# Composio vs Rivet.dev

Composio records 2,782,603 monthly visits with +22.8% month-over-month growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing. Rivet.dev records 21,359 monthly visits with -44.3% growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Composio](https://openaitools.app/tool/composio) | [Rivet.dev](https://openaitools.app/tool/rivet-dev) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://composio.dev | https://rivet.dev |
| Categories | AI Developer Tools, AI Agent, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI API | AI Agent, AI Workflow, AI Developer Tools, AI App Builder |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Freemium, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 2,782,603 | 21,359 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +22.8% | -44.3% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 1,238,943 | 10,710 |
| Review Score | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Saved Count | 1 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Composio

Composio sits between your AI application and the outside world. Instead of hand-coding an integration for every SaaS product your agent needs, you pick from a large catalog of pre-built toolkits, and Composio handles the tedious parts: OAuth authorization, credential storage and refresh, per-action permission scopes, and execution. The same catalog powers both agent frameworks (via SDKs and function calling) and MCP-compatible clients such as Claude, ChatGPT, Codex, and Cursor, which can connect through a single managed MCP endpoint.

The platform has expanded well beyond simple tool calling. Triggers let agents start background work in response to events in connected apps. Firewall inspects tool results and blocks hidden prompt-injection instructions before the model reads them. Instant tools provide audio, video, search, browser, and data capabilities without managing your own API keys, and optimization features aim to lower the cost per completed task. Enterprise controls add SSO, governance, and audit trail support.

The product is aimed primarily at engineering teams building agents or agentic backends, and secondarily at knowledge workers who want Claude or ChatGPT to operate their everyday apps. It follows a freemium model with a free developer tier and paid tiers plus custom enterprise agreements, and the company states SOC 2 Type II compliance.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free developer tier is available for getting started, with paid plans and custom enterprise pricing for higher usage, team controls, and security requirements. Exact tier limits are published on Composio's pricing page; contact sales for enterprise terms.

- **1,700+ app toolkits:** A large catalog of pre-built integrations spanning productivity, CRM, support, engineering, finance, HR, and e-commerce apps, each exposing callable actions to your agent.
- **Managed authentication:** Composio runs OAuth flows, stores and refreshes credentials, and enforces per-action permission scopes so agents act only where you allow them.
- **MCP gateway:** One managed MCP endpoint that connects Claude, ChatGPT, Codex, Cursor, and other MCP clients to your entire tool catalog in a few clicks.
- **Triggers:** Start background agents from events occurring across connected apps, so work can begin without a user prompt.
- **Firewall and enterprise governance:** Inspect tool outputs to block injected instructions, and add SSO, audit trails, and org-wide policy controls for regulated deployments.

**Strengths:** Very large integration catalog, which removes most custom API glue work; Handles the hard parts of auth: OAuth, token refresh, and scoping; Works with both code-first SDK flows and no-code MCP clients; Safety features such as Firewall and enterprise governance are uncommon in this category

**Limitations:** Deeper capability comes with a learning curve around toolkits, actions, and auth configs; Free tier limits are modest, so production use generally requires a paid plan; Behaviors and available toolkits change frequently, so docs must be checked often

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/composio.md)

## Rivet.dev

At its core Rivet replaces the container per agent with an in-process primitive. An Actor runs inside your existing Node.js or Bun backend rather than in its own container or VM, which is why Rivet reports cold starts measured in single-digit milliseconds and a footprint of tens of kilobytes per Actor instead of hundreds of megabytes. Each Actor carries a SQLite database for memory, can access a filesystem and shell, sleeps when idle, and wakes with its durable state ready for the next request.

The platform handles the operational pieces teams usually build themselves: fault tolerance that reschedules Actors when a node goes down, multi-region placement that routes requests to wherever an Actor currently lives, end-to-end type safety where Actor definitions generate client types, and scheduling via cron or self-set timestamps. Storage is pulled apart into two tiers — a fast SSD for instant writes and object storage that settles writes at a fraction of the cost — so running many small databases stays affordable.

Rivet positions itself as infrastructure for the "agentic era" and can be deployed as a managed cloud, inside your own VPC through a bring-your-own-cloud model, or fully self-hosted down to air-gapped networks. It is open source under Apache 2.0, backed by Y Combinator and a16z Speedrun, and integrates with popular coding agents and frameworks.

**Pricing & Plans:** Rivet Cloud uses a plan-plus-nodes model. The control plane is Free ($0) for prototyping, Hobby at $10/month, Team at $120/month, and Enterprise at $900/month, each raising control-plane redundancy, Actor Node caps, and support. Actor Nodes are billed per month on top, from $4.20 (R-5) to $94.50 (R-160). Self-hosting is free and open source under Apache 2.0, and startups from Y Combinator or a16z Speedrun get 50% off the Team plan for 12 months.

