# Boxes.dev vs InVideo

Boxes.dev records 552 monthly visits with 0% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing. InVideo records 6,893,591 monthly visits with +4.6% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Boxes.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/boxes-dev) | [InVideo](https://openaitools.app/tool/invideo) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://boxes.dev | https://invideo.io |
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI Code Assistant, AI Copilot | AI Video Editor, AI Video Generator, Text to Video, AI Text-to-Speech |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 552 | 6,893,591 |
| MoM Growth Rate | 0% | +4.6% |
| Primary Market | Global | United States |
| Direct Visits | 159 | 2,342,046 |
| Review Score | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 92 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Boxes.dev

Boxes.dev solves a problem that appears the moment you start running more than one AI coding agent at a time: a single laptop cannot give several agents isolated filesystems, isolated ports and enough CPU at once. The product's answer is to hand each meaningful body of work its own cloud machine, called a devbox. A devbox is a real Linux computer with its own filesystem, its own processes, port forwarding back to localhost, and your development setup already installed, so several tasks can run in parallel without port collisions or resource contention.

What makes Boxes.dev distinctive is that it does not introduce a new agent harness. It runs the native Claude Code and Codex CLI you already pay for, using your existing subscription or API key — the company explicitly does not sell tokens. Onboarding is designed to be handed to the agent itself: you paste a prompt into Claude Code or Codex inside your project folder, the agent inspects your environment (env files, local databases, tooling outside the repo), drafts a setup plan, and after your approval a second agent executes the plan on a remote box. The resulting filesystem-and-memory snapshot becomes the template that all future devboxes boot from in seconds.

Operationally, agents can be started from Slack by mentioning the bot, by assigning a Linear issue, by a cron schedule, or by a single API call, and results come back where you asked for them. Devboxes sleep automatically when idle and sleeping boxes are free, which keeps parallelism from turning into runaway cost. The company positions it against Devin, Cursor and bare Claude Code/Codex setups, emphasising full cloud computers per agent, a native iOS and Android app, live session sharing for teammates, and preview URLs for running apps.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with a usage-based model. A free trial includes 20 box-hours with a template box plus 3 awake devboxes and unlimited sleeping boxes. Paid tiers per user per month: Starter $19 (50 box-hours, 5 awake devboxes), Pro $99 (300 box-hours, 12 awake devboxes) and Max $249 (750 box-hours, 25 awake devboxes). Overage is $0.40 per box-hour with prepaid discounts up to 10%. Teams plans with SSO, SCIM, RBAC and audit logs are custom-priced. A box-hour equals one hour awake on a standard 4 vCPU / 8 GiB / 100 GB machine; larger sizes consume proportionally more.

- **One cloud computer per agent:** Every meaningful task gets a fresh Linux devbox with its own filesystem, processes and ports, so parallel agents never fight over resources or collide on ports.
- **Bring your own Claude Code or Codex:** Boxes.dev runs the native harness and your existing subscription or API key — no new agent framework, and no token resale.
- **Start agents from anywhere:** Kick off work by mentioning @boxes.dev in Slack, assigning a Linear issue, scheduling a cron job, or calling the REST API, with results returned in the same channel.
- **Desktop, mobile, terminal and web clients:** Read threads, approve requests, review diffs or open a terminal on any surface, including full-featured native iOS and Android apps.
- **Sleeping devboxes are free:** Idle boxes suspend automatically and are billed by the second only while awake, keeping the cost of running many agents under control.

**Strengths:** Each agent gets a genuine isolated cloud computer rather than a worktree or sandbox on your laptop; Works with your existing Claude Code or Codex subscription, so there is no separate token bill; Agents can be triggered from Slack, Linear, cron or API, which fits existing team workflows; Idle devboxes sleep for free, and billing is per second, so parallel experiments stay affordable

**Limitations:** Usage is metered in box-hours, so heavy or long-running workloads can exceed included allowances; The free trial's 20 box-hours is enough for evaluation but not sustained daily work; Most powerful features such as SSO, audit logs and dedicated deployment sit behind custom-priced Teams plans

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/boxes-dev.md)

## InVideo

InVideo pairs a full multitrack timeline editor with a set of AI agents that behave like an editing crew. Its editing agent watches and remembers every clip in a project, so you can locate any moment by describing it rather than scrubbing through hours of footage. Give a direction once and the agent can apply it across dozens of shots at once — from cutting pauses to matching a look across the timeline. Beyond the agent, Invideo leans on a familiar "Premiere-style" timeline where you can still step in and make frame-level decisions yourself.

What has made Invideo notable is its shift from a template-first tool into an agentic editor. The platform now advertises Agent Two as "the agentic video editor for serious creatives," with script writing, storyboarding, and custom role-based agents such as cinematographer, music designer, and sound designer. Multiplayer mode with live cursors lets producers, editors, and writers collaborate in real time on the same project.

The product also exposes an extensive library of AI generation tools and third-party models. Depending on plan, users get access to video models such as Google Veo, Kling, Wan, Pixverse, Hailuo, and Seedance, and image models like Nano Banana Pro, Ideogram, Seedream, and Flux Kontext, alongside voice generation, text to speech, music generation, and voice cloning. Invideo also lets you connect external agents such as Claude Cowork, ChatGPT Codex, and Gemini to operate on your timeline, and it markets itself to teams, advertisers, microdrama producers, and social media creators with SOC 2 and GDPR compliance claims.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with a free tier and paid per-seat subscriptions. As listed on the site: Starter from about $10 per seat/month billed annually (400 credits/mo), Plus about $30 per seat/month (2,000 credits/mo), and Max about $75 per seat/month (5,000 credits/mo), each roughly 50% off versus monthly billing. Credits are consumed by AI generations, and enterprise plans are available.

