# CoGrader vs EasyMark

CoGrader records 142,008 monthly visits with +31.1% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free pricing. EasyMark records 1,263 monthly visits with -46.1% growth and Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [CoGrader](https://openaitools.app/tool/cograder) | [EasyMark](https://openaitools.app/tool/easymark) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://cograder.com | https://www.easymark.ai |
| Categories | AI Checker Essay, AI Assistant, AI Teachers, AI Homework Helper | AI Checker Essay, AI Teachers, AI Productivity Tools, AI Homework Helper |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 142,008 | 1,263 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +31.1% | -46.1% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 66,666 | 384 |
| Review Score | 4.3 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 1 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## CoGrader

CoGrader turns the slowest part of teaching into a few minutes of review. You import an assignment from Google Classroom, Canvas, Schoology, Brightspace, Blackboard, or a plain upload of PDF, DOCX, or photos of handwriting. Then you attach a rubric — one from the built-in library of 500+ standards-aligned rubrics, or your own — and CoGrader scores every submission against that rubric, writing a comment for each criterion that tells the student what worked and what to fix next.

What separates CoGrader from generic chatbots is the evidence layer. The team publishes a validation study against official Texas STAAR raters where scores landed within one point of a human rater in 98.3% of cases and matched exactly 80.4% of the time, alongside an IES research award from the U.S. Department of Education and field studies in real districts. Teachers still approve every score and comment before students see it, so the AI drafts and the educator decides.

Beyond the core grader there is handwriting support that sorts scanned pages by student, an originality checker for plagiarism and AI-written text, a rubric generator aligned to state standards, class dashboards showing which criteria the whole class struggled with, and free tools students can use on their own essays. It is used by a reported 100,000+ teachers across 16,000+ US schools.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. The Starter plan is free forever for teachers and covers 150 student submissions per month, rubric building and sharing, FERPA compliance, and LMS integration. The Individual plan is $19/month, or $15/month billed annually, and raises the cap to 350 submissions with grammar checking, plagiarism and AI detection, and a class performance dashboard. Schools & Districts and Higher Ed & Enterprise plans are quoted based on size and add unlimited submissions, bulk user management, institution-wide analytics, API access, and onboarding. Educators can also earn the Individual plan free through the Advocate program.

- **Rubric-based AI grading:** Score essays and open-ended responses against your own rubric or one of 500+ standards-aligned rubrics, with a written comment for every criterion.
- **Handwritten assignment support:** Photograph paper essays from your phone or the copier, and CoGrader reads the handwriting, groups pages by student, and grades the whole set.
- **Two-way LMS sync:** Import submissions from Google Classroom, Canvas, Schoology, Brightspace, Blackboard, DMAC, and more, then push grades and feedback straight back.
- **Originality and AI detection:** Flag possible AI-assisted writing and check submissions for plagiarism before you return feedback.
- **Class analytics dashboard:** See average scores by criterion and surface which skills the class as a whole needs reteaching on.

**Strengths:** Validation against official state raters is published with numbers, not just claims; Teachers approve every score and comment before students see anything; Generous free tier and full LMS integrations make it easy to pilot; Handwriting support is rare and genuinely useful for paper-based classrooms

**Limitations:** Free tier caps out at 150 submissions per month, which heavy graders will exceed; Plagiarism and AI detection sit on the paid Individual plan; Some features are strongest for US standards, so non-US teachers get less from the rubric library

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cograder.md)

## EasyMark

EasyMark positions itself as a personal AI essay grader for English teachers. Instead of working through a stack of papers by hand, a teacher uploads essays in whatever format students submit them — PDFs, photos, or scans — and the platform returns graded output in roughly half a minute. The marketing claims teachers grade roughly 10x more essays in the same time, with a stated ceiling of up to 750 essays per month on paid tiers.

The distinguishing feature is customization of the grading standard itself. EasyMark lets instructors define their own rubrics and grading scales, so AI feedback tracks a teacher's actual expectations rather than a generic scoring model. Output includes a structured list of writing errors, per-essay improvement suggestions, and reasoning behind the assigned grade — useful when a student or parent asks why a paper received the mark it did.

