# Augment Code vs Trunk

Augment Code records 326,215 monthly visits with +24.1% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing pricing. Trunk records 31,564 monthly visits with +15.5% growth and Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Augment Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/augment-code) | [Trunk](https://openaitools.app/tool/trunk) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.augmentcode.com | https://trunk.io |
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Code Assistant, AI Code Generator, AI Developer Tools | AI Developer Tools, AI Assistant, AI Agent, AI Testing |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 326,215 | 31,564 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +24.1% | +15.5% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 137,070 | 18,755 |
| Review Score | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Augment Code

Augment Code is an AI coding platform aimed at engineering organisations rather than individual autocomplete users. Its foundation is the Context Engine, which builds a structured understanding of an existing repository — dependencies, architecture, conventions — so that AI suggestions and generated changes fit the codebase instead of reading like generic boilerplate. The product works inside common IDEs and also in the terminal via a CLI.

The platform's recent focus is Cosmos, an agent orchestration layer for the software development lifecycle. Instead of a single assistant answering prompts, Cosmos runs connected loops: a ticket becomes a reviewed pull request, every new PR gets a first-pass code review, failed CI runs get diagnosed, Dependabot and Snyk alerts get triaged into prioritised issues, and on-call engineers inherit a completed investigation. Each loop hands its outcome to the next, and quality gates pause work for human review rather than shipping automatically.

Agents can be deployed in managed cloud sandboxes, on your own machines for code that cannot leave the building, or a mix of both. Native triggers cover GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear, Jira, schedules and typed webhooks, with integrations for CI systems. There is a free tier for individuals to try the assistant, while team and enterprise adoption is quote-based; the company has announced it is joining Harness to push the autonomous SDLC from idea to production.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with a free tier for individual developers to start, plus paid team plans and enterprise/contact-for-pricing options. Enterprise deployment includes self-hosted and hybrid agent execution; exact seat and usage pricing is quoted by sales.

- **Context Engine codebase understanding:** Indexes architecture, dependencies and conventions across large repositories so generated code and reviews match how your team actually writes software.
- **Cosmos agent orchestration:** Runs connected SDLC loops — code review, ticket-to-PR, incident triage, dependency upgrades and security remediation — where each agent hands its result to the next.
- **Human-in-the-loop quality gates:** Work pauses at defined checkpoints so engineers approve plans and consequential actions instead of letting agents ship unreviewed changes.
- **Deploy anywhere:** Execute agents in managed cloud sandboxes, on local machines and dev VMs for sensitive code, or in your own AWS and GCP environments.
- **Expert registry and shared memory:** Choose from shipped agents, fork them, or build your own; corrections and shared knowledge improve future runs for the whole team.

**Strengths:** Deep codebase context means suggestions fit existing architecture and conventions; Loops connect across the SDLC instead of solving one isolated task; Quality gates keep humans in control of consequential changes; Flexible deployment including local and self-hosted execution for sensitive code

**Limitations:** Enterprise pricing is quote-based, which makes budgeting harder before a trial; The full value depends on wiring up integrations and triggers across your toolchain; Small teams and solo developers may find the orchestration layer heavier than needed

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/augment-code.md)

## Trunk

Trunk is a commercial DevOps platform aimed at engineering teams whose continuous integration pipeline has become a bottleneck. Rather than replacing your CI provider, Trunk layers on top of it: it ingests test results from any language, test runner or CI system, builds a history of each test's reliability, and quarantines flaky tests automatically so they stop blocking and re-running pipelines. Teams get per-PR test summaries, automatic Linear or Jira ticket creation and test status history showing exactly when a test became flaky or broken.

On top of flaky test management, Trunk offers a GitHub merge queue designed to keep the main branch green. Failed pull requests stay in the queue while downstream PRs are still tested, so a passing later PR does not get penalised by an earlier flaky failure. Intelligent batching groups up to 100 PRs per run and automatically bisects a failing batch to isolate the culprit, while parallel queues let hotfixes jump ahead without cascading rebuilds. Dynamic CI extends the idea further by giving every CI job a per-push run-or-skip verdict based on what changed, how the job has behaved historically and where the PR sits in a stack, with a learning mode that reports projected savings before you enable skipping.

