# CodeGPT vs Window AI

CodeGPT records 170,064 monthly visits with -19% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing. Window AI records 0 monthly visits with — growth and Free pricing.

| Metric | [CodeGPT](https://openaitools.app/tool/code-gpt) | [Window AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/window-ai) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://codegpt.co | https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/window-ai/cbhbgmdpcoelfdoihppookkijpmgahag |
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Code Assistant, AI Code Review, AI Code Generator | AI API, AI Models, AI Developer Tools, AI Text Generator |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 170,064 | 0 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -19% | — |
| Primary Market | India | Global |
| Direct Visits | 92,071 | 0 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 1.8 |
| Saved Count | 3 | 1 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Browser Extension |

## CodeGPT

CodeGPT is an AI coding agent distributed as extensions for Visual Studio Code, JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ, PyCharm and others) and Visual Studio. Rather than only offering inline completions, it reads your codebase first, drafts a plan you can edit, and then writes code — showing each file it reads and each edit it proposes so you approve every change before anything mutates. The project advertises more than two million installs and references teams at large enterprises among its users.

The product's defining characteristic is its bring-your-own-key (BYOK) model. You can connect Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok or local open models served through Ollama and LM Studio, swapping models per task while your code stays in place. If you prefer not to manage keys, CodeGPT also sells credits, and its published tiers are a free plan with a handful of daily interactions, a Professional plan for a single developer and a Teams plan billed per seat with pooled credits and an admin dashboard. Enterprise and AI-first services engagements are available on request.

Beyond chat and code generation, CodeGPT ships agent tooling such as MCP connections to external APIs, docs and databases, project rules for consistent standards, live context tracking and a terminal tool that runs commands only after your approval. Privacy-first architecture is central to the pitch: code stays under your control unless you deliberately route it to a cloud model you have configured yourself.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free tier with limited daily interactions on economy models plus a small welcome credit for premium models. Professional is about $10/month (roughly $9/month billed yearly) with unlimited economy-model use and a monthly premium allowance; Teams is about $30 per user per month ($27 yearly) with pooled credits and admin controls. Bring-your-own-key usage is unlimited, and Enterprise pricing is quoted on request.

- **Model-agnostic BYOK:** Connect Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok or local Ollama/LM Studio models with your own API keys, or use CodeGPT credits, and switch models per task without moving your code.
- **Plan-then-build agent:** The agent reads your codebase, proposes a plan you can edit, and writes code only after you approve each step, keeping you in control of every change.
- **Full context visibility:** Watch which files are read, which options are weighed and which edits are suggested, with live tracking of context usage and no hidden limits.
- **MCP integrations and rules:** Bridge the agent to external APIs, documentation and databases through MCP, and define project rules so generated code follows your standards.
- **Terminal with approval gate:** Let the agent run commands in your terminal while waiting for explicit approval before anything is executed or mutated.

**Strengths:** Works across VS Code, JetBrains and Visual Studio from one vendor; Bring-your-own-key model removes usage metering and vendor lock-in; Approval-before-edit flow and visible context tracking build trust; Supports both cloud frontier models and local Ollama/LM Studio models

**Limitations:** Premium model access still requires credits unless you supply your own keys; Free plan is capped at a small number of daily interactions on economy models; Advanced agent workflows take time to configure well

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/code-gpt.md)

## Window AI

Window AI takes the position that the model choice should belong to the user, not the website. You install the extension, add the providers you already pay for or run locally, and from then on any compatible site can ask for permission to send a prompt to the model you picked. The extension shows you the request and lets you approve or deny it, which keeps a visible record of where your text is going.

For end users the appeal is portability: set up a local Llama or GPT4All runtime, a Claude key and a GPT-4 key once, and switch between them everywhere. For developers the appeal is different. Instead of paying for and rate-limiting a shared API key, an app can ask the user's browser for a model, which removes a large part of the backend cost and lets users try an app for free with their own credentials. Supported text models at release included GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, PaLM 2 Chat and Code Chat, Claude and Claude Instant, Together's GPT-NeoXT-20B and Cohere Xlarge, plus the open local runtimes, with OpenAI's Shape-E covering early text-to-3D generation.

The extension is free and carries no subscription. Its published build dates from July 2023, so it sits in the early wave of model-agnostic tooling rather than at the cutting edge of today's model landscape; the provider list reflects that era. It remains installable and useful, particularly as an illustration of the bring-your-own-model pattern that later appeared in many AI developer platforms.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free to install and use. You cover only the costs of whichever model provider you connect; local models are free beyond your own hardware. No subscription is sold for the extension itself.

- **Bring your own model:** Configure your models and credentials once inside the extension, then use them on every compatible site without re-entering keys.
- **Cloud and local inference:** Point the extension at hosted providers or at a local runtime such as GPT4All or Llama, keeping prompts on your own machine when privacy matters.
- **Per-site permission prompts:** Compatible apps ask for explicit permission before a prompt is sent, and you can see exactly what is being asked and when.
- **Model-agnostic API for builders:** Developers get a single integration path across OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Together, Cohere and local runtimes instead of wiring up each API separately.

**Strengths:** One configuration covers every site built on the standard; Supports hosted and local models in the same interface; Explicit permission prompts keep you aware of what is sent where; No extension subscription cost

**Limitations:** No longer actively updated, with the last release from mid-2023; Model list reflects 2023 providers and omits newer frontier models; Adoption depends on developers building against the standard

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/window-ai.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do CodeGPT and Window AI compare in monthly traffic?

CodeGPT has 170,064 monthly visits, while Window AI has 0. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

CodeGPT has a month-over-month growth rate of -19%; Window AI has —.

### How does pricing compare?

CodeGPT: Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Free tier with limited daily interactions on economy models plus a small welcome credit for premium models. Professional is about $10/month (roughly $9/month billed yearly) with unlimited economy-model use and a monthly premium allowance; Teams is about $30 per user per month ($27 yearly) with pooled credits and admin controls. Bring-your-own-key usage is unlimited, and Enterprise pricing is quoted on request. Window AI: Free. Free to install and use. You cover only the costs of whichever model provider you connect; local models are free beyond your own hardware. No subscription is sold for the extension itself.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Tripo AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/tripo-ai) | 25,209,679 | +73.2% | Freemium | Create 3D models from text and images in seconds | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/tripo-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | An entire AI-native IDE built on VS Code, offering deeper multi-file editing than standard extensions. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) |
| 3 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | A comprehensive agentic development suite by Google for running parallel coding agents, but requires a separate environment. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 4 | [Ollama](https://openaitools.app/tool/ollama) | 9,421,973 | +4.3% | Free, Freemium, Paid | Run and build with open AI models locally or in the cloud | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ollama.md) |
| 5 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Reads entire codebases to execute complex multi-file tasks as an IDE plugin, similar to CodeGPT. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 6 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | A spec-driven AI IDE from AWS that plans and verifies engineering work, but requires switching editors. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 7 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Optimized for running open-weight models in the terminal, focusing on personal coding preference adaptation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 8 | [Pi Coding Agent](https://openaitools.app/tool/pi-coding-agent) | 1,929,244 | +4% | Free | A lightweight terminal coding agent supporting multiple model providers, tailored for command-line power users. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/pi-coding-agent.md) |
| 9 | [T3 Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/t3-code) | 1,071,866 | +52.5% | Free | An open-source control plane for orchestrating multiple coding agents, offering more flexibility than single IDE plugins. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/t3-code.md) |
| 10 | [CodeRabbit](https://openaitools.app/tool/coderabbit) | 1,048,880 | +4.6% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Automates deep code reviews on pull requests, whereas CodeGPT focuses primarily on active in-editor generation and refactoring. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/coderabbit.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/code-gpt-vs-window-ai

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)