# CodeGPT vs Cursor

CodeGPT records 170,064 monthly visits with -19% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing. Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [CodeGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/code-gpt) | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://codegpt.co | https://www.cursor.com |
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Code Assistant, AI Code Review, AI Code Generator | AI Code Assistant, AI Developer Tools, AI Agent |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 170,064 | 23,297,751 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -19% | +8.4% |
| Primary Market | India | United States |
| Direct Visits | 92,071 | 14,683,770 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 4.7 |
| Saved Count | 3 | 29 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## CodeGPT

CodeGPT is an AI coding agent distributed as extensions for Visual Studio Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ, PyCharm and others) and Visual Studio. Rather than only offering inline completions, it reads your codebase first, drafts a plan you can edit, and then writes code — showing each file it reads and each edit it proposes so you approve every change before anything mutates. The project advertises more than two million installs and references teams at large enterprises among its users.

The product's defining characteristic is its bring-your-own-key (BYOK) model. You can connect Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok or local open models served through Ollama and LM Studio, swapping models per task while your code stays in place. If you prefer not to manage keys, CodeGPT also sells credits, and its published tiers are a free plan with a handful of daily interactions, a Professional plan for a single developer and a Teams plan billed per seat with pooled credits and an admin dashboard. Enterprise and AI-first services engagements are available on request.

Beyond chat and code generation, CodeGPT ships agent tooling such as MCP connections to external APIs, docs and databases, project rules for consistent standards, live context tracking and a terminal tool that runs commands only after your approval. Privacy-first architecture is central to the pitch: code stays under your control unless you deliberately route it to a cloud model you have configured yourself.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free tier with limited daily interactions on economy models plus a small welcome credit for premium models. Professional is about $10/month (roughly $9/month billed yearly) with unlimited economy-model use and a monthly premium allowance; Teams is about $30 per user per month ($27 yearly) with pooled credits and admin controls. Bring-your-own-key usage is unlimited, and Enterprise pricing is quoted on request.

- **Model-agnostic BYOK:** Connect Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok or local Ollama/LM Studio models with your own API keys, or use CodeGPT credits, and switch models per task without moving your code.
- **Plan-then-build agent:** The agent reads your codebase, proposes a plan you can edit, and writes code only after you approve each step, keeping you in control of every change.
- **Full context visibility:** Watch which files are read, which options are weighed and which edits are suggested, with live tracking of context usage and no hidden limits.
- **MCP integrations and rules:** Bridge the agent to external APIs, documentation and databases through MCP, and define project rules so generated code follows your standards.
- **Terminal with approval gate:** Let the agent run commands in your terminal while waiting for explicit approval before anything is executed or mutated.

**Strengths:** Works across VS Code, JetBrains and Visual Studio from one vendor; Bring-your-own-key model removes usage metering and vendor lock-in; Approval-before-edit flow and visible context tracking build trust; Supports both cloud frontier models and local Ollama/LM Studio models

**Limitations:** Premium model access still requires credits unless you supply your own keys; Free plan is capped at a small number of daily interactions on economy models; Advanced agent workflows take time to configure well

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/code-gpt.md)

## Cursor

Cursor's editor looks familiar to anyone who has used a modern IDE, but the center of gravity is the agent. Instead of only suggesting the next line, it can read a task description, inspect the repository, produce an implementation plan, modify many files, run commands, and report back with a summary of what changed. Developers keep control by approving plans, reviewing diffs, and stepping in wherever judgment is needed.

The product has expanded well beyond a single application. Cloud agents can run on their own machines for extended periods, Cursor ships a CLI, and integrations bring the same agent into Slack and GitHub so work can be handed off without switching tools. A model picker lets you use frontier models from several providers, or rely on automatic selection per task.

This makes Cursor a good fit for teams that want measurable velocity gains on large codebases while keeping human review in the loop. The trade-offs are mostly about cost and process: capable agents consume quota, remote indexing raises questions for security-conscious organizations, and teams need light conventions for when to delegate versus write code directly.

**Pricing & Plans:** Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

- **Agent-driven code changes:** An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.
- **Cloud and parallel agents:** Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.
- **Tab completion and codebase context:** Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.
- **Multi-model flexibility:** Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.
- **CLI, Slack and GitHub workflows:** Run Cursor from the terminal, chat with it in Slack, and let it review or open pull requests in GitHub without leaving your workflow.

**Strengths:** Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits; Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub; Choose from multiple frontier models in one place; Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors

**Limitations:** Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage; Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively; Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly; Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do CodeGPT and Cursor compare in monthly traffic?

CodeGPT has 170,064 monthly visits, while Cursor has 23,297,751. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

CodeGPT has a month-over-month growth rate of -19%; Cursor has +8.4%.

### How does pricing compare?

CodeGPT: Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Free tier with limited daily interactions on economy models plus a small welcome credit for premium models. Professional is about $10/month (roughly $9/month billed yearly) with unlimited economy-model use and a monthly premium allowance; Teams is about $30 per user per month ($27 yearly) with pooled credits and admin controls. Bring-your-own-key usage is unlimited, and Enterprise pricing is quoted on request. Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 2 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Enables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 3 | [VS Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code) | 7,397,370 | -3.8% | Freemium | Offers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code.md) |
| 4 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 5 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 6 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 7 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 8 | [Pi Coding Agent](https://openaitools.app/tool/pi-coding-agent) | 1,929,244 | +4% | Free | A lightweight terminal coding agent supporting multiple model providers, tailored for command-line power users. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/pi-coding-agent.md) |
| 9 | [T3 Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/t3-code) | 1,071,866 | +52.5% | Free | An open-source control plane for orchestrating multiple coding agents, offering more flexibility than single IDE plugins. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/t3-code.md) |
| 10 | [CodeRabbit](https://openaitools.app/tool/coderabbit) | 1,048,880 | +4.6% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Automates deep code reviews on pull requests, whereas CodeGPT focuses primarily on active in-editor generation and refactoring. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/coderabbit.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/code-gpt-vs-cursor

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)