# clickworker vs QA.tech

clickworker records 1,861,149 monthly visits with +0.5% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. QA.tech records 30,550 monthly visits with -4.4% growth and Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [clickworker](https://openaitools.app/tool/clickworker-com) | [QA.tech](https://openaitools.app/tool/qa-tech) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://clickworker.com | https://qa.tech |
| Categories | AI Developer Tools, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI Face Recognition, AI Transcription | AI Testing, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI Productivity Tools |
| Pricing Model | Contact for Pricing | Paid, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 1,861,149 | 30,550 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +0.5% | -4.4% |
| Primary Market | United States | Sweden |
| Direct Visits | 947,133 | 21,231 |
| Review Score | 3.9 | 4.3 |
| Saved Count | 3 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## clickworker

clickworker is a data-services company that turns business data projects into structured microtasks carried out by a global crowd. Companies define a task — collecting shelf photos, labeling images, verifying addresses, running surveys, testing an app — and clickworker recruits, briefs and quality-checks the workers who complete it. The crowd numbers more than 10 million registered freelancers across 136 countries.

The core offering is AI training data: image, video, audio and text datasets with human-powered labeling, annotation and validation, delivered in cooperation with parent company LXT. Around that sit adjacent services such as surveys with a verified respondent pool, store checks and display audits at the point of sale, tagging and sentiment analysis, crowdtesting for websites and apps, list building, and SEO copywriting.

Engagements can be self-service, fully managed or delivered through an API and iframe integration. clickworker emphasizes its 20+ years of microtask experience, ISO 27001 certification and GDPR compliance, and works with clients such as OTTO, Bosch and Tennis-Point on large-scale data collection and evaluation projects.

**Pricing & Plans:** clickworker quotes project prices rather than publishing list rates; cost depends on task type, volume, target geography and quality requirements. A self-service option and a managed service are both available, and Clickworkers are paid per completed task.

- **AI training data at scale:** Custom image, video, audio and text datasets with human labeling, annotation and validation, delivered with parent company LXT.
- **Global crowd of 10M+ Clickworkers:** Registered freelancers in 136 countries fill microtasks through web, Android and iOS apps, with flexible scaling up or down.
- **Survey and market research services:** An all-in-one survey tool plus access to a verified respondent pool for external studies and targeted insights.
- **Store checks and crowdtesting:** Real-time point-of-sale data collection, display audits, mystery checks, and usability testing for websites, apps and games.
- **Managed, self-service and API delivery:** Choose a fully managed project, run tasks yourself, or integrate crowd workflows through API and iframe form options.

**Strengths:** Enormous, geographically diverse crowd that can scale projects up or down quickly; Covers the full data pipeline from collection through annotation and validation; ISO 27001 certified and GDPR compliant with documented quality assurance; Multiple engagement models: managed, self-service, API and iframe

**Limitations:** Pricing is quote-based, so smaller projects may struggle to get transparent costs; Quality depends on task design and briefing, which the client must invest effort in; Not a plug-and-play AI API — it is a services business requiring project scoping

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/clickworker-com.md)

## QA.tech

QA.tech positions itself as the verification layer for teams shipping software with heavy AI assistance: coding got much faster, but review and QA did not keep pace. Instead of maintaining a fragile library of selectors and scripts, QA.tech runs autonomous agents that open your live web or native mobile app, work toward goals the way a person would, and report back on what actually works before code is merged.,The product is built around continuous, dynamic testing rather than one-off suites. Connect GitHub, GitLab or Bitbucket and a CI provider, and agents automatically pick up each pull request together with its preview environment, run end-to-end and exploratory passes, and comment on the PR with results. When something fails, you get screenshots, console and network activity and the agent's reasoning at the point of failure, which shortens time to root cause considerably.,Testing is also context-aware over time. Journeys and domain rules you spell out in chat accumulate as knowledge the agents reuse on every later run, and a blast-radius view flags changes that ship untested because a required test user or journey is missing. The platform is cloud-native, needs no code access, and is targeted at QA leads, engineers, CTOs and DevOps teams; Vercel Ventures and founder investors back the company. Pricing is not published as a simple self-serve number — teams book a demo, though a free getting-started path is offered.

