# CherryPick vs DeepSeek

CherryPick records 1,125 monthly visits with -44.8% month-over-month growth and Free pricing. DeepSeek records 372,761,591 monthly visits with +4.3% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [CherryPick](https://openaitools.app/tool/cherrypick) | [DeepSeek](https://openaitools.app/tool/deepseek) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://usecherrypick.com | https://www.deepseek.com |
| Categories | AI Social Media, AI Productivity Tools, AI CRM, AI Sales Assistant | Large Language Models (LLMs), Open Source AI Models, AI API, AI Chatbot |
| Pricing Model | Free | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 1,125 | 372,761,591 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -44.8% | +4.3% |
| Primary Market | Global | China |
| Direct Visits | 442 | 291,585,405 |
| Review Score | 4.1 | 4.8 |
| Saved Count | 2 | 44 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## CherryPick

CherryPick targets a very specific frustration: LinkedIn keeps a record of who you are connected to, but gives you almost no way to segment those people for actual follow-up. Instead of exporting your whole network into a spreadsheet and cleaning it by hand, CherryPick layers tagging controls directly onto the LinkedIn interface. As you scroll through a profile or a search result, you can apply tags on the spot, so your organization happens while you are already doing the browsing you would do anyway.

The tags themselves are yours to define. Recruiters can tag candidates by role or seniority, sales reps can mark prospects by pipeline stage, founders can flag investors and warm intros, and consultants can bucket contacts by industry. Everything you tag shows up in a central dashboard where you can search, filter, and rename, and from there you can export the tagged set as CSV or JSON to push into a CRM, an outreach tool, or a mailing list. CherryPick deliberately positions itself as a bridge rather than a replacement for a CRM.

Pricing is the simplest part: the current product is completely free, with the company signalling that a Premium tier with advanced features is planned for later. There is no Zapier integration or public API yet, so exporting files remains the main handoff mechanism. The extension runs only on desktop Chrome for Mac and Windows, and it only activates while you are on LinkedIn.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free. The extension and dashboard are currently offered at no cost, with a Premium subscription planned for future advanced features.

- **Inline tagging on LinkedIn:** Create custom tags and apply them to contacts directly on LinkedIn pages while you browse, with no separate workflow to maintain.
- **Central tag dashboard:** Review, search, and manage every tag and its associated contacts from one dashboard so your lists stay consistent over time.
- **CSV and JSON export:** Export any tagged segment as a CSV or JSON file that imports cleanly into most CRMs, outreach tools, or spreadsheets.
- **Built for multiple professions:** Useful out of the box for recruiters, sales teams, founders, marketers, consultants, and job seekers who each need different segmentation.
- **Security-conscious design:** The extension is scoped to LinkedIn activity, runs in an ad-free environment, and the company states that user data is not sold to third parties.

**Strengths:** Genuinely free right now, with no credit card or trial clock; Works inside LinkedIn, so tagging happens during browsing rather than as a separate chore; Exports to CSV and JSON, which keeps your data portable to almost any CRM; Simple enough for non-technical users to adopt in minutes

**Limitations:** Desktop Chrome only, with no support for mobile or other browsers; No Zapier or API integration yet, so syncing is manual; The product is Chrome-only and depends on LinkedIn's page structure

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cherrypick.md)

## DeepSeek

DeepSeek (Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Co., Ltd.) is a frontier AI research organization that disrupted the global LLM market by pairing open-weight transparency with breakthrough Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) and reinforcement-learning reasoning efficiency. Following the landmark releases of DeepSeek-V3 and the peer-reviewed DeepSeek-R1 reasoning model, DeepSeek introduced the DeepSeek-V4 generation in 2026—featuring a hybrid attention architecture and a native 1-million-token context window across DeepSeek-V4-Pro (1.6T total parameters, 49B active per token) and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (284B total parameters, 13B active per token).

Users can interact with DeepSeek in three ways: completely free through the consumer web portal (chat.deepseek.com) and mobile apps with one-click toggles for deep thinking and live web search; via DeepSeek's hosted, OpenAI-compatible developer API; or by self-hosting DeepSeek's open-weight checkpoints (including V3, R1, Prover-V2, and distilled Qwen/Llama variants) on private infrastructure. The models excel at competitive mathematics, algorithm design, repository-level software engineering, and structured data extraction, with automatic context caching on the API that slashes repeated prompt costs by over 95%.

In late 2026, DeepSeek remains the price-performance benchmark for developers and automation workflows. While the consumer chat interface remains free without a mandatory $20/month subscription tier, the developer API transitioned in late 2026 to two primary endpoints—`deepseek-flash` and `deepseek-v4-pro`—with time-of-day pricing. Off-peak API calls cost just $0.15 per million input tokens ($0.003 on cache hits) and $0.60 per million output tokens on Flash, and $0.66 input / $1.98 output on V4-Pro, making it a fraction of the cost of comparable Western frontier models.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free web and mobile chat app at chat.deepseek.com; pay-as-you-go OpenAI-compatible API with off-peak rates at $0.15/1M input ($0.003 cache hit) and $0.60/1M output for deepseek-flash (V4.1-Flash), and $0.66/1M input ($0.022 cache hit) and $1.98/1M output for deepseek-v4-pro (peak weekday UTC hours bill at 2x).

