# Browser Use vs Rivet.dev

Browser Use records 1,206,376 monthly visits with +41.1% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing. Rivet.dev records 21,359 monthly visits with -44.3% growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Browser Use](https://openaitools.app/tool/browser-use) | [Rivet.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/rivet-dev) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://browser-use.com | https://rivet.dev |
| Categories | AI Agent, AI API, AI Browsers, Large Language Models (LLMs) | AI Agent, AI Workflow, AI Developer Tools, AI App Builder |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Freemium, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 1,206,376 | 21,359 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +41.1% | -44.3% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 625,168 | 10,710 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Browser Use

Browser Use frames an agent as two halves: a harness that decides what to do, and a browser that executes it. The harness reads the page, plans clicks and typing, and can fall back to raw JavaScript evaluation when needed; the browser is a real Chromium instance that renders pages exactly as a person would see them. You hand over an instruction like "buy trail shoes, size 42, under $120" and receive a result plus structured data.

The company publishes its benchmarks publicly, which is unusual in this category. Their stealth browsers are reported to get through on 90.5% of a 100-site test against several competitors, and their shopping agent completes 91.8% of 500 stores. The Browser Harness component is free and open source and is used as the browser tool inside Claude Code and Codex-style agents.

For teams that need to run at scale, Browser Use offers cloud or on-premise browsers, US or EU execution with EU runs staying in Frankfurt, SOC 2 Type II compliance, and HIPAA coverage on enterprise plans. Pricing is usage-based for the hosted services, with a small free credit to start.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with usage-based paid tiers: web agents around $0.006 per task, stealth browsers around $0.02 per browser hour, and the Browser Harness free and open source. $1 in free credit on signup; enterprise and on-premise are contact-for-pricing.

- **Natural-language web agents:** Describe the task and get structured JSON back, handling multi-step flows behind logins without hand-written selectors.
- **Stealth cloud browsers:** Managed Chromium instances with residential IPs that are benchmarked for getting past bot detection and CAPTCHAs.
- **Browser Harness (open source):** A free, open-source harness that plugs into coding agents; benchmarked as the most token-efficient browser tool of the set tested.
- **Cloud or on-premise deployment:** Run browsers in your own network or in managed US/EU cloud regions, with EU data staying in Frankfurt.
- **Compliance and benchmarks:** SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA on enterprise plans, and public head-to-head benchmark results.

**Strengths:** Industry-leading benchmark results published openly; Open-source harness means no lock-in for local development; Usage pricing is granular and starts with a free credit; Enterprise-grade options: on-prem, EU residency, SOC 2 Type II

**Limitations:** Per-task and per-hour costs can add up quickly at high volume; Stealth browsing raises ethical and terms-of-service questions teams must handle; Cloud usage requires an API key and some engineering integration

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/browser-use.md)

## Rivet.dev

At its core Rivet replaces the container per agent with an in-process primitive. An Actor runs inside your existing Node.js or Bun backend rather than in its own container or VM, which is why Rivet reports cold starts measured in single-digit milliseconds and a footprint of tens of kilobytes per Actor instead of hundreds of megabytes. Each Actor carries a SQLite database for memory, can access a filesystem and shell, sleeps when idle, and wakes with its durable state ready for the next request.

The platform handles the operational pieces teams usually build themselves: fault tolerance that reschedules Actors when a node goes down, multi-region placement that routes requests to wherever an Actor currently lives, end-to-end type safety where Actor definitions generate client types, and scheduling via cron or self-set timestamps. Storage is pulled apart into two tiers — a fast SSD for instant writes and object storage that settles writes at a fraction of the cost — so running many small databases stays affordable.

Rivet positions itself as infrastructure for the "agentic era" and can be deployed as a managed cloud, inside your own VPC through a bring-your-own-cloud model, or fully self-hosted down to air-gapped networks. It is open source under Apache 2.0, backed by Y Combinator and a16z Speedrun, and integrates with popular coding agents and frameworks.

**Pricing & Plans:** Rivet Cloud uses a plan-plus-nodes model. The control plane is Free ($0) for prototyping, Hobby at $10/month, Team at $120/month, and Enterprise at $900/month, each raising control-plane redundancy, Actor Node caps, and support. Actor Nodes are billed per month on top, from $4.20 (R-5) to $94.50 (R-160). Self-hosting is free and open source under Apache 2.0, and startups from Y Combinator or a16z Speedrun get 50% off the Team plan for 12 months.