**Pricing & Plans:** Enterprise-style, contact-for-pricing model: the site offers a free getting-started path and a demo booking rather than public per-seat numbers, so exact costs depend on team size, coverage scope and mobile testing needs.

- **Plain-language test authoring:** Describe a journey or rule in chat and the agent turns it into durable test cases that survive refactors and redesigns.
- **PR-level verification:** Every pull request gets a dynamic exploratory pass with preview environments, failure breakdowns, screenshots, console and network logs.
- **Web and native mobile:** Agents target real browsers and native iOS and Android apps, so coverage reaches beyond the web front end.
- **CI, Git and issue-tracker integrations:** Findings flow into Jira and Linear, and agents can be queried over MCP by other coding agents.
- **Blast-radius analysis:** Detects when changes to a module are untested and recommends the exact journeys or test users needed to close the gap.

**Strengths:** Agents test visually without selectors, so suites survive redesigns and framework migrations; Runs automatically on every pull request with preview environments; Plain-English test authoring is accessible to non-engineers; Rich failure evidence — screenshots, logs, network data and agent reasoning

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/qa-tech.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do clickworker and QA.tech compare in monthly traffic?

clickworker has 1,861,149 monthly visits, while QA.tech has 30,550. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

clickworker has a month-over-month growth rate of +0.5%; QA.tech has -4.4%.

### How does pricing compare?

clickworker: Contact for Pricing. clickworker quotes project prices rather than publishing list rates; cost depends on task type, volume, target geography and quality requirements. A self-service option and a managed service are both available, and Clickworkers are paid per completed task. QA.tech: Paid, Contact for Pricing. Enterprise-style, contact-for-pricing model: the site offers a free getting-started path and a demo booking rather than public per-seat numbers, so exact costs depend on team size, coverage scope and mobile testing needs.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Prolific](https://openaitools.app/tool/prolific-com) | 18,697,671 | -1.8% | Paid | Offers a high-quality pool of verified human participants for research and preference tuning, but is less focused on traditional data annotation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/prolific-com.md) |
| 2 | [Outlier AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/outlier-ai) | 10,372,036 | +7.6% | Paid | Connects subject matter experts for advanced LLM training and prompting, but lacks general microtask crowdsourcing capabilities. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/outlier-ai.md) |
| 3 | [OpenTrain AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/opentrain-ai) | 1,469,348 | +11.2% | Contact for Pricing | Specializes in matching AI labs with vetted human experts for RLHF, but offers fewer general data annotation services. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/opentrain-ai.md) |
| 4 | [KaneAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai) | 901,340 | +13.2% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | GenAI-native end-to-end QA agent that plans, writes and heals tests in plain language | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kaneai.md) |
| 5 | [Appen](https://openaitools.app/tool/appen-com) | 665,840 | +0.2% | Contact for Pricing | Provides enterprise-grade data annotation and training datasets at scale, but with a more corporate engagement model. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/appen-com.md) |
| 6 | [Qase](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase) | 319,213 | -25.5% | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Ship with confidence: one system of record for manual, automated, and CI tests | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qase.md) |
| 7 | [Surge AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/surgehq-ai) | 245,142 | +6.6% | Contact for Pricing | Focuses on elite domain experts for complex RLHF and frontier AI evaluation, but lacks casual crowdsourcing tasks. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/surgehq-ai.md) |
| 8 | [Katalon](https://openaitools.app/tool/katalon-studio) | 158,090 | -29.6% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | AI-augmented quality platform for web, mobile, API and desktop testing | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/katalon-studio.md) |
| 9 | [TestSprite](https://openaitools.app/tool/testsprite) | 114,205 | +15.8% | Freemium | Agentic end-to-end testing that writes, runs and heals your test suite | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/testsprite.md) |
| 10 | [testRigor](https://openaitools.app/tool/testrigor-com) | 105,865 | -2.7% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Write end-to-end test automation in plain English, no code required | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/testrigor-com.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/clickworker-com-vs-qa-tech

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)