# Coder vs Rivet.dev

Coder records 149,417 monthly visits with -12.8% month-over-month growth and Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free pricing. Rivet.dev records 21,359 monthly visits with -44.3% growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Coder](https://openaitools.app/tool/coder) | [Rivet.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/rivet-dev) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://coder.com | https://rivet.dev |
| Categories | AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI Code Assistant | AI Agent, AI Workflow, AI Developer Tools, AI App Builder |
| Pricing Model | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Freemium, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 149,417 | 21,359 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -12.8% | -44.3% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 63,190 | 10,710 |
| Review Score | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Coder

Coder began as a way to replace heavyweight virtual desktop infrastructure and inconsistent local setups with self-hosted cloud development environments. Workspaces are described in Terraform, so an engineering platform team defines the image, resources and allowed integrations once, and every developer gets an identical environment provisioned in minutes. Because code never leaves the network, security teams get the network isolation and access control they demand in regulated industries.\n\nThe platform has expanded into the agentic development era. Alongside workspaces, Coder offers Coder Agents — a native AI coding agent that can run with the model of your choosing on infrastructure you control — and Coder AI Governance, a centralized gateway that observes and enforces policy on LLM tool usage across environments. The combined pitch is that developers can use any model or agent they like while the organization keeps audit logging, permission boundaries and spend visibility.\n\nCoder is widely used in government, financial services, technology and other regulated sectors, with published case studies covering the US Department of Defense, Dropbox, J.B. Hunt, Palantir and Discord. It is distributed as an open-source core with premium enterprise features, a homelab license option and integrations for VS Code, JetBrains, Backstage, Cursor, Kiro, Devin and dev containers.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free tier plus a commercial offering: an open-source edition you can self-host at no cost, premium/enterprise plans with governance, SSO and support, a free trial, and a homelab license for personal use. Enterprise pricing is quoted on request, so contact sales for current figures.

- **Self-hosted cloud workspaces:** Provision standardized, ephemeral development environments on your own cloud or data center infrastructure, defined as code with Terraform.
- **Coder Agents:** Run a native AI coding agent with the LLM of your choice, on secure, network-isolated infrastructure your team controls.
- **AI governance and audit:** A centralized gateway observes LLM tool usage across environments and enforces policy, giving security teams visibility and auditability.
- **IDE and tool integrations:** Connect VS Code, JetBrains, Cursor, Backstage, Devin, Kiro and dev containers so developers keep familiar workflows.
- **Cost and resource controls:** Centralize resource templates, shut down idle workspaces and cut the cost of VDI and laptop refresh cycles.

**Strengths:** Keeps code and models on infrastructure you own, which appeals to security and compliance teams; Environment-as-code approach removes configuration drift and speeds onboarding; Both workspace and AI-agent governance in one platform, rather than bolting them together; Strong enterprise track record with published case studies in government, finance and tech

**Limitations:** Self-hosting means real operational responsibility: someone on your team has to run it; Enterprise governance features require the paid tiers and a sales conversation; Configuration via Terraform is powerful but has a learning curve for small teams

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/coder.md)

## Rivet.dev

At its core Rivet replaces the container per agent with an in-process primitive. An Actor runs inside your existing Node.js or Bun backend rather than in its own container or VM, which is why Rivet reports cold starts measured in single-digit milliseconds and a footprint of tens of kilobytes per Actor instead of hundreds of megabytes. Each Actor carries a SQLite database for memory, can access a filesystem and shell, sleeps when idle, and wakes with its durable state ready for the next request.

The platform handles the operational pieces teams usually build themselves: fault tolerance that reschedules Actors when a node goes down, multi-region placement that routes requests to wherever an Actor currently lives, end-to-end type safety where Actor definitions generate client types, and scheduling via cron or self-set timestamps. Storage is pulled apart into two tiers — a fast SSD for instant writes and object storage that settles writes at a fraction of the cost — so running many small databases stays affordable.

Rivet positions itself as infrastructure for the "agentic era" and can be deployed as a managed cloud, inside your own VPC through a bring-your-own-cloud model, or fully self-hosted down to air-gapped networks. It is open source under Apache 2.0, backed by Y Combinator and a16z Speedrun, and integrates with popular coding agents and frameworks.

**Pricing & Plans:** Rivet Cloud uses a plan-plus-nodes model. The control plane is Free ($0) for prototyping, Hobby at $10/month, Team at $120/month, and Enterprise at $900/month, each raising control-plane redundancy, Actor Node caps, and support. Actor Nodes are billed per month on top, from $4.20 (R-5) to $94.50 (R-160). Self-hosting is free and open source under Apache 2.0, and startups from Y Combinator or a16z Speedrun get 50% off the Team plan for 12 months.

