# Chat Figures vs Consensus

Chat Figures records 0 monthly visits with — month-over-month growth and Freemium, Paid pricing. Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Chat Figures](https://openaitools.app/tool/chat-figures) | [Consensus](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/chat-figures/ekoknoogfnngkknedfbodhnlkhdioiih | https://consensus.app |
| Categories | AI Describe Image, AI Image Recognition, AI Research Papers | AI Search Engine, AI Research Tool, AI Papers, AI Article Summarizer |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Paid | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 0 | 6,014,388 |
| MoM Growth Rate | — | -1.2% |
| Primary Market | Global | United States |
| Direct Visits | 0 | 2,918,713 |
| Review Score | 4.2 | 4.7 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 31 |
| Supported Platforms | Browser Extension | Website |

## Chat Figures

Chat Figures is a Chrome extension built to solve a very specific research pain point: compound scientific figures. Papers routinely pack several panels, axis labels, legends, and annotations into a single image, which makes reading them on screen awkward and makes it nearly impossible to reuse one panel on its own. Chat Figures lets you right-click any image in the browser, sends it through an AI pipeline, and returns a separated view where each sub-figure is isolated and legible.

The extension is lightweight — it installs straight from the Chrome Web Store and adds a context-menu command rather than a heavy toolbar. After separation you can customize the detected regions, download individual sub-figures as standalone images, and export the labels or detected structure as JSON for downstream use in notes, datasets, or slides. The listing supports English and Simplified Chinese and is published by an independent developer.

Because the tool is aimed at academic and technical reading, it is most valuable during literature review, figure reproduction for teaching, and building figure datasets. Availability and pricing details should be confirmed on the developer's own site, which is the canonical source for current plans.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium / paid model according to the tool directory listing. The Chrome extension itself is free to install; the developer's official site is the authoritative place to confirm any paid tiers, quotas, or subscription details.

- **One-click figure separation:** Right-click any image in Chrome, choose Chat Figures, and the AI splits a compound figure into its individual panels in a new tab.
- **Editable detection results:** Review the automatically detected sub-figures and adjust them before exporting, so the output matches how you actually want to read the figure.
- **Per-panel image download:** Export each separated sub-figure as its own image file, making it easy to reuse a single panel in slides, notes, or documentation.
- **JSON label export:** Export detected labels and structure as JSON, which suits researchers building figure datasets or feeding annotations into other tools.
- **Lightweight browser integration:** Distributed as a small Chrome extension with a context-menu workflow, so there is no separate web app to learn or log into for basic use.

**Strengths:** Solves a very specific and genuinely annoying problem: compound scientific figures; Works directly in the browser via right-click, with no separate app or account required for basic use; Exports both individual images and structured JSON, which fits research and dataset workflows; Small install footprint and supports English and Simplified Chinese

**Limitations:** The official companion website was unreachable during review, so current plans and limits are hard to confirm; No user reviews or ratings on the Chrome Web Store listing yet, so there is little independent feedback; Focused narrowly on figure separation and labeling, not full paper comprehension or text summarization

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/chat-figures.md)

## Consensus

Consensus works like a scholarly search engine supercharged by AI. Instead of returning a flat list of PDFs, you ask a natural-language research question and Consensus extracts claims from relevant papers, then shows you what the studies actually find. A Consensus Meter summarizes the weight of evidence for yes/no questions, so you can see at a glance whether scientists largely agree, disagree, or remain divided.

The platform indexes hundreds of millions of peer-reviewed papers spanning medicine, biology, psychology, economics and more. Answers link straight back to the source studies, and you can filter by study design, journal quality, sample size and publication year to separate stronger evidence from weaker signals. Features like Deep Search, Topic Synthesis and Skills let researchers build a working knowledge base over time rather than starting from scratch on every query.

Consensus is designed for researchers, clinicians, students and analysts who need trustworthy signals from the scientific record without drowning in irrelevant results. A free tier gives limited AI-powered searches each month, while paid plans unlock unlimited use, advanced filters and deeper synthesis.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

- **Evidence-grounded answers:** Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
- **Consensus Meter:** A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
- **Powerful filters:** Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
- **Topic synthesis and Deep Search:** Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
- **Research workspace:** Save papers, organize sources and build a persistent knowledge base for literature reviews and ongoing projects.

**Strengths:** Answers cite real peer-reviewed papers, so claims are verifiable; Consensus Meter makes it easy to gauge scientific agreement at a glance; Rich filters help separate high-quality evidence from weaker studies; Fast, clean interface designed around research workflows

**Limitations:** Free tier caps the number of AI-assisted searches per month; Coverage is strongest for STEM and health fields, lighter for some humanities topics; It guides you toward sources but is not a substitute for reading full papers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Chat Figures and Consensus compare in monthly traffic?

Chat Figures has 0 monthly visits, while Consensus has 6,014,388. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Chat Figures has a month-over-month growth rate of —; Consensus has -1.2%.

### How does pricing compare?

Chat Figures: Freemium, Paid. Freemium / paid model according to the tool directory listing. The Chrome extension itself is free to install; the developer's official site is the authoritative place to confirm any paid tiers, quotas, or subscription details. Consensus: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Covers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Semantic Scholar](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar) | 8,198,672 | +5.8% | Free | Completely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar.md) |
| 3 | [Kagi Search](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search) | 4,647,605 | +3.2% | Free Trial, Paid | A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search.md) |
| 4 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 5 | [Elicit](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit) | 1,751,507 | +3.1% | Freemium | Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit.md) |
| 6 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) |
| 7 | [Rayyan](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan) | 1,116,437 | +7.9% | Freemium | AI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan.md) |
| 8 | [Scite](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite) | 841,974 | +1.1% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite.md) |
| 9 | [ResearchRabbit](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit) | 831,571 | +3.1% | Free | Excellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit.md) |
| 10 | [Connected Papers](https://openaitools.app/tool/connected-papers) | 750,576 | +3.1% | Freemium | Visualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/connected-papers.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/chat-figures-vs-consensus

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)