- **DeepSeek-V4 Hybrid Attention & 1M Context:** Leverages a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture (49B active parameters out of 1.6T on V4-Pro) to process up to 1 million tokens with minimal latency and memory overhead.
- **Transparent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning:** Pioneered by DeepSeek-R1 and integrated into V3.2 and V4 thinking modes, exposing step-by-step self-verification for complex math, logic, and code debugging.
- **Automatic Context Caching & Off-Peak API Pricing:** Drops input token costs to $0.003/1M on Flash and $0.022/1M on V4-Pro for cache hits, with 50% lower rates during off-peak UTC hours.
- **Free Consumer Web & Mobile Assistant:** Provides free access at chat.deepseek.com and on iOS/Android with document uploads, reasoning mode, and web search without paywalling core models.
- **Open-Weight Ecosystem & Self-Hosting Freedom:** Offers open weights for DeepSeek-V3, R1, Distill variants, and Prover models on Hugging Face and GitHub so enterprises can deploy within air-gapped environments.

**Strengths:** Completely free consumer web and mobile app with deep reasoning and web search included; Ultra-low API token rates ($0.15/$0.60 on Flash, $0.66/$1.98 on V4-Pro off-peak) with up to 98% savings on cached inputs; Drop-in OpenAI API compatibility makes switching or routing between models effortless; Strong open-weight lineage allows teams to self-host or fine-tune models without vendor lock-in

**Limitations:** Hosted API and web app store data on servers in China, prompting compliance restrictions for some Western enterprises and government agencies; Peak-hour API pricing (01:00–04:00 and 06:00–10:00 UTC on weekdays) doubles per-token costs compared to off-peak rates; Lacks native voice mode, video generation, and productivity suite integrations offered by ChatGPT and Google Gemini

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/deepseek.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do CherryPick and DeepSeek compare in monthly traffic?

CherryPick has 1,125 monthly visits, while DeepSeek has 372,761,591. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

CherryPick has a month-over-month growth rate of -44.8%; DeepSeek has +4.3%.

### How does pricing compare?

CherryPick: Free. Free. The extension and dashboard are currently offered at no cost, with a Premium subscription planned for future advanced features. DeepSeek: Freemium. Free web and mobile chat app at chat.deepseek.com; pay-as-you-go OpenAI-compatible API with off-peak rates at $0.15/1M input ($0.003 cache hit) and $0.60/1M output for deepseek-flash (V4.1-Flash), and $0.66/1M input ($0.022 cache hit) and $1.98/1M output for deepseek-v4-pro (peak weekday UTC hours bill at 2x).

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [ChatGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4) | 6,048,022,723 | +2.2% | Freemium | Provides stronger multi-modal reasoning and agentic tools, but lacks DeepSeek's ultra-low-cost API pricing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4.md) |
| 2 | [Google Gemini](https://openaitools.app/tool/gemini-gemini-advanced) | 2,637,398,242 | -0.1% | Freemium | Offers an enormous context window and deep Google ecosystem integration, but feels less specialized for pure reasoning tasks. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gemini-gemini-advanced.md) |
| 3 | [Claude](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2) | 1,253,439,413 | +23.8% | Freemium | Delivers superior long-form coding artifacts and nuanced writing, but lacks DeepSeek's specialized open-weight reasoning models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2.md) |
| 4 | [Grok](https://openaitools.app/tool/grok) | 203,846,050 | -0.8% | Freemium | Features real-time X social data integration, but is less cost-effective for dedicated developer coding workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/grok.md) |
| 5 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Real-time AI answer engine and research workspace combining live web citations with frontier reasoning models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 6 | [Qwen 4 (Alibaba Qwen4)](https://openaitools.app/tool/qwen-4) | 35,101,353 | -6.2% | Freemium | Provides comparable open-weight foundation models and multilingual performance, but requires self-hosting or third-party inference setup. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qwen-4.md) |
| 7 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | The AI coding agent for building ambitious software | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) |
| 8 | [Kimi AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kimi-chat) | 19,632,261 | -23.4% | Free | Excels at ultra-long document analysis and research, but lacks the same level of open-weight developer community support. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kimi-chat.md) |
| 9 | [Ollama](https://openaitools.app/tool/ollama) | 9,421,973 | +4.3% | Free, Freemium, Paid | Enables running open-source models locally on consumer hardware, but lacks DeepSeek's cloud-scale hosted reasoning power. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ollama.md) |
| 10 | [Dify](https://openaitools.app/tool/dify-ai) | 819,691 | -15% | Freemium | Build, deploy, and govern production-ready agentic AI workflows | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/dify-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/cherrypick-vs-deepseek

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)