# CometAPI vs Received AI

CometAPI records 602,966 monthly visits with +49.7% month-over-month growth and Pay-as-you-go (credits) pricing. Received AI records 0 monthly visits with -100% growth and Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [CometAPI](https://openaitools.app/tool/cometapi) | [Received AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/received) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.cometapi.com | https://received.ai |
| Categories | AI Developer Tools, AI API | AI Accounting, AI For Finance, AI Contract Management, AI Productivity Tools |
| Pricing Model | Pay-as-you-go (credits) | Paid, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 602,966 | 0 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +49.7% | -100% |
| Primary Market | India | Global |
| Direct Visits | 89,151 | 0 |
| Review Score | 4 | 4.1 |
| Saved Count | 2 | 1 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## CometAPI

CometAPI is an aggregation layer for large language and multimodal model providers. Instead of maintaining separate accounts, keys and billing relationships with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and a growing set of image, audio and video vendors, teams sign up once, get a single API key, and call any of 500+ models through an OpenAI-compatible base URL. Existing SDK code usually works after changing the base URL and model name, which keeps migration effort low.

The commercial pitch is straightforward: pay-as-you-go credits, line-item pricing for every model, and rates set below official vendor pricing, with the platform advertising ongoing savings of roughly 20 to 40 percent. There is no monthly subscription or minimum spend, unused credits carry forward, and the model catalog is searchable with side-by-side pricing and capability comparisons. Because model names are the only thing that changes when you switch vendors, teams gain portability if a provider raises prices or has an outage.

Operationally, CometAPI positions itself as production infrastructure rather than a demo playground. It advertises 99.9% service availability and average latency under 400 ms, exposes an API status page and benchmarks, and offers a dashboard for spend, latency and call volume with budget alerts. Enterprise-oriented features include centralized accounts for multiple teams, per-team budgets, encrypted transit and a stated policy that customer data is not used to train models. Integrations with coding agents, low-code automation platforms and app builders let teams plug the gateway into existing workflows rather than rebuilding them.

**Pricing & Plans:** Pay-as-you-go API credits with no monthly subscription, minimum spend or credit card required at signup. CometAPI advertises per-model rates below official vendor pricing, typically 20-40% cheaper, and test credits are included when you create an account.

- **One key for 500+ models:** Replace separate OpenAI, Anthropic and Google credentials with a single key and switch models by changing one line of code.
- **OpenAI-compatible endpoint:** Route text, reasoning, coding, image, audio and video workloads through one OpenAI-compatible base URL without rewriting your app.
- **Transparent pricing and savings:** Line-item pricing per model with discounts below official vendor rates, pay-as-you-go with no monthly subscription or minimum spend.
- **Usage analytics and cost control:** A real-time dashboard tracks spend, latency and call volume so you can set budget alerts and compare models side by side.
- **Prebuilt tool integrations:** Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cline, Dify, n8n, Zapier, Coze and other agent, automation and app-building tools.

**Strengths:** One credential and one endpoint for 500+ models from many providers; OpenAI-compatible format means existing code keeps working with minimal changes; Pay-as-you-go credits with no monthly fee and unused balance carried forward; Dashboard for spend, latency and call volume with budget alerts

**Limitations:** You depend on a third-party intermediary for uptime and latency on every routed model; Some catalog entries are marked coming soon, so not every listed model is instantly available; Pricing and availability can shift as upstream vendors change their own rates

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cometapi.md)

## Received AI

Received targets B2B finance and FinOps teams that have outgrown spreadsheets. Instead of stitching together CSV exports, engineering tickets, and manual reconciliation, teams configure pricing models and contract terms directly in the platform and let it generate invoices, track usage, and reconcile payments. It supports self-serve subscriptions embedded into a company's own website, sales-led enterprise contracts with multi-year terms and milestones, and partner billing for referrals and resellers.

A core differentiator is its "spreadsheet-in-a-system" pricing configuration, which lets finance staff build and adjust any pricing model — subscriptions, usage, services, or hybrid — without engineering support. Received also handles revenue recognition beyond standard subscriptions, including usage, milestones, and price allocation for ASC 606 and IFRS 15 compliance, alongside real-time analytics covering every level of financial operations.

Integration is a major selling point: Received connects to ERP, CRM, PSP, and tax systems, and notably supercharges Stripe-based payment flows. Pricing is stage-based rather than volume-taxed, with the vendor emphasizing that it does not take a cut of customer revenue. A Start-Up tier ($250/mo) has eligibility limits (max 20 employees, max $500K ARR, under $5M raised, one year only), while Lite starts at $490/mo and higher tiers add usage automation, NetSuite/Salesforce integrations, B2B revenue recognition, and channel partner management.

