Cogram records 4,376 monthly visits with -22.3% month-over-month growth and Contact for Pricing pricing. Orca records 1,025,891 monthly visits with +1% growth and Free, Open Source, Enterprise on request pricing.
AI-native project tools for architects and engineers
Project AI Agent
Ask natural-language questions across project documents, contracts and correspondence, and get answers grounded in your own files rather than generic responses.
Email Management
Automatically file, organize and search email across all project correspondence so nothing gets lost in personal inboxes.
Automated Meeting Minutes
Capture minutes in virtual and in-person meetings and have them drafted directly into your firm's templates.
RFIs & Submittals
Log and review RFIs and submittals in a fast, user-friendly workflow that syncs with Procore and other project platforms.
Strengths & Pros
+Purpose-built for architecture, engineering and construction rather than generic project management
+Automates high-friction AEC paperwork: email filing, minutes, field reports, RFI and submittal logs
+AI agent answers questions grounded in your own project documents
+Strong security posture: SOC 2 Type II, SAML 2.0 SSO, MFA, encryption, and no model training on customer data
Frequently Asked Questions: Cogram vs Orca
Cogram has 4,376 monthly visits, while Orca has 1,025,891. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.
Deep integrations with Procore, Autodesk, Deltek, Unanet, Teams, Outlook, Zoom and Google Meet
+Free 14-day self-serve trial and free external collaborator accounts
Limitations
–Pricing is quote-based and requires a demo or sales conversation, so costs are not transparent upfront
–Value depends on adoption across a whole project team, so partial rollouts may underdeliver
–Deepest benefits come from integrations like Procore, Deltek and Unanet, which add setup effort
–Feature scope is specialized for AEC workflows, offering less fit for unrelated industries
Orca
Run many coding agents in parallel, each in its own worktree
Parallel worktrees
Each agent gets its own isolated Git worktree, so multiple agents can edit, test and build concurrently without conflicts.
Bring your own agent CLI
Works with Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor CLI, OpenCode, Copilot, Cline and many other command-line agents using subscriptions you already have.
Integrated browser and design mode
A built-in browser lets you click any element to copy its HTML, styles and selector, or screenshot a page and drop that context straight into an agent prompt.
Terminal, diffs and split panes
Review AI output, run commands and arrange terminals, browsers, files and diffs in panes shaped to the task at hand.
Strengths & Pros
+Free and open source, with no licence cost for the core product
+Genuinely parallel workflow thanks to per-task Git worktrees
+Vendor-neutral: works with many agent CLIs instead of locking you to one
+Cross-platform with iOS and Android companion apps and an extensible plugin system
Limitations
–Not a traditional IDE, so developers wanting a full editor experience may need a second tool
–Newer product with fast-moving releases, which can mean occasional rough edges
–Enterprise pricing is only available on request, so costs are not transparent up front