- **Agent Two editing agent:** An agentic editing experience that indexes your footage and applies one direction across many clips, from trimming pauses to matching color, on a real multitrack timeline.
- **Full timeline editor with AI:** A professional-grade multitrack editor where AI handles the heavy lifting but you can always step in and adjust any cut, grade, or mix yourself.
- **Multi-model video, image, and audio generation:** Access to models such as Veo, Kling, Seedance, Nano Banana Pro, Ideogram, and Flux, plus AI voice generation, text to speech, music generation, and voice cloning.
- **Scripting and storyboarding:** Turn an idea or script into a shot-by-shot plan inside the app, and use an AI co-writer to help shape the script before generating.
- **Bring-your-own agent and real-time collaboration:** Connect agents like Claude Cowork, ChatGPT Codex, or Gemini to operate on your timeline, and collaborate with teammates via multiplayer mode with live cursors.

**Strengths:** Agentic editing lets you describe an edit in plain language instead of hand-editing clip by clip; A genuine multitrack timeline means AI assistance never locks you out of manual control; Broad model access (Veo, Kling, Seedance, Nano Banana and more) plus audio and voice tools in one place; Multiplayer collaboration with live cursors suits creative teams and agencies

**Limitations:** Credit-based system means heavy AI generation can consume allowances quickly; The most advanced models and Seedance access are gated to higher tiers; The breadth of agents and models can be overwhelming for first-time users

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/invideo.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Boxes.dev and InVideo compare in monthly traffic?

Boxes.dev has 552 monthly visits, while InVideo has 6,893,591. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Boxes.dev has a month-over-month growth rate of 0%; InVideo has +4.6%.

### How does pricing compare?

Boxes.dev: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with a usage-based model. A free trial includes 20 box-hours with a template box plus 3 awake devboxes and unlimited sleeping boxes. Paid tiers per user per month: Starter $19 (50 box-hours, 5 awake devboxes), Pro $99 (300 box-hours, 12 awake devboxes) and Max $249 (750 box-hours, 25 awake devboxes). Overage is $0.40 per box-hour with prepaid discounts up to 10%. Teams plans with SSO, SCIM, RBAC and audit logs are custom-priced. A box-hour equals one hour awake on a standard 4 vCPU / 8 GiB / 100 GB machine; larger sizes consume proportionally more. InVideo: Freemium. Freemium with a free tier and paid per-seat subscriptions. As listed on the site: Starter from about $10 per seat/month billed annually (400 credits/mo), Plus about $30 per seat/month (2,000 credits/mo), and Max about $75 per seat/month (5,000 credits/mo), each roughly 50% off versus monthly billing. Credits are consumed by AI generations, and enterprise plans are available.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [CapCut](https://openaitools.app/tool/capcut-com) | 54,700,686 | +13.2% | Freemium | Provides robust timeline editing and AI tools, but focuses more on social media content than automated script generation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/capcut-com.md) |
| 2 | [ElevenLabs](https://openaitools.app/tool/elevenlabs-io) | 42,396,771 | +26.1% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | AI audio platform for speech, agents, music and dubbing | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elevenlabs-io.md) |
| 3 | [VEED.IO](https://openaitools.app/tool/veed-io) | 8,011,728 | +1.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Offers seamless browser-based video editing and AI subtitle generation, though less focused on automated text-to-video scripting. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/veed-io.md) |
| 4 | [Runway](https://openaitools.app/tool/runwayml) | 7,498,396 | +16.9% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Excels in cinematic generative AI video models, but provides less traditional timeline editing for standard marketing videos. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/runwayml.md) |
| 5 | [Kapwing](https://openaitools.app/tool/kapwing-com) | 4,265,531 | -3.8% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Strong collaborative workspace with automated subtitles and AI tools, but lacks InVideo's deep multi-track script-to-video engine. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kapwing-com.md) |
| 6 | [Descript](https://openaitools.app/tool/descript) | 3,267,817 | +11.1% | Freemium, Paid | Pioneers text-based video and audio editing via transcripts, but is less suited for automated prompt-driven promotional video creation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/descript.md) |
| 7 | [RunPod](https://openaitools.app/tool/runpod) | 2,881,043 | +5.9% | Paid | The AI developer cloud for GPU pods, serverless inference and clustering | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/runpod.md) |
| 8 | [Renderforest](https://openaitools.app/tool/renderforest) | 2,608,672 | +1.5% | Freemium | AI creative suite for videos, logos, images and websites | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/renderforest.md) |
| 9 | [Synthesia](https://openaitools.app/tool/synthesia) | 1,804,463 | +7.5% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Focuses heavily on professional AI avatar presentation videos, lacking InVideo's broad stock media library and script-to-video templates. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/synthesia.md) |
| 10 | [TopView.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/topview-ai) | 1,653,060 | -10.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Specializes in AI-driven marketing video creation and automated ad scripts, but has a narrower general video editing scope. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/topview-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/boxes-dev-vs-invideo

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)