and occasional service issues; Usage-based allowances shared across agents make heavy always-on automation costly at higher tiers; No dedicated mobile app yet — interaction is through the web app and Telegram-style channels

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/termo.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Apify and Termo compare in monthly traffic?

Apify has 4,147,762 monthly visits, while Termo has 4,136. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Apify has a month-over-month growth rate of +3.9%; Termo has -49%.

### How does pricing compare?

Apify: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Freemium: a free plan with monthly usage credits, paid subscription tiers that scale credits and concurrency, consumption-based charges for many marketplace Actors, and custom enterprise pricing. Developer payouts are also available for published Actors. Termo: Freemium. Freemium with published monthly tiers. Free: $0 with a small renewable usage allowance, 1 agent, 1 concurrent run and 1 daily schedule. Pro: $19.99/month with 1× usage, 3 agents, 2 concurrent runs, 5 schedules and browser tools. Premium: $49.99/month with 2.5× Pro usage, 5 agents, 3 concurrent runs and 15 schedules. Business: $99.99/month with 5× Pro usage, 10 agents, 5 concurrent runs and 50 schedules. All plans include memory, tools, Telegram, custom subdomains and file management; usage is shared across agents and schedules may use up to 50% of an allowance.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Muse](https://openaitools.app/tool/muse-ai-1) | 45,751,822 | +228.3% | Contact for Pricing | Your personal AI agent from Meta that actually gets things done | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/muse-ai-1.md) |
| 2 | [Manus](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus) | 19,195,779 | -1.7% | Free Trial | A general-purpose AI agent that executes tasks, not just answers them | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus.md) |
| 3 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Describe your idea and Replit builds a working app in minutes | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 4 | [n8n](https://openaitools.app/tool/n8n) | 4,522,449 | -7.4% | Freemium | Open-source workflow automation built for AI agents and technical teams | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/n8n.md) |
| 5 | [Hermes-Agent](https://openaitools.app/tool/hermes-agent-1) | 3,638,741 | -5.4% | Freemium | A free, open-source personal AI agent that learns your projects and works across every messaging app. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/hermes-agent-1.md) |
| 6 | [Firecrawl](https://openaitools.app/tool/firecrawl-dev) | 1,828,239 | -1.9% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Provides direct LLM-ready markdown conversion via API, but lacks Apify's massive marketplace of pre-built scraping actors. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/firecrawl-dev.md) |
| 7 | [Clay](https://openaitools.app/tool/clay-2-0) | 1,267,465 | -2.7% | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Build GTM systems that turn data into revenue | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/clay-2-0.md) |
| 8 | [Bright Data](https://openaitools.app/tool/bright-data) | 802,752 | -5.9% | Free Trial, Paid | Offers enterprise-grade proxy networks and raw web data infrastructure, but lacks Apify's plug-and-play actor marketplace. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/bright-data.md) |
| 9 | [MiniMax Agent](https://openaitools.app/tool/minimax-agent) | 679,573 | +2.8% | Freemium | An AI supercompanion that handles tasks, code and creative work end to end | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/minimax-agent.md) |
| 10 | [ego (lite)](https://openaitools.app/tool/ego-lite) | 384,099 | +97.6% | Free | Free browser that lets AI agents run parallel web automation with your own logins | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ego-lite.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/apify-vs-termo

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)