# CodeGPT vs Trae

CodeGPT records 170,064 monthly visits with -19% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing. Trae records 702,366 monthly visits with -7.8% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [CodeGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/code-gpt) | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://codegpt.co | https://www.trae.ai |
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Code Assistant, AI Code Review, AI Code Generator | AI Code Assistant, AI Code Generator, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 170,064 | 702,366 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -19% | -7.8% |
| Primary Market | India | China |
| Direct Visits | 92,071 | 373,236 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 4.7 |
| Saved Count | 3 | 6 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## CodeGPT

CodeGPT is an AI coding agent distributed as extensions for Visual Studio Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ, PyCharm and others) and Visual Studio. Rather than only offering inline completions, it reads your codebase first, drafts a plan you can edit, and then writes code — showing each file it reads and each edit it proposes so you approve every change before anything mutates. The project advertises more than two million installs and references teams at large enterprises among its users.

The product's defining characteristic is its bring-your-own-key (BYOK) model. You can connect Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok or local open models served through Ollama and LM Studio, swapping models per task while your code stays in place. If you prefer not to manage keys, CodeGPT also sells credits, and its published tiers are a free plan with a handful of daily interactions, a Professional plan for a single developer and a Teams plan billed per seat with pooled credits and an admin dashboard. Enterprise and AI-first services engagements are available on request.

Beyond chat and code generation, CodeGPT ships agent tooling such as MCP connections to external APIs, docs and databases, project rules for consistent standards, live context tracking and a terminal tool that runs commands only after your approval. Privacy-first architecture is central to the pitch: code stays under your control unless you deliberately route it to a cloud model you have configured yourself.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free tier with limited daily interactions on economy models plus a small welcome credit for premium models. Professional is about $10/month (roughly $9/month billed yearly) with unlimited economy-model use and a monthly premium allowance; Teams is about $30 per user per month ($27 yearly) with pooled credits and admin controls. Bring-your-own-key usage is unlimited, and Enterprise pricing is quoted on request.

- **Model-agnostic BYOK:** Connect Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok or local Ollama/LM Studio models with your own API keys, or use CodeGPT credits, and switch models per task without moving your code.
- **Plan-then-build agent:** The agent reads your codebase, proposes a plan you can edit, and writes code only after you approve each step, keeping you in control of every change.
- **Full context visibility:** Watch which files are read, which options are weighed and which edits are suggested, with live tracking of context usage and no hidden limits.
- **MCP integrations and rules:** Bridge the agent to external APIs, documentation and databases through MCP, and define project rules so generated code follows your standards.
- **Terminal with approval gate:** Let the agent run commands in your terminal while waiting for explicit approval before anything is executed or mutated.

**Strengths:** Works across VS Code, JetBrains and Visual Studio from one vendor; Bring-your-own-key model removes usage metering and vendor lock-in; Approval-before-edit flow and visible context tracking build trust; Supports both cloud frontier models and local Ollama/LM Studio models

**Limitations:** Premium model access still requires credits unless you supply your own keys; Free plan is capped at a small number of daily interactions on economy models; Advanced agent workflows take time to configure well

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/code-gpt.md)

## Trae

Trae is an AI development platform that puts a coding agent at the centre of the editing experience. Its main product, TraeCode, is a full IDE with an integrated AI panel: instead of merely completing the next line, the assistant can inspect your project, reason about the change you want, edit several files at once, and run commands to verify the result. The diff-based review flow keeps you in charge of what is applied.

The stated positioning is "Collaborate with Intelligence" — the assistant works alongside you rather than replacing the editor. Practical uses include generating boilerplate and new modules, refactoring messy code, explaining an unfamiliar repository, fixing failing tests, and translating a plain-language task into working changes. Because the agent has project context, results tend to be more coherent across a codebase than single-file completion.

Alongside TraeCode, TraeWork applies the same assistant model to general work tasks, so the platform covers both engineering and everyday productivity. Trae ships as a desktop download and can also be used in the browser, making it easy to adopt without disrupting a whole toolchain.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free to start, with paid upgrades that increase usage limits for premium models; enterprises can purchase through BytePlus. Usage is measured per AI request and varies by model, so heavy users should review the pricing page for current allowances before committing.

- **Project-aware code context:** Trae reads your project files and dependencies, so its suggestions account for how the codebase is actually structured rather than treating each file in isolation.
- **Agentic code generation and edits:** Describe a task and the agent plans and applies multi-file edits, shows a diff for review, and can run terminal commands as part of the change.
- **Debugging and code explanation:** Ask questions about unfamiliar code, get inline explanations, and have bugs or failing tests diagnosed and fixed with context.
- **TraeCode plus TraeWork:** TraeCode covers the coding workflow, while TraeWork applies an AI assistant to everyday knowledge tasks — both download for desktop, with a web option.
- **Free start with upgradable limits:** You can try it for free and scale up by choosing the plan that raises your usage limits, with enterprise options available.

**Strengths:** Free tier makes it easy to evaluate before paying; Agentic workflow handles multi-file changes and tests, not just autocomplete; Deep project context improves the relevance of suggestions; Covers both coding (TraeCode) and general work (TraeWork)

**Limitations:** Heavy usage of premium models quickly hits plan limits; It is a newer entrant, so some integrations and plugins are still maturing; Most of the polish is in the coding flow; other workflows are less developed; Usage-based limits can be confusing to predict for large teams

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do CodeGPT and Trae compare in monthly traffic?

CodeGPT has 170,064 monthly visits, while Trae has 702,366. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

CodeGPT has a month-over-month growth rate of -19%; Trae has -7.8%.

### How does pricing compare?

CodeGPT: Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Free tier with limited daily interactions on economy models plus a small welcome credit for premium models. Professional is about $10/month (roughly $9/month billed yearly) with unlimited economy-model use and a monthly premium allowance; Teams is about $30 per user per month ($27 yearly) with pooled credits and admin controls. Bring-your-own-key usage is unlimited, and Enterprise pricing is quoted on request. Trae: Freemium. Free to start, with paid upgrades that increase usage limits for premium models; enterprises can purchase through BytePlus. Usage is measured per AI request and varies by model, so heavy users should review the pricing page for current allowances before committing.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Claude](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2) | 1,253,439,413 | +23.8% | Freemium | Anthropic's frontier AI workspace powered by Claude 5.5 for agentic coding, analysis, and nuanced writing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2.md) |
| 2 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | Offers much deeper IDE integration and superior multi-file editing, but requires a paid subscription for full features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) |
| 3 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Google's agent-first development platform for building and shipping software with AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 4 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Excels at instant browser-based cloud deployment and full-stack app generation, but is less suited for heavy local multi-repo workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 5 | [VS Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code) | 7,397,370 | -3.8% | Freemium | Provides ultimate extensibility and open-source flexibility, but requires assembling your own extension stack to match Trae's native AI features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code.md) |
| 6 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Provides powerful codebase-wide agentic planning and completion, but operates primarily as a plugin rather than a dedicated IDE. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 7 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Uses rigorous spec-driven engineering plans to verify changes, though with a more structured and rigid workflow than Trae. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 8 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer that opens pull requests, but is much more expensive and task-oriented. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 9 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Focuses on terminal-first workflows with open-weight models, but lacks the graphical multi-file interface of Trae. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 10 | [Pi Coding Agent](https://openaitools.app/tool/pi-coding-agent) | 1,929,244 | +4% | Free | A lightweight terminal coding agent supporting multiple model providers, tailored for command-line power users. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/pi-coding-agent.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/code-gpt-vs-trae

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)