- **Durable actors with persistent state:** Every Actor gets a SQLite database and a filesystem, so an agent's memory and progress survive restarts and idle periods without a separate database.
- **Lightweight secure sandboxing:** Run untrusted or AI-generated code on your own infrastructure with fine-grained control over network access, filesystem permissions, and resource limits.
- **Fault tolerance and workflows:** A node failure reschedules its Actors elsewhere with state intact, and multi-step work replays after a crash — with no checkpointing harness to build yourself.
- **Realtime and multiplayer:** Address an Actor directly over HTTP or hold a live WebSocket, and use the React SDK to subscribe components to an Actor's state in real time.
- **One-binary deployment and observability:** Ship with a single stateless Rust binary, embeds storage in S3-compatible buckets, and emits OpenTelemetry traces, metrics, and logs to your existing collector.

**Strengths:** Four-digit millisecond cold starts and a very small per-Actor memory footprint let a single server host far more agents; Open source (Apache 2.0) with a single Rust binary, so it can be self-hosted, run in a VPC, or air-gapped; Durable state via per-Actor SQLite plus object-storage-backed tiers keeps agents restart-safe and cheap; Strong developer ergonomics: typed SDKs, a React SDK, WebSocket networking, and OpenTelemetry baked in

**Limitations:** Requires Node.js or Bun and a working Rust-based control plane deployment for self-hosting, so it favors backend engineers over no-code users; Advanced durability and sandboxing concepts (Actors, WarpDrive storage) carry a learning curve; Managed cloud cost scales with Actor Nodes, which can climb for many mid-sized/sized nodes; Enterprise features like multi-tenancy and hardened compliance guidance sit behind sales conversations

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/rivet-dev.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Composio and Rivet.dev compare in monthly traffic?

Composio has 2,782,603 monthly visits, while Rivet.dev has 21,359. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Composio has a month-over-month growth rate of +22.8%; Rivet.dev has -44.3%.

### How does pricing compare?

Composio: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Freemium. A free developer tier is available for getting started, with paid plans and custom enterprise pricing for higher usage, team controls, and security requirements. Exact tier limits are published on Composio's pricing page; contact sales for enterprise terms. Rivet.dev: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Rivet Cloud uses a plan-plus-nodes model. The control plane is Free ($0) for prototyping, Hobby at $10/month, Team at $120/month, and Enterprise at $900/month, each raising control-plane redundancy, Actor Node caps, and support. Actor Nodes are billed per month on top, from $4.20 (R-5) to $94.50 (R-160). Self-hosting is free and open source under Apache 2.0, and startups from Y Combinator or a16z Speedrun get 50% off the Team plan for 12 months.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [OpenRouter](https://openaitools.app/tool/openrouter-ai) | 19,941,437 | -6.2% | Paid | Leading unified LLM model gateway, but strictly handles model inference rather than third-party SaaS tool integrations and authentication. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/openrouter-ai.md) |
| 2 | [LiteLLM](https://openaitools.app/tool/litellm) | 576,967 | +7.9% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Exceptional open-source gateway for LLM provider routing, but lacks Composio's extensive library of SaaS tool integrations and auth. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/litellm.md) |
| 3 | [Treg](https://openaitools.app/tool/treg) | 452,935 | +223.4% | Freemium | Open-source MCP gateway and pay-per-call catalog, but offers less extensive managed authentication workflows than Composio. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/treg.md) |
| 4 | [Mastra](https://openaitools.app/tool/mastra) | 318,954 | -5% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The TypeScript framework for building, deploying, and observing AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/mastra.md) |
| 5 | [Merge](https://openaitools.app/tool/merge-dev) | 313,201 | +1.7% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Powerful universal API infrastructure for connecting agents to B2B data, but focuses more on unified SaaS data than tool execution. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/merge-dev.md) |
| 6 | [Pipedream](https://openaitools.app/tool/pipedream) | 312,216 | -14.3% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Excellent managed authentication and event triggers for agent workflows, but less specialized around native MCP gateway protocols. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/pipedream.md) |
| 7 | [Portkey](https://openaitools.app/tool/portkey-ai) | 195,650 | -9.4% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Comprehensive enterprise LLM gateway and guardrails, but focuses more on model routing than third-party SaaS tool execution. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/portkey-ai.md) |
| 8 | [Agent 37](https://openaitools.app/tool/agent-37) | 180,030 | +24.2% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | The low-cost cloud sandbox where AI agents actually live | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/agent-37.md) |
| 9 | [Coder](https://openaitools.app/tool/coder) | 149,417 | -12.8% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing, Free | Self-hosted cloud development environments and AI coding agents for enterprise teams | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/coder.md) |
| 10 | [Agno](https://openaitools.app/tool/agno) | 140,302 | -3.3% | Contact for Pricing, Free | Flexible Python agent framework with built-in tools, but less focused on acting as a standalone universal integration middleware. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/agno.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/composio-vs-rivet-dev

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)