**Pricing & Plans:** Paid, contact for pricing. Self-serve pricing tiers: Start-Up from $250/mo (qualification limits apply), Lite from $490/mo, with Plus and Received All tiers available via sales. Pricing is based on company stage and needs, with no revenue tax or volume commitments.

- **Contract-based billing automation:** Automate invoicing for bespoke multi-year enterprise contracts with varied products and pricing models, replacing manual spreadsheet processing.
- **Self-serve subscription charging:** Embed Received into your own website to manage self-led customers and auto-charge self-serve contracts without engineering work.
- **Channel partner management:** Handle referral and reseller billing, automate partner fees and sales commissions, and monitor partner activity and top-line contributions.
- **ASC 606 and IFRS 15 revenue recognition:** Go beyond subscription RevRec with support for usage, milestones, and price allocation across complex contracts.
- **Usage billing and integrations:** Track product usage in real time via CSV, API, or manual entry, and connect to ERP, CRM, PSP, and tax systems including NetSuite, Salesforce, QuickBooks, Xero, and Stripe.

**Strengths:** Purpose-built for B2B complexity rather than adapted from consumer subscription billing; Finance users can build and change pricing models without engineering support; Covers the full revenue lifecycle: pricing, invoicing, payments, reconciliation, and RevRec; Strong integration coverage across ERP, CRM, PSP, and tax tooling, with deep Stripe support

**Limitations:** No transparent self-serve checkout; several tiers require contacting sales; Entry-level Start-Up tier has strict eligibility limits and is capped at one year; Implementation and migration effort may be significant for teams moving off spreadsheets

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/received.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do CometAPI and Received AI compare in monthly traffic?

CometAPI has 602,966 monthly visits, while Received AI has 0. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

CometAPI has a month-over-month growth rate of +49.7%; Received AI has -100%.

### How does pricing compare?

CometAPI: Pay-as-you-go (credits). Pay-as-you-go API credits with no monthly subscription, minimum spend or credit card required at signup. CometAPI advertises per-model rates below official vendor pricing, typically 20-40% cheaper, and test credits are included when you create an account. Received AI: Paid, Contact for Pricing. Paid, contact for pricing. Self-serve pricing tiers: Start-Up from $250/mo (qualification limits apply), Lite from $490/mo, with Plus and Received All tiers available via sales. Pricing is based on company stage and needs, with no revenue tax or volume commitments.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Google AI Studio](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-ai-studio) | 112,620,020 | +2% | Freemium | Google's rapid prototyping IDE and developer API workbench for building multimodal applications with Gemini models. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-ai-studio.md) |
| 2 | [OpenRouter](https://openaitools.app/tool/openrouter-ai) | 19,941,437 | -6.2% | Paid | Industry-leading model router with transparent pricing and broad provider support, but lacks Comet's specific bundled discounts. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/openrouter-ai.md) |
| 3 | [fal.ai](https://openaitools.app/tool/fal-ai) | 3,093,684 | -3.7% | Paid, pay-as-you-go usage-based pricing | Excels at serverless generation of media models like images and video, but is less focused on general LLM routing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/fal-ai.md) |
| 4 | [Together AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/together-ai) | 1,645,930 | +64.9% | Freemium, Paid | Specializes in high-performance serverless inference for open-source models, but offers fewer proprietary commercial model options. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/together-ai.md) |
| 5 | [Atlas Cloud](https://openaitools.app/tool/atlas-cloud) | 777,031 | -16.4% | Paid | Offers unified access to multimodal language and media models, but focuses more heavily on generation infrastructure. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/atlas-cloud.md) |
| 6 | [LiteLLM](https://openaitools.app/tool/litellm) | 576,967 | +7.9% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Open-source proxy and SDK that standardizes multi-provider LLM calls, but requires self-hosting or manual infrastructure setup. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/litellm.md) |
| 7 | [EvoLink AI Model API](https://openaitools.app/tool/evolink-ai-model-api) | 312,573 | -27% | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | One API for LLM, image, video, and audio models in production | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/evolink-ai-model-api.md) |
| 8 | [SiliconFlow](https://openaitools.app/tool/siliconflow) | 276,303 | -10.5% | Pay-as-you-go | Provides optimized inference for open-weight models behind a unified API, though with different regional pricing structures. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/siliconflow.md) |
| 9 | [AiHubMix](https://openaitools.app/tool/aihubmix) | 238,455 | -16.1% | Contact for Pricing | Provides a similar OpenAI-compatible multi-model gateway with automatic failover, though with a different model lineup. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/aihubmix.md) |
| 10 | [AI/ML API](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-ml-api) | 232,946 | -20.1% | Pay-as-you-go credits (free to start); enterprise custom pricing on request | Aggregates hundreds of foundation models and agent tools into a single endpoint, but has different rate limits. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ai-ml-api.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/cometapi-vs-received

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)