- **Durable actors with persistent state:** Every Actor gets a SQLite database and a filesystem, so an agent's memory and progress survive restarts and idle periods without a separate database.
- **Lightweight secure sandboxing:** Run untrusted or AI-generated code on your own infrastructure with fine-grained control over network access, filesystem permissions, and resource limits.
- **Fault tolerance and workflows:** A node failure reschedules its Actors elsewhere with state intact, and multi-step work replays after a crash — with no checkpointing harness to build yourself.
- **Realtime and multiplayer:** Address an Actor directly over HTTP or hold a live WebSocket, and use the React SDK to subscribe components to an Actor's state in real time.
- **One-binary deployment and observability:** Ship with a single stateless Rust binary, embeds storage in S3-compatible buckets, and emits OpenTelemetry traces, metrics, and logs to your existing collector.

**Strengths:** Four-digit millisecond cold starts and a very small per-Actor memory footprint let a single server host far more agents; Open source (Apache 2.0) with a single Rust binary, so it can be self-hosted, run in a VPC, or air-gapped; Durable state via per-Actor SQLite plus object-storage-backed tiers keeps agents restart-safe and cheap; Strong developer ergonomics: typed SDKs, a React SDK, WebSocket networking, and OpenTelemetry baked in

**Limitations:** Requires Node.js or Bun and a working Rust-based control plane deployment for self-hosting, so it favors backend engineers over no-code users; Advanced durability and sandboxing concepts (Actors, WarpDrive storage) carry a learning curve; Managed cloud cost scales with Actor Nodes, which can climb for many mid-sized/sized nodes; Enterprise features like multi-tenancy and hardened compliance guidance sit behind sales conversations

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/rivet-dev.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Coder and Rivet.dev compare in monthly traffic?

Coder has 149,417 monthly visits, while Rivet.dev has 21,359. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Coder has a month-over-month growth rate of -12.8%; Rivet.dev has -44.3%.

### How does pricing compare?

Coder: Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free. Free tier plus a commercial offering: an open-source edition you can self-host at no cost, premium/enterprise plans with governance, SSO and support, a free trial, and a homelab license for personal use. Enterprise pricing is quoted on request, so contact sales for current figures. Rivet.dev: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Rivet Cloud uses a plan-plus-nodes model. The control plane is Free ($0) for prototyping, Hobby at $10/month, Team at $120/month, and Enterprise at $900/month, each raising control-plane redundancy, Actor Node caps, and support. Actor Nodes are billed per month on top, from $4.20 (R-5) to $94.50 (R-160). Self-hosting is free and open source under Apache 2.0, and startups from Y Combinator or a16z Speedrun get 50% off the Team plan for 12 months.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | AI-native code editor optimized for multi-file coding agents, but lacks Coder's enterprise cloud workspace provisioning. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) |
| 2 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Agentic development platform with IDE and CLI for parallel AI coding agents, but less focused on infrastructure self-hosting. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 3 | [RunPod](https://openaitools.app/tool/runpod) | 2,881,043 | +5.9% | Paid | Rents raw GPU infrastructure for AI workloads, but requires manual setup compared to Coder's managed workspaces. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/runpod.md) |
| 4 | [Modal](https://openaitools.app/tool/modal-com) | 1,196,021 | +30.2% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Serverless cloud container platform for running Python code and AI jobs, but lacks developer workspace management features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/modal-com.md) |
| 5 | [Mastra](https://openaitools.app/tool/mastra) | 318,954 | -5% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The TypeScript framework for building, deploying, and observing AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mastra.md) |
| 6 | [Agent 37](https://openaitools.app/tool/agent-37) | 180,030 | +24.2% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | The low-cost cloud sandbox where AI agents actually live | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/agent-37.md) |
| 7 | [boat](https://openaitools.app/tool/boat) | 66,870 | +520.8% | Free Trial, Paid | Persistent Ubuntu cloud VMs built for AI agent factories | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/boat.md) |
| 8 | [InsForge](https://openaitools.app/tool/insforge) | 60,257 | -11.3% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing, Free | Agent-native cloud infrastructure that lets coding agents run the whole backend stack | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/insforge.md) |
| 9 | [exe.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/exe-dev) | 60,103 | -26.4% | Freemium, Paid | Cloud Linux VMs built for developers and their AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/exe-dev.md) |
| 10 | [FlexAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/flexai) | 44,314 | +17.9% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Build, run and scale AI, from open models to governed agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/flexai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/coder-vs-rivet-dev

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)