# Consensus vs Dilog Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Dilog records 341 monthly visits with 0% growth and Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing. | Metric | [Consensus](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus) | [Dilog](https://openaitools.app/tool/dilog) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Website URL | https://consensus.app | https://dilog.ai | | Categories | AI Search Engine, AI Research Tool, AI Papers, AI Article Summarizer | AI Research Tool, AI Marketing, AI Predictions | | Pricing Model | Freemium | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | | Monthly Visits | 6,014,388 | 341 | | MoM Growth Rate | -1.2% | 0% | | Primary Market | United States | India | | Direct Visits | 2,918,713 | 122 | | Review Score | 4.7 | 4.1 | | Saved Count | 31 | 0 | | Supported Platforms | Website | Website | ## Consensus Consensus works like a scholarly search engine supercharged by AI. Instead of returning a flat list of PDFs, you ask a natural-language research question and Consensus extracts claims from relevant papers, then shows you what the studies actually find. A Consensus Meter summarizes the weight of evidence for yes/no questions, so you can see at a glance whether scientists largely agree, disagree, or remain divided. The platform indexes hundreds of millions of peer-reviewed papers spanning medicine, biology, psychology, economics and more. Answers link straight back to the source studies, and you can filter by study design, journal quality, sample size and publication year to separate stronger evidence from weaker signals. Features like Deep Search, Topic Synthesis and Skills let researchers build a working knowledge base over time rather than starting from scratch on every query. Consensus is designed for researchers, clinicians, students and analysts who need trustworthy signals from the scientific record without drowning in irrelevant results. A free tier gives limited AI-powered searches each month, while paid plans unlock unlimited use, advanced filters and deeper synthesis. **Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options. - