# Augment Code vs RunLLM

Augment Code records 326,215 monthly visits with +24.1% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing pricing. RunLLM records 182 monthly visits with -90.6% growth and Free Trial, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Augment Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/augment-code) | [RunLLM](https://openaitools.app/tool/runllm) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.augmentcode.com | https://www.runllm.com |
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Code Assistant, AI Code Generator, AI Developer Tools | AI Agent, AI Customer Service, AI Assistant, AI Code Assistant |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 326,215 | 182 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +24.1% | -90.6% |
| Primary Market | United States | Global |
| Direct Visits | 137,070 | 71 |
| Review Score | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Augment Code

Augment Code is an AI coding platform aimed at engineering organisations rather than individual autocomplete users. Its foundation is the Context Engine, which builds a structured understanding of an existing repository — dependencies, architecture, conventions — so that AI suggestions and generated changes fit the codebase instead of reading like generic boilerplate. The product works inside common IDEs and also in the terminal via a CLI.

The platform's recent focus is Cosmos, an agent orchestration layer for the software development lifecycle. Instead of a single assistant answering prompts, Cosmos runs connected loops: a ticket becomes a reviewed pull request, every new PR gets a first-pass code review, failed CI runs get diagnosed, Dependabot and Snyk alerts get triaged into prioritised issues, and on-call engineers inherit a completed investigation. Each loop hands its outcome to the next, and quality gates pause work for human review rather than shipping automatically.

Agents can be deployed in managed cloud sandboxes, on your own machines for code that cannot leave the building, or a mix of both. Native triggers cover GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear, Jira, schedules and typed webhooks, with integrations for CI systems. There is a free tier for individuals to try the assistant, while team and enterprise adoption is quote-based; the company has announced it is joining Harness to push the autonomous SDLC from idea to production.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with a free tier for individual developers to start, plus paid team plans and enterprise/contact-for-pricing options. Enterprise deployment includes self-hosted and hybrid agent execution; exact seat and usage pricing is quoted by sales.

- **Context Engine codebase understanding:** Indexes architecture, dependencies and conventions across large repositories so generated code and reviews match how your team actually writes software.
- **Cosmos agent orchestration:** Runs connected SDLC loops — code review, ticket-to-PR, incident triage, dependency upgrades and security remediation — where each agent hands its result to the next.
- **Human-in-the-loop quality gates:** Work pauses at defined checkpoints so engineers approve plans and consequential actions instead of letting agents ship unreviewed changes.
- **Deploy anywhere:** Execute agents in managed cloud sandboxes, on local machines and dev VMs for sensitive code, or in your own AWS and GCP environments.
- **Expert registry and shared memory:** Choose from shipped agents, fork them, or build your own; corrections and shared knowledge improve future runs for the whole team.

**Strengths:** Deep codebase context means suggestions fit existing architecture and conventions; Loops connect across the SDLC instead of solving one isolated task; Quality gates keep humans in control of consequential changes; Flexible deployment including local and self-hosted execution for sensitive code

**Limitations:** Enterprise pricing is quote-based, which makes budgeting harder before a trial; The full value depends on wiring up integrations and triggers across your toolchain; Small teams and solo developers may find the orchestration layer heavier than needed

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/augment-code.md)

## RunLLM

RunLLM, now operating under the Herald brand, has evolved from an enterprise technical-support assistant into what it calls an AI SRE: an agent that catches production issues before engineers are even paged. The pitch is that traditional observability is broken — you have to instrument every data stream, tune alert thresholds, and write runbooks for each failure mode, and anything nobody documented stays invisible.

Herald takes a different approach. Before any alerts fire, it builds a context graph spanning your observability, codebase, CI/CD, documentation, and dependencies, so it learns what normal looks like. It then builds a custom anomaly detection model for each data stream — no thresholds to set — and surfaces validated signals before customers notice. When something looks wrong, the agent evaluates multiple hypotheses simultaneously against the right data sources and hands engineers a root-cause analysis in minutes, no runbook required.

The company reports 100% RCA accuracy on known issues and over 70% on novel incidents for one of the world's biggest B2B2C platforms, and notes that the agent learns from every investigation so it never makes the same mistake twice. Herald was founded by PhDs and professors from UC Berkeley's RISELab, combining expertise in AI, LLMs, data systems, and scalable infrastructure.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free trial with demos available; enterprise pricing is quoted on request via sales contact. Check the site's pricing and demo pages for current details.

- **Context-aware learning:** Herald builds a context graph across observability, codebase, CI/CD, docs, and dependencies before alerts fire, so it understands what normal looks like.
- **Predictive detection:** No thresholds to tune: Herald builds a custom anomaly detection model for each data stream and surfaces validated issues before customers notice.
- **Automated investigation:** The agent evaluates multiple hypotheses at once against the right data sources and delivers root-cause analyses in minutes without runbooks.
- **Grounded in production:** 100% RCA accuracy on known issues and 70%+ on novel incidents, learning from every investigation so it never repeats a mistake.
- **Fast onboarding:** Scans your codebase, finds the tools you use, and configures itself in minutes, adapting quickly to your stack.

**Strengths:** Detects and investigates issues before alerts fire; No thresholds or runbooks to author and maintain; Correlates signals across code, infra, and telemetry; Built by UC Berkeley RISELab researchers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/runllm.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Augment Code and RunLLM compare in monthly traffic?

Augment Code has 326,215 monthly visits, while RunLLM has 182. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Augment Code has a month-over-month growth rate of +24.1%; RunLLM has -90.6%.

### How does pricing compare?

Augment Code: Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with a free tier for individual developers to start, plus paid team plans and enterprise/contact-for-pricing options. Enterprise deployment includes self-hosted and hybrid agent execution; exact seat and usage pricing is quoted by sales. RunLLM: Free Trial, Contact for Pricing. Free trial with demos available; enterprise pricing is quoted on request via sales contact. Check the site's pricing and demo pages for current details.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | The AI coding agent for building ambitious software | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) |
| 2 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Offers powerful parallel agentic workflows and dedicated IDE tools, but with less focus on proprietary enterprise codebase context. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 3 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Describe your idea and Replit builds a working app in minutes | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 4 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor-sh) | 4,790,129 | +6.5% | Freemium | Integrates directly into VS Code as a daily coding editor, but lacks enterprise-wide multi-agent SDLC orchestration. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor-sh.md) |
| 5 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Focuses on spec-driven engineering and automated verification from AWS, whereas Augment targets broader multi-agent SDLC automation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 6 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer tackling complex tickets independently, whereas Augment focuses on developer-in-the-loop workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 7 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 8 | [Orca](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca) | 1,025,891 | +1% | Free, Open Source, Enterprise on request | Provides an open-source agent development environment running parallel CLI coding agents, but requires manual configuration and setup. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca.md) |
| 9 | [KaneAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai) | 901,340 | +13.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | GenAI-native end-to-end QA agent that plans, writes and heals tests in plain language | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai.md) |
| 10 | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) | 702,366 | -7.8% | Freemium | Provides a fast AI-native IDE experience with deep project understanding, but lacks advanced enterprise context engines. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/augment-code-vs-runllm

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)