# Circleback vs Earmark

Circleback records 272,906 monthly visits with +12.5% month-over-month growth and Free Trial pricing. Earmark records 2,015 monthly visits with -33.9% growth and Free Trial, Paid pricing.

| Metric | [Circleback](https://openaitools.app/tool/circleback) | [Earmark](https://openaitools.app/tool/earmark) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://circleback.ai | https://www.tryearmark.com |
| Categories | AI Note Taker, AI Meeting Assistant, AI Transcription, AI Notes Generator | AI Product Manager, AI Meeting Assistant, AI Agent, AI Productivity Tools |
| Pricing Model | Free Trial | Free Trial, Paid |
| Monthly Visits | 272,906 | 2,015 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +12.5% | -33.9% |
| Primary Market | United States | Global |
| Direct Visits | 200,016 | 793 |
| Review Score | 4.4 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 2 | 1 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Circleback

Circleback is built around the idea that a meeting should keep producing value after it ends. It joins or records your calls — via a bot or a bot-free desktop app for macOS and Windows — transcribes each speaker by name, and automatically generates organized notes, decisions, and assigned action items. Everything it captures becomes searchable, so you can ask questions and get answers drawn from every conversation your team has had.

The product goes beyond note-taking with a layer of automations and integrations. After a meeting it can update HubSpot or Salesforce records, create Linear issues, update Notion pages and Asana tasks, log activity in Attio, or send notes to Slack. A universal task list aggregates action items from all meetings, and an API, webhooks, MCP endpoint, and CLI let developers feed meeting context into AI agents and custom workflows.

Circleback is backed by Y Combinator and used by teams at a wide range of companies. It supports in-person recording, importing past audio or video, and capturing what is shared on screen so slides and dashboards appear in your notes. It offers a free tier plus paid plans, with pricing listed on its site.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free to start, with paid plans for higher usage and advanced features. A free trial and tier are available; see circleback.ai/pricing for current plan details.

- **Accurate multi-speaker transcription:** Supports 100+ languages with speaker identification by name and strong technical-term and accent accuracy.
- **Automatic notes and action items:** Generates structured summaries, decisions, and assigned action items right after each meeting.
- **Automations and integrations:** Pushes updates to CRMs, issue trackers, Notion, Asana, Slack, and dozens more apps automatically.
- **Search across all conversations:** Ask questions and get answers synthesized from every meeting, email context, and connected source.
- **Bot-free desktop and mobile recording:** Record in-person meetings or calls without a bot joining, using the macOS, Windows, iOS, and Android apps.

**Strengths:** Highly accurate notes and action items praised by users across sales and product roles; Very broad integration coverage, from CRMs to issue trackers and Slack; Bot-free desktop app option plus in-person recording support; Supports 100+ languages with named speaker identification

**Limitations:** Advanced automation and higher usage require paid plans; The breadth of integrations can take time to configure well; Very long meetings and heavy usage consume plan minutes quickly

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/circleback.md)

## Earmark

Earmark reframes the meeting as the work itself. Instead of taking notes and reconstructing decisions afterward, teams ask Earmark for the output they need — a spec, a decision record, a follow-up — and it drafts that document from the live conversation while the people with the answers are still in the room.

A core strength is handoff. Earmark prepares ticket drafts with titles, descriptions, and acceptance criteria for Linear or Jira, and can build briefs for Cursor or UI prompts for v0 that export with one click. Saved meetings live in Projects so invited teammates can query the shared context later. It can also suggest better questions during the discussion, improving as the conversation develops.

Privacy is treated seriously. Earmark states that customer meeting content is never used to train AI models and that its AI providers are held to the same rule. Meetings can be saved or run in Temporary Mode so their content stays out of history, transcript files can be stored locally as Markdown for use in Obsidian or with coding agents, and teams get a botless capture experience rather than a bot joining the call.

**Pricing & Plans:** Earmark offers a free trial with paid plans; see the pricing section on the site for current tiers and seat details.

- **Live deliverable drafting:** Ask for a spec, decision record, or follow-up and Earmark drafts it during the meeting so gaps surface while they are easy to fix.
- **Ticket and handoff exports:** Generate ticket drafts with acceptance criteria and export reviewed work to Linear or Jira, or briefs into Cursor and v0.
- **Botless capture with projects:** No bot joins the call, and saved meetings live in Projects where invited teammates can query the shared context later.
- **Suggested questions:** Earmark proposes clarifying questions in real time, sharpening as the discussion progresses.
- **Local Markdown transcripts:** The desktop app can save transcripts as Markdown files you can use in Obsidian or feed to coding agents.

**Strengths:** Deliverables are drafted live in the meeting rather than reconstructed later; One-click export into Linear, Jira, Cursor, and v0 fits existing workflows; Explicit commitment not to train AI models on customer meeting content; Botless capture plus local Markdown transcripts give teams flexibility and control

**Limitations:** Focused on product and engineering meetings, so other use cases get less tailored output; Temporary Mode and local transcript storage require deliberate setup; Best value depends on the team actually adopting the exported tickets and briefs

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/earmark.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Circleback and Earmark compare in monthly traffic?

Circleback has 272,906 monthly visits, while Earmark has 2,015. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Circleback has a month-over-month growth rate of +12.5%; Earmark has -33.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Circleback: Free Trial. Free to start, with paid plans for higher usage and advanced features. A free trial and tier are available; see circleback.ai/pricing for current plan details. Earmark: Free Trial, Paid. Earmark offers a free trial with paid plans; see the pricing section on the site for current tiers and seat details.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [TurboScribe](https://openaitools.app/tool/turboscribe-ai) | 27,661,771 | +2.1% | Freemium | Unlimited AI transcription of audio and video in 98+ languages | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/turboscribe-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Otter AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/otter-ai) | 7,360,981 | +9.6% | Freemium | AI meeting agent that transcribes, summarises, and turns every conversation into searchable knowledge | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/otter-ai.md) |
| 3 | [Tactiq](https://openaitools.app/tool/tactiq) | 6,521,542 | +4.1% | Freemium | Live meeting transcription and AI notes without a bot in the call | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/tactiq.md) |
| 4 | [Fathom](https://openaitools.app/tool/fathom-2-0) | 5,620,385 | +0.2% | Freemium, Free Trial | AI notetaker that records, transcribes and summarizes meetings — bot-free | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fathom-2-0.md) |
| 5 | [Fireflies.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/fireflies-ai) | 4,411,502 | +3% | Freemium | AI teammate that records, transcribes and summarizes every meeting | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fireflies-ai.md) |
| 6 | [Read Speaker Coach](https://openaitools.app/tool/read-speaker-coach) | 4,071,302 | -4.8% | Freemium, Paid | Meeting summaries, transcripts, and AI search that turn meetings into outcomes | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/read-speaker-coach.md) |
| 7 | [Notta](https://openaitools.app/tool/notta) | 2,585,354 | +2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Delivers fast multi-language transcription and visual notes, but lacks some of Circleback's advanced workflow automations. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/notta.md) |
| 8 | [tl;dv](https://openaitools.app/tool/tldv-io) | 1,396,729 | +1.9% | Freemium | Excels at capturing global video calls and creating timestamped clips, though deeper workspace integrations are limited. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/tldv-io.md) |
| 9 | [Noota](https://openaitools.app/tool/noota) | 283,526 | +3.3% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Bot-free AI meeting assistant hosted in Europe | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/noota.md) |
| 10 | [Mymeet.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/mymeet-ai) | 259,566 | -0.4% | Freemium | AI meeting assistant that transcribes, summarizes and assigns your action items | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mymeet-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/circleback-vs-earmark

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)
