# AProxy vs Cursor

AProxy records 36,540 monthly visits with -41.4% month-over-month growth and Free Trial, Paid pricing. Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [AProxy](https://openaitools.app/tool/aproxy) | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://aproxy.com/?keyword=unw8l6dq | https://www.cursor.com |
| Categories | AI Web Scraping, AI For Data Analytics, AI Developer Tools, AI API | AI Code Assistant, AI Developer Tools, AI Agent |
| Pricing Model | Free Trial, Paid | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 36,540 | 23,297,751 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -41.4% | +8.4% |
| Primary Market | Brazil | United States |
| Direct Visits | 15,256 | 14,683,770 |
| Review Score | 4.1 | 4.7 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 29 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## AProxy

AProxy sells access to a global proxy network and the tooling needed to use that network productively. The core offering is a pool of more than 70 million residential IPs spanning 195+ countries, with sub-second connection times and 99.9% availability claims. Around that pool the company layers several IP classes: rotating residential proxies for sensitive scraping targets, longer-session ISP proxies that blend datacenter speed with residential trust, static residential addresses that never rotate, and static datacenter IPs for high-throughput jobs that do not need residential reputation.

Beyond raw IPs, AProxy ships scraping-oriented APIs. The Web Scraper API exposes dedicated endpoints for 100+ domains, the Universal Scraper API simulates real user behavior to get past anti-bot defenses, the SERP API returns structured search results from Google and Bing in real time, and the Video Data API is designed for large-scale video metadata collection with cloud storage included. Documented target platforms include Google, Bing, YouTube, DuckDuckGo, Instagram, Facebook, Amazon, and Walmart.

The platform is positioned squarely at AI and data teams: the marketing landing copy talks about empowering LLMs and automation workflows with reliable web data, and the use-case list covers crawl proxies, market research, SEO rank tracking, price monitoring, ad verification, brand protection, and multi-account social media management. Management tools include a usage dashboard, flexible API endpoints for configuration and real-time IP rotation, 1000+ city-level geo-targeting, a proxy checker, and third-party integrations. Support is available via email with a 24-hour response target, and the company states ISO/IEC 27001:2017 certification for its processes.

**Pricing & Plans:** Usage-based pricing with a free trial. Public rate cards start around $0.50/GB for rotating residential traffic, roughly $0.27/GB for long-acting ISP proxies, and per-IP pricing for static residential and static datacenter addresses. Unlimited residential plans are quoted from about $67.87/day, and scraping APIs are metered per 1,000 results. Custom enterprise and affiliate programs are also offered.

- **70M+ IP pool across 195+ countries:** Rotating residential, ISP, static residential, and static datacenter IPs with city-level targeting in 1000+ locations and sub-second connection times.
- **Purpose-built scraping APIs:** Web Scraper API with 100+ dedicated domain endpoints, a Universal Scraper API that mimics real users to defeat anti-bot systems, a real-time SERP API, and a Video Data API with integrated cloud storage.
- **Flexible rotation and session control:** API endpoints let you configure proxy settings and rotate IPs in real time, while ISP proxies support sessions of up to 12 hours for jobs that need a stable identity.
- **Management dashboard and tooling:** Usage tracking, subaccounts and whitelists, a country code lookup, and a proxy checker for validating connectivity before you deploy.
- **Compliance and security posture:** Compliant-source IP sourcing and ISO/IEC 27001:2017 certification, with documented support channels for enterprise procurement.

**Strengths:** Broad IP type coverage (rotating, ISP, static residential, datacenter) from a single vendor; Ready-made scraping and SERP APIs remove the need to build anti-bot handling yourself; Large, well-documented geo-targeting footprint with city-level selection; Transparent public rate cards and a free trial for testing before committing

**Limitations:** Pricing is metered by bandwidth or result count, so heavy workloads scale costs quickly; Unlimited residential plans are priced per day, which is expensive for occasional users; No fully free tier beyond trial credits, which limits casual evaluation

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/aproxy.md)

## Cursor

Cursor's editor looks familiar to anyone who has used a modern IDE, but the center of gravity is the agent. Instead of only suggesting the next line, it can read a task description, inspect the repository, produce an implementation plan, modify many files, run commands, and report back with a summary of what changed. Developers keep control by approving plans, reviewing diffs, and stepping in wherever judgment is needed.

The product has expanded well beyond a single application. Cloud agents can run on their own machines for extended periods, Cursor ships a CLI, and integrations bring the same agent into Slack and GitHub so work can be handed off without switching tools. A model picker lets you use frontier models from several providers, or rely on automatic selection per task.

This makes Cursor a good fit for teams that want measurable velocity gains on large codebases while keeping human review in the loop. The trade-offs are mostly about cost and process: capable agents consume quota, remote indexing raises questions for security-conscious organizations, and teams need light conventions for when to delegate versus write code directly.

**Pricing & Plans:** Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

- **Agent-driven code changes:** An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.
- **Cloud and parallel agents:** Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.
- **Tab completion and codebase context:** Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.
- **Multi-model flexibility:** Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.
- **CLI, Slack and GitHub workflows:** Run Cursor from the terminal, chat with it in Slack, and let it review or open pull requests in GitHub without leaving your workflow.

**Strengths:** Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits; Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub; Choose from multiple frontier models in one place; Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors

**Limitations:** Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage; Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively; Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly; Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do AProxy and Cursor compare in monthly traffic?

AProxy has 36,540 monthly visits, while Cursor has 23,297,751. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

AProxy has a month-over-month growth rate of -41.4%; Cursor has +8.4%.

### How does pricing compare?

AProxy: Free Trial, Paid. Usage-based pricing with a free trial. Public rate cards start around $0.50/GB for rotating residential traffic, roughly $0.27/GB for long-acting ISP proxies, and per-IP pricing for static residential and static datacenter addresses. Unlimited residential plans are quoted from about $67.87/day, and scraping APIs are metered per 1,000 results. Custom enterprise and affiliate programs are also offered. Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 2 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Enables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 3 | [VS Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code) | 7,397,370 | -3.8% | Freemium | Offers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code.md) |
| 4 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 5 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 6 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 7 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 8 | [Browser Use](https://openaitools.app/tool/browser-use) | 1,206,376 | +41.1% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Browser agents and stealth cloud browsers for real web tasks | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/browser-use.md) |
| 9 | [Bright Data](https://openaitools.app/tool/bright-data) | 802,752 | -5.9% | Free Trial, Paid | Web data infrastructure for scraping, proxies, and AI-ready datasets | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/bright-data.md) |
| 10 | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) | 702,366 | -7.8% | Freemium | Delivers a polished AI-native IDE experience with multi-file generation, but has a smaller ecosystem than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/aproxy-vs-cursor

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)