Positioning has shifted toward CI acceleration, with the company citing customers such as Brex, Ramp and Zillow. Deployment is SaaS by default, with on-premises or bring-your-own-cloud available in private preview, and SOC 2 Type II plus SAML SSO on the Enterprise tier. Trunk publishes a public CI Health Report and comparison pages against GitHub, Buildkite, Mergify and Aviator.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with a free tier for teams up to 5 committers and 1M test spans per committer per month (capped at 5M). The Team plan is a paid per-committer subscription that includes unlimited seats and bills $3 per additional 1M test spans beyond the included allowance, with a free trial. Enterprise adds SAML SSO, SOC 2 Type II, volume test-span pricing, on-prem or BYOC deployment and 24/7 support with SLAs — custom pricing, contact sales.

- **Flaky test detection and quarantine:** Works with any language, test runner or CI provider to identify flaky versus genuinely broken tests and quarantine the flaky ones automatically.
- **Intelligent merge queue:** Batches up to 100 pull requests per run with automatic bisection of failing batches, plus parallel lanes so hotfixes skip the line.
- **Anti-flake protection:** Failed PRs stay in the queue while downstream PRs keep testing, and if a later PR passes both can merge — main stays green.
- **Dynamic CI:** Gives every job a per-push run-or-skip verdict, with a Learning Mode that shows projected savings on your repo before you turn skipping on.
- **AI-powered failure analysis:** Spots duplicate failures, summarises what went wrong in PR comments, and opens or updates Linear and Jira tickets automatically.

**Strengths:** Works with existing CI providers instead of forcing a migration; Free tier covers small teams up to five committers with no card required; Merge queue features like batching, bisection and anti-flake protection directly reduce merge time; Strong security posture including SOC 2 Type II and on-prem options for enterprises

**Limitations:** Pricing is per-committer and ad-free tiers get rate-limited by test-span allowances; Dynamic CI is still labelled beta and requires opt-in access; The full value depends on having enough test volume and PR traffic to generate useful signal

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/trunk.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Augment Code and Trunk compare in monthly traffic?

Augment Code has 326,215 monthly visits, while Trunk has 31,564. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Augment Code has a month-over-month growth rate of +24.1%; Trunk has +15.5%.

### How does pricing compare?

Augment Code: Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with a free tier for individual developers to start, plus paid team plans and enterprise/contact-for-pricing options. Enterprise deployment includes self-hosted and hybrid agent execution; exact seat and usage pricing is quoted by sales. Trunk: Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with a free tier for teams up to 5 committers and 1M test spans per committer per month (capped at 5M). The Team plan is a paid per-committer subscription that includes unlimited seats and bills $3 per additional 1M test spans beyond the included allowance, with a free trial. Enterprise adds SAML SSO, SOC 2 Type II, volume test-span pricing, on-prem or BYOC deployment and 24/7 support with SLAs — custom pricing, contact sales.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Google's agent-first development platform for building and shipping software with AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 2 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Streamlines cloud-based full-stack app building and deployment from natural language, but less tailored for large legacy enterprise repos. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 3 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor-sh) | 4,790,129 | +6.5% | Freemium | Integrates directly into VS Code as a daily coding editor, but lacks enterprise-wide multi-agent SDLC orchestration. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor-sh.md) |
| 4 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Focuses on spec-driven engineering and automated verification from AWS, whereas Augment targets broader multi-agent SDLC automation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 5 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer tackling complex tickets independently, whereas Augment focuses on developer-in-the-loop workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 6 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Delivers a terminal-first workflow optimized for open-weight models, but offers less graphical enterprise management tooling. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 7 | [Orca](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca) | 1,025,891 | +1% | Free, Open Source, Enterprise on request | Provides an open-source agent development environment running parallel CLI coding agents, but requires manual configuration and setup. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca.md) |
| 8 | [KaneAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai) | 901,340 | +13.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | GenAI-native end-to-end QA agent that plans, writes and heals tests in plain language | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai.md) |
| 9 | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) | 702,366 | -7.8% | Freemium | An AI IDE and coding agent that works on your project, not just your cursor | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md) |
| 10 | [Warp](https://openaitools.app/tool/warp-ai) | 657,372 | -9.3% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | AI-powered terminal and agentic software factory for development teams | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/warp-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/augment-code-vs-trunk

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)