# Cogram vs Glean

Cogram records 4,376 monthly visits with -22.3% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. Glean records 3,301,875 monthly visits with +0.1% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Cogram](https://openaitools.app/tool/cogram) | [Glean](https://openaitools.app/tool/glean) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.cogram.com | https://www.glean.com |
| Categories | AI Project Management, AI Meeting Assistant, AI Email Assistant, AI Report Generator | AI Productivity Tools, AI Agent, AI Assistant, AI Search Engine |
| Pricing Model | Contact for Pricing | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 4,376 | 3,301,875 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -22.3% | +0.1% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 1,719 | 2,628,666 |
| Review Score | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Saved Count | 1 | 7 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Cogram

>Cogram was founded in 2021 and is positioned as an AI-native alternative to the decades-old, pre-AI software stack that architecture and engineering firms still rely on. Rather than bolting a chatbot onto existing tools, Cogram rebuilds core project workflows around AI: an agent that reads and answers questions about project documents, email that files and searches itself, meeting minutes and field reports that draft into your templates, and structured RFI and submittal logs.

The platform is designed to fit around a firm's existing systems. It connects to communication tools such as Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Zoom and Google Meet, and to project and ERP platforms including Procore, Autodesk Construction Cloud, Deltek and Unanet, many of which can sync project data in. Cogram emphasizes controls as much as automation: it is SOC 2 Type II certified, supports SAML 2.0 SSO and MFA, uses AES-256 at-rest and TLS 1.3 in-transit encryption, offers optional private-cloud or on-prem storage, and states that no AI models are trained on customer data.

Cogram serves architects, engineers, consultants and general or specialty contractors, with offices referenced in San Francisco, New York, London and Berlin. Accessibility matters for adoption here, so the company offers a free 14-day self-serve trial, free guided trials with customer reference calls, and free external collaborator accounts. Commercial pricing is quoted per firm after a demo.

**Pricing & Plans:** Cogram uses contact/tailored pricing: a free 14-day self-serve trial and free guided trials are available, external collaborator accounts are free, and full pricing is provided after a demo.

- **Project AI Agent:** Ask natural-language questions across project documents, contracts and correspondence, and get answers grounded in your own files rather than generic responses.
- **Email Management:** Automatically file, organize and search email across all project correspondence so nothing gets lost in personal inboxes.
- **Automated Meeting Minutes:** Capture minutes in virtual and in-person meetings and have them drafted directly into your firm's templates.
- **RFIs & Submittals:** Log and review RFIs and submittals in a fast, user-friendly workflow that syncs with Procore and other project platforms.
- **Field Reports:** Record spoken observations and photos on site, then generate field reports inside your own document templates with minimal formatting.

**Strengths:** Purpose-built for architecture, engineering and construction rather than generic project management; Automates high-friction AEC paperwork: email filing, minutes, field reports, RFI and submittal logs; AI agent answers questions grounded in your own project documents; Strong security posture: SOC 2 Type II, SAML 2.0 SSO, MFA, encryption, and no model training on customer data

**Limitations:** Pricing is quote-based and requires a demo or sales conversation, so costs are not transparent upfront; Value depends on adoption across a whole project team, so partial rollouts may underdeliver; Deepest benefits come from integrations like Procore, Deltek and Unanet, which add setup effort; Feature scope is specialized for AEC workflows, offering less fit for unrelated industries

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cogram.md)

## Glean

Glean addresses a problem most enterprises hit after their first wave of AI adoption: models are powerful but isolated from the context of the business. The platform builds an enterprise context layer by indexing and understanding content across the tools a company already runs on, then uses that grounding to improve both answer quality and efficiency. Because fewer irrelevant tokens need to be sent to a model, the same question costs less to serve.

The product surface spans four areas: enterprise search, an AI assistant for everyday work, an agent platform for automating long-running processes, and Glean Protect for security and governance. Administrators also get model routing and an AI gateway, letting them decide which models handle which requests without rebuilding integrations. Everything inherits the access permissions of the source systems, so answers stay within each employee's existing rights.

Glean serves large organisations across finance, healthcare, retail, technology, and government, with published customers including Booking.com, Zillow, and Ericsson. It holds SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, HIPAA, GDPR, and TX-RAMP Level 2 attestations, and reports 275+ connectors, 40+ supported language models, and 99.9%+ uptime on core services.

**Pricing & Plans:** Contact for pricing. Glean is licensed to organisations based on seats, connectors, and deployment scope, and is evaluated through a demo rather than self-serve purchase.

- **Permission-aware enterprise search:** Ask a question in plain language and get a cited answer assembled from documents, tickets, wikis, and messages across every connected system, with permissions respected.
- **Agent builder and orchestration:** Reusable agents handle multi-step workflows such as onboarding, account research, or incident follow-up by orchestrating actions across business apps.
- **Model routing and AI gateway:** Glean automatically picks and routes requests to the right model and reasoning level, giving teams access to 40+ LLMs through a single governed gateway.
- **Grounded content and analysis:** Draft on-brand documents, summarise meetings, analyse data, and create content grounded in company context rather than generic model knowledge.
- **Governance and observability:** Administrators get usage controls, spend visibility, audit logging, and compliance-ready governance for every AI interaction.

**Strengths:** Answers cite source systems and inherit their permissions, which removes the main blocker to enterprise-wide rollout; One platform covers search, assistant, and agents instead of three separate vendors; Model routing and token efficiency directly reduce the cost per AI query at scale; 275+ pre-built connectors shorten integration work considerably

**Limitations:** Enterprise pricing is quote-based, so budget planning requires a sales conversation; Full value depends on connecting many internal data sources, which takes IT effort; Smallest teams may find the platform more than they need

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/glean.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Cogram and Glean compare in monthly traffic?

Cogram has 4,376 monthly visits, while Glean has 3,301,875. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Cogram has a month-over-month growth rate of -22.3%; Glean has +0.1%.

### How does pricing compare?

Cogram: Contact for Pricing. Cogram uses contact/tailored pricing: a free 14-day self-serve trial and free guided trials are available, external collaborator accounts are free, and full pricing is provided after a demo. Glean: Contact for Pricing. Contact for pricing. Glean is licensed to organisations based on seats, connectors, and deployment scope, and is evaluated through a demo rather than self-serve purchase.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Notion](https://openaitools.app/tool/t) | 173,441,670 | +0.1% | Freemium | The AI workspace where teams and agents get work done together | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/t.md) |
| 2 | [Dooray!](https://openaitools.app/tool/dooray) | 1,532,922 | -3.9% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | All-in-one Korean collaboration suite for teams and public institutions | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/dooray.md) |
| 3 | [Jump](https://openaitools.app/tool/jump-ai) | 553,230 | +33.1% | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Compliant AI assistant for financial advisors | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jump-ai.md) |
| 4 | [Dust](https://openaitools.app/tool/dust) | 547,217 | +1.8% | Contact for Pricing | Builds collaborative enterprise AI agents connected to company knowledge, but offers less robust out-of-the-box universal search. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/dust.md) |
| 5 | [Motion](https://openaitools.app/tool/usemotion-com) | 511,886 | -15.5% | Free Trial, Paid | The AI super app for work — tasks, projects, calendar and meetings in one place | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/usemotion-com.md) |
| 6 | [Gumloop](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop) | 379,557 | -21.1% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Build, share, and control AI agents that actually do the work | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gumloop.md) |
| 7 | [Moveworks](https://openaitools.app/tool/moveworks) | 168,527 | -4.3% | Contact for Pricing | Automates employee IT and HR support requests exceptionally well, but focuses less on general universal document search. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/moveworks.md) |
| 8 | [Kore.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/kore-ai) | 143,328 | -18.2% | Contact for Pricing | Deploys enterprise conversational assistants and automated workflows, but lacks Glean's unified organization-wide knowledge graph search. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kore-ai.md) |
| 9 | [Coworker AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/coworker-ai) | 129,346 | -1.8% | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Creates permission-aware context graphs and routes tasks across enterprise tools, but has a smaller connector library than Glean. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/coworker-ai.md) |
| 10 | [Sana](https://openaitools.app/tool/sana-labs) | 109,714 | -25.5% | Paid, Contact for Pricing | Combines enterprise search, AI agents, and corporate learning, but is less specialized for pure universal workplace search than Glean. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/sana-labs.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/cogram-vs-glean

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)