- **Durable actors with persistent state:** Every Actor gets a SQLite database and a filesystem, so an agent's memory and progress survive restarts and idle periods without a separate database.
- **Lightweight secure sandboxing:** Run untrusted or AI-generated code on your own infrastructure with fine-grained control over network access, filesystem permissions, and resource limits.
- **Fault tolerance and workflows:** A node failure reschedules its Actors elsewhere with state intact, and multi-step work replays after a crash — with no checkpointing harness to build yourself.
- **Realtime and multiplayer:** Address an Actor directly over HTTP or hold a live WebSocket, and use the React SDK to subscribe components to an Actor's state in real time.
- **One-binary deployment and observability:** Ship with a single stateless Rust binary, embeds storage in S3-compatible buckets, and emits OpenTelemetry traces, metrics, and logs to your existing collector.

**Strengths:** Four-digit millisecond cold starts and a very small per-Actor memory footprint let a single server host far more agents; Open source (Apache 2.0) with a single Rust binary, so it can be self-hosted, run in a VPC, or air-gapped; Durable state via per-Actor SQLite plus object-storage-backed tiers keeps agents restart-safe and cheap; Strong developer ergonomics: typed SDKs, a React SDK, WebSocket networking, and OpenTelemetry baked in

**Limitations:** Requires Node.js or Bun and a working Rust-based control plane deployment for self-hosting, so it favors backend engineers over no-code users; Advanced durability and sandboxing concepts (Actors, WarpDrive storage) carry a learning curve; Managed cloud cost scales with Actor Nodes, which can climb for many mid-sized/sized nodes; Enterprise features like multi-tenancy and hardened compliance guidance sit behind sales conversations

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/rivet-dev.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Browser Use and Rivet.dev compare in monthly traffic?

Browser Use has 1,206,376 monthly visits, while Rivet.dev has 21,359. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Browser Use has a month-over-month growth rate of +41.1%; Rivet.dev has -44.3%.

### How does pricing compare?

Browser Use: Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with usage-based paid tiers: web agents around $0.006 per task, stealth browsers around $0.02 per browser hour, and the Browser Harness free and open source. $1 in free credit on signup; enterprise and on-premise are contact-for-pricing. Rivet.dev: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Rivet Cloud uses a plan-plus-nodes model. The control plane is Free ($0) for prototyping, Hobby at $10/month, Team at $120/month, and Enterprise at $900/month, each raising control-plane redundancy, Actor Node caps, and support. Actor Nodes are billed per month on top, from $4.20 (R-5) to $94.50 (R-160). Self-hosting is free and open source under Apache 2.0, and startups from Y Combinator or a16z Speedrun get 50% off the Team plan for 12 months.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Apify](https://openaitools.app/tool/apify) | 4,147,762 | +3.9% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Features a massive marketplace of pre-built web scrapers and automation actors, but less focused on autonomous custom LLM agent frameworks. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/apify.md) |
| 2 | [Firecrawl](https://openaitools.app/tool/firecrawl-dev) | 1,828,239 | -1.9% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Excels at converting websites into clean LLM-ready markdown instantly, but does not provide interactive multi-step browser agent execution. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/firecrawl-dev.md) |
| 3 | [TinyFish](https://openaitools.app/tool/tinyfish) | 1,124,952 | +199.7% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Provides cloud browsers and web automation APIs, but lacks a native open-source Python framework for local developer agent building. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/tinyfish.md) |
| 4 | [Bright Data](https://openaitools.app/tool/bright-data) | 802,752 | -5.9% | Free Trial, Paid | Web data infrastructure for scraping, proxies, and AI-ready datasets | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/bright-data.md) |
| 5 | [Mastra](https://openaitools.app/tool/mastra) | 318,954 | -5% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The TypeScript framework for building, deploying, and observing AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mastra.md) |
| 6 | [Browserbase](https://openaitools.app/tool/browserbase) | 283,597 | -8% | Freemium | Provides managed cloud infrastructure for browser agents, but lacks the specific local open-source framework code of Browser Use. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/browserbase.md) |
| 7 | [Browserless](https://openaitools.app/tool/browserless) | 185,543 | -21.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Delivers scalable headless browser hosting via APIs, but requires manual script building rather than autonomous agent orchestration. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/browserless.md) |
| 8 | [Agent 37](https://openaitools.app/tool/agent-37) | 180,030 | +24.2% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | The low-cost cloud sandbox where AI agents actually live | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/agent-37.md) |
| 9 | [Coder](https://openaitools.app/tool/coder) | 149,417 | -12.8% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Self-hosted cloud development environments and AI coding agents for enterprise teams | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/coder.md) |
| 10 | [ScrapeGraphAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/scrapegraphai) | 91,362 | -25.7% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Turn any website into structured JSON with a prompt instead of selectors | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scrapegraphai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/browser-use-vs-rivet-dev

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)