# Cogram vs Consensus

Cogram records 4,376 monthly visits with -22.3% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Cogram](https://openaitools.app/tool/cogram) | [Consensus](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.cogram.com | https://consensus.app |
| Categories | AI Project Management, AI Meeting Assistant, AI Email Assistant, AI Report Generator | AI Search Engine, AI Research Tool, AI Papers, AI Article Summarizer |
| Pricing Model | Contact for Pricing | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 4,376 | 6,014,388 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -22.3% | -1.2% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 1,719 | 2,918,713 |
| Review Score | 4.2 | 4.7 |
| Saved Count | 1 | 31 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Cogram

>Cogram was founded in 2021 and is positioned as an AI-native alternative to the decades-old, pre-AI software stack that architecture and engineering firms still rely on. Rather than bolting a chatbot onto existing tools, Cogram rebuilds core project workflows around AI: an agent that reads and answers questions about project documents, email that files and searches itself, meeting minutes and field reports that draft into your templates, and structured RFI and submittal logs.

The platform is designed to fit around a firm's existing systems. It connects to communication tools such as Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Zoom and Google Meet, and to project and ERP platforms including Procore, Autodesk Construction Cloud, Deltek and Unanet, many of which can sync project data in. Cogram emphasizes controls as much as automation: it is SOC 2 Type II certified, supports SAML 2.0 SSO and MFA, uses AES-256 at-rest and TLS 1.3 in-transit encryption, offers optional private-cloud or on-prem storage, and states that no AI models are trained on customer data.

Cogram serves architects, engineers, consultants and general or specialty contractors, with offices referenced in San Francisco, New York, London and Berlin. Accessibility matters for adoption here, so the company offers a free 14-day self-serve trial, free guided trials with customer reference calls, and free external collaborator accounts. Commercial pricing is quoted per firm after a demo.

**Pricing & Plans:** Cogram uses contact/tailored pricing: a free 14-day self-serve trial and free guided trials are available, external collaborator accounts are free, and full pricing is provided after a demo.

- **Project AI Agent:** Ask natural-language questions across project documents, contracts and correspondence, and get answers grounded in your own files rather than generic responses.
- **Email Management:** Automatically file, organize and search email across all project correspondence so nothing gets lost in personal inboxes.
- **Automated Meeting Minutes:** Capture minutes in virtual and in-person meetings and have them drafted directly into your firm's templates.
- **RFIs & Submittals:** Log and review RFIs and submittals in a fast, user-friendly workflow that syncs with Procore and other project platforms.
- **Field Reports:** Record spoken observations and photos on site, then generate field reports inside your own document templates with minimal formatting.

**Strengths:** Purpose-built for architecture, engineering and construction rather than generic project management; Automates high-friction AEC paperwork: email filing, minutes, field reports, RFI and submittal logs; AI agent answers questions grounded in your own project documents; Strong security posture: SOC 2 Type II, SAML 2.0 SSO, MFA, encryption, and no model training on customer data

**Limitations:** Pricing is quote-based and requires a demo or sales conversation, so costs are not transparent upfront; Value depends on adoption across a whole project team, so partial rollouts may underdeliver; Deepest benefits come from integrations like Procore, Deltek and Unanet, which add setup effort; Feature scope is specialized for AEC workflows, offering less fit for unrelated industries

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cogram.md)

## Consensus

Consensus works like a scholarly search engine supercharged by AI. Instead of returning a flat list of PDFs, you ask a natural-language research question and Consensus extracts claims from relevant papers, then shows you what the studies actually find. A Consensus Meter summarizes the weight of evidence for yes/no questions, so you can see at a glance whether scientists largely agree, disagree, or remain divided.

The platform indexes hundreds of millions of peer-reviewed papers spanning medicine, biology, psychology, economics and more. Answers link straight back to the source studies, and you can filter by study design, journal quality, sample size and publication year to separate stronger evidence from weaker signals. Features like Deep Search, Topic Synthesis and Skills let researchers build a working knowledge base over time rather than starting from scratch on every query.

Consensus is designed for researchers, clinicians, students and analysts who need trustworthy signals from the scientific record without drowning in irrelevant results. A free tier gives limited AI-powered searches each month, while paid plans unlock unlimited use, advanced filters and deeper synthesis.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

- **Evidence-grounded answers:** Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
- **Consensus Meter:** A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
- **Powerful filters:** Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
- **Topic synthesis and Deep Search:** Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
- **Research workspace:** Save papers, organize sources and build a persistent knowledge base for literature reviews and ongoing projects.

**Strengths:** Answers cite real peer-reviewed papers, so claims are verifiable; Consensus Meter makes it easy to gauge scientific agreement at a glance; Rich filters help separate high-quality evidence from weaker studies; Fast, clean interface designed around research workflows

**Limitations:** Free tier caps the number of AI-assisted searches per month; Coverage is strongest for STEM and health fields, lighter for some humanities topics; It guides you toward sources but is not a substitute for reading full papers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Cogram and Consensus compare in monthly traffic?

Cogram has 4,376 monthly visits, while Consensus has 6,014,388. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Cogram has a month-over-month growth rate of -22.3%; Consensus has -1.2%.

### How does pricing compare?

Cogram: Contact for Pricing. Cogram uses contact/tailored pricing: a free 14-day self-serve trial and free guided trials are available, external collaborator accounts are free, and full pricing is provided after a demo. Consensus: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Notion](https://openaitools.app/tool/t) | 173,441,670 | +0.1% | Freemium | The AI workspace where teams and agents get work done together | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/t.md) |
| 2 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Covers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 3 | [Semantic Scholar](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar) | 8,198,672 | +5.8% | Free | Completely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar.md) |
| 4 | [Kagi Search](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search) | 4,647,605 | +3.2% | Free Trial, Paid | A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search.md) |
| 5 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 6 | [Elicit](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit) | 1,751,507 | +3.1% | Freemium | Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit.md) |
| 7 | [Dooray!](https://openaitools.app/tool/dooray) | 1,532,922 | -3.9% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | All-in-one Korean collaboration suite for teams and public institutions | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/dooray.md) |
| 8 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) |
| 9 | [Rayyan](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan) | 1,116,437 | +7.9% | Freemium | AI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan.md) |
| 10 | [Scite](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite) | 841,974 | +1.1% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/cogram-vs-consensus

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)