# Claude vs Forma

Claude records 1,253,439,413 monthly visits with +23.8% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Forma records 2,864 monthly visits with -11.5% growth and Free pricing.

| Metric | [Claude](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2) | [Forma](https://openaitools.app/tool/forma) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://claude.ai | https://forma.run |
| Categories | AI Assistant, AI Chatbot, AI API, AI Copilot | AI Fitness, AI Sports, AI Healthcare |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 1,253,439,413 | 2,864 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +23.8% | -11.5% |
| Primary Market | United States | India |
| Direct Visits | 903,031,935 | 1,012 |
| Review Score | 4.8 | 4 |
| Saved Count | 78 | 3 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Claude

Claude is Anthropic's flagship AI assistant, renowned among software engineers, writers, and enterprise analysts for its natural prose, low hallucination rates, and sustained agentic execution. While the legacy directory slug still references 2023's 'Claude 2', both the Claude 2 and Claude 3/3.5/3.7 generations have been fully retired. As of late 2026, claude.ai runs on the Claude 5.5 generation—led by Claude Opus 5.5 (released September 2026), Claude Sonnet 5.5 for rapid everyday tasks and coding, and Claude Haiku 5.5—supporting up to a 1-million-token context window, 128K output tokens, and adaptive extended thinking.

Inside the web, desktop, and mobile apps, Claude functions as a full production workspace rather than a simple chat box. Users organize persistent knowledge bases with custom instructions in Projects, render and edit live React applications, SVGs, mermaid diagrams, and formatted slide decks side-by-side in Artifacts, and connect external SaaS tools via the open Model Context Protocol (MCP) and native web search. Paid subscribers also gain access to Claude Code—Anthropic's terminal and IDE agent capable of autonomous multi-file engineering across entire codebases—and Claude Cowork for collaborative enterprise task execution.

Anthropic structures Claude's 2026 pricing around compute capacity and team governance. The Free tier offers daily access to Sonnet 5.5, while Claude Pro ($20/month or $17/month billed annually) unlocks Opus 5.5, extended thinking, Projects, and entry-level Claude Code access. Heavy individual builders can upgrade to Claude Max at $100/month (5x Pro capacity) or $200/month (20x Pro capacity), while organizations can mix Team Standard seats ($20/seat/month annual) and Team Premium seats ($100/seat/month annual with 5x capacity and full Claude Code access) or adopt usage-based Enterprise contracts with audit logs and SCIM.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free tier ($0); Claude Pro at $20/mo ($17/mo billed annually at $200/yr); Claude Max at $100/mo (5x Pro usage) or $200/mo (20x Pro usage); Team Standard at $25/seat/mo ($20/mo annual) and Team Premium at $125/seat/mo ($100/mo annual); Enterprise from $20/seat/mo + API usage.

- **Claude 5.5 Model Family & Adaptive Thinking:** Combines frontier Claude Opus 5.5 and high-speed Sonnet 5.5 with configurable extended thinking, up to 1M-token context windows, and 128K-token outputs.
- **Claude Code & Claude Cowork Included on Paid Plans:** Pro, Max, and Team Premium plans bundle Claude Code for autonomous command-line software engineering, test execution, and repository-wide refactoring.
- **Interactive Artifacts & Document Generation:** Renders live interactive web apps, visualizations, spreadsheets, and formatted PowerPoint decks in a dedicated workspace panel alongside the chat.
- **Projects & Model Context Protocol (MCP):** Grounds conversations in shared project knowledge bases and connects directly to local filesystems, GitHub, Slack, and internal databases via MCP.
- **Constitutional AI Safety & Enterprise Governance:** Trained on Anthropic's updated 2026 Constitution with strict privacy guarantees, SSO, SCIM provisioning, and HIPAA-ready healthcare configurations.

**Strengths:** Top-tier coding, bug-fixing, and agentic planning performance powered by Claude Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5; Natural, nuanced writing style that avoids the repetitive clichés common in competing LLMs; Claude Max ($100/mo 5x and $200/mo 20x) and mixed Team Standard/Premium seats provide clear scaling for heavy Claude Code users; Open Model Context Protocol (MCP) ecosystem enables deep, standardized connections to local tools and enterprise data

**Limitations:** No native photorealistic image or video generation inside claude.ai (limited to SVGs, code charts, and diagrams); Free tier does not include Claude Code and hits 5-hour rolling message limits quickly during long-context chats; Pro users ($20/mo) who rely heavily on Opus 5.5 or Claude Code can still exhaust their 5-hour rolling window and require Max ($100/mo)

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2.md)

## Forma

Forma is a lightweight web tool for runners who want a second opinion on their mechanics without booking a gait lab or a physio session. You upload a video of yourself running, and the service runs an AI-powered analysis that frames the results in the language of running efficiency and injury prevention. The site describes the analysis as expert-level and notes that it was designed by sports medicine professionals, which sets expectations that the feedback is coaching-oriented rather than a bare measurement readout.

The appeal is accessibility. Traditional running gait analysis often requires finding a specialist, booking time, and paying a consultation fee. Forma collapses that into an upload, which makes it realistic to check your form after a training block change, after an injury layoff, or when a new shoe or surface alters how you move.

Because the product is free and the interface is deliberately minimal, Forma fits best as a recurring self-check rather than a one-off appointment. It does not replace a clinician when you have genuine pain, but it can help you notice patterns, compare how you look over time, and prepare better questions for a coach or medical professional.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free. The site presents the running analysis at no cost, with no published subscription or per-analysis pricing visible.

- **AI running form review:** Submit a video of your running gait and receive an automated analysis of your technique rather than a raw recording with no interpretation.
- **Sports-medicine framing:** Analysis is presented through a sports medicine lens, focusing on efficiency and injury-prevention cues rather than generic fitness scoring.
- **Simple video upload:** A dedicated upload flow keeps the process to a single step: capture your run, upload the clip, and get feedback.
- **Free to use:** The tool is offered at no cost, making it practical to re-analyze your form repeatedly as your training evolves.

**Strengths:** Free access removes the cost barrier that usually accompanies gait analysis; Designed with input from sports medicine professionals rather than built as a generic pose estimator; Feedback is framed around practical running efficiency and injury prevention; Very low friction: just record and upload a video

**Limitations:** As a browser app it depends on JavaScript, so it will not work with scripts disabled; The site offers limited written detail about the underlying model and its accuracy; It is guidance for self-directed training, not a clinical assessment

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/forma.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Claude and Forma compare in monthly traffic?

Claude has 1,253,439,413 monthly visits, while Forma has 2,864. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Claude has a month-over-month growth rate of +23.8%; Forma has -11.5%.

### How does pricing compare?

Claude: Freemium. Free tier ($0); Claude Pro at $20/mo ($17/mo billed annually at $200/yr); Claude Max at $100/mo (5x Pro usage) or $200/mo (20x Pro usage); Team Standard at $25/seat/mo ($20/mo annual) and Team Premium at $125/seat/mo ($100/mo annual); Enterprise from $20/seat/mo + API usage. Forma: Free. Free. The site presents the running analysis at no cost, with no published subscription or per-analysis pricing visible.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [ChatGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4) | 6,048,022,723 | +2.2% | Freemium | Stronger multimodal voice capabilities and reasoning models, but less refined inline artifact generation and agentic coding. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatgpt-4.md) |
| 2 | [Google Gemini](https://openaitools.app/tool/gemini-gemini-advanced) | 2,637,398,242 | -0.1% | Freemium | Massive context window and deep Google Workspace integration, but less nuanced creative writing and coding control. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gemini-gemini-advanced.md) |
| 3 | [DeepSeek](https://openaitools.app/tool/deepseek) | 372,761,591 | +4.3% | Freemium | Significantly lower API costs and powerful open-weight reasoning models, but a less polished consumer chat workspace. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/deepseek.md) |
| 4 | [Grok](https://openaitools.app/tool/grok) | 203,846,050 | -0.8% | Freemium | Real-time access to live social media data and rapid image generation, but less reliable for technical coding tasks. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/grok.md) |
| 5 | [Notion](https://openaitools.app/tool/t) | 173,441,670 | +0.1% | Freemium | Unified document management and structured database workflows with built-in AI, but less powerful standalone LLM reasoning. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/t.md) |
| 6 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Superior real-time web search with verifiable inline citations, but less capable at complex multi-file coding and artifact creation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 7 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | Dedicated AI-first code editor built for multi-file software engineering, but lacks general-purpose writing and analytical projects. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) |
| 8 | [Kimi AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kimi-chat) | 19,632,261 | -23.4% | Free | Exceptional long-context document analysis and multi-step research, but lacks Claude's polished interactive coding artifacts. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kimi-chat.md) |
| 9 | [Manus](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus) | 19,195,779 | -1.7% | Free Trial | Fully autonomous agent executing complex multi-step web tasks, but less suited for conversational brainstorming and iterative writing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/manus.md) |
| 10 | [Veo Sports Camera](https://openaitools.app/tool/veo-co) | 5,044,488 | +5.4% | Paid | Record, stream and analyse every match automatically | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/veo-co.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/claude-2-vs-forma

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)