Beyond grading, the site addresses practical classroom concerns: supported file types, education levels and essay types covered, supported languages, and how student writing is handled with respect to data security. A blog and about page provide supporting material. The product targets secondary and higher-education writing instruction, and it publishes a freemium entry point alongside paid tiers, plus a contact-for-pricing option for larger institutions.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium model with a free starting tier and paid plans; larger or institutional needs are handled through contact-for-pricing. Specific dollar amounts are not published on the landing page.

- **AI essay grading in ~30 seconds:** Upload an essay and receive graded feedback in about half a minute instead of marking it line by line.
- **Custom rubrics and grading scales:** Define your own criteria and weighting so the AI grades according to your standards, not a generic template.
- **PDF, image, and scan support:** Students can submit typed PDFs or photographed and scanned handwritten papers without conversion.
- **Detailed error and improvement lists:** Each essay comes back with categorized writing errors plus concrete suggestions for improvement.
- **High-volume processing:** Paid tiers advertise capacity of up to 750 graded essays per month for teachers with heavy workloads.

**Strengths:** Cuts grading turnaround from hours to minutes per batch; Grades against your own rubric rather than a fixed generic scale; Accepts scans and photos, so handwritten work is supported; Provides a written rationale for grades, which helps explain marks to students

**Limitations:** AI feedback still needs human review before final grades are released; Pricing details are not fully transparent on the public site; Performance may vary for highly creative or unconventional essay formats

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/easymark.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do CoGrader and EasyMark compare in monthly traffic?

CoGrader has 142,008 monthly visits, while EasyMark has 1,263. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

CoGrader has a month-over-month growth rate of +31.1%; EasyMark has -46.1%.

### How does pricing compare?

CoGrader: Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free. Freemium. The Starter plan is free forever for teachers and covers 150 student submissions per month, rubric building and sharing, FERPA compliance, and LMS integration. The Individual plan is $19/month, or $15/month billed annually, and raises the cap to 350 submissions with grammar checking, plagiarism and AI detection, and a class performance dashboard. Schools & Districts and Higher Ed & Enterprise plans are quoted based on size and add unlimited submissions, bulk user management, institution-wide analytics, API access, and onboarding. Educators can also earn the Individual plan free through the Advocate program. EasyMark: Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Freemium model with a free starting tier and paid plans; larger or institutional needs are handled through contact-for-pricing. Specific dollar amounts are not published on the landing page.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [GPTZero](https://openaitools.app/tool/gptzero-me) | 23,246,989 | +32.5% | Freemium, Paid | AI detection and writing verification built for schools and editors | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gptzero-me.md) |
| 2 | [MagicSchool AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/magicschool-ai) | 2,874,288 | +4.5% | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | AI tools that give teachers back their time | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/magicschool-ai.md) |
| 3 | [Originality.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/originality) | 2,049,639 | +2.8% | Paid | AI detector, plagiarism and content-quality checks in one scan | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/originality.md) |
| 4 | [Packback](https://openaitools.app/tool/packback-co) | 746,168 | -14% | Contact for Pricing | Make student thinking visible with AI-supported discussion and writing | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/packback-co.md) |
| 5 | [SchoolAI](https://openaitools.app/tool/school-ai) | 383,195 | +33.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing, Free | Builds interactive AI learning spaces for students rather than focusing strictly on automated essay grading. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/school-ai.md) |
| 6 | [Breakout Learning](https://openaitools.app/tool/breakoutlearning-com) | 160,279 | +18.2% | Contact for Pricing | AI-evaluated small-group discussions that replace discussion boards | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/breakoutlearning-com.md) |
| 7 | [EssayGrader](https://openaitools.app/tool/essaygrader) | 106,598 | +15.2% | Freemium | Grade an entire class of essays in minutes, with feedback students can act on | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/essaygrader.md) |
| 8 | [Studyable](https://openaitools.app/tool/studyable-app) | 72,371 | +13.6% | Free | Free AI homework help, tutors and flash cards | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/studyable-app.md) |
| 9 | [TimelyGrader](https://openaitools.app/tool/timelygrader) | 10,198 | +108.8% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | AI-assisted grading that keeps instructors in the loop | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/timelygrader.md) |
| 10 | [GradeLab](https://openaitools.app/tool/gradelab) | 8,871 | -4.3% | Contact for Pricing | AI grading platform that marks handwritten exams in minutes | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gradelab.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/cograder-vs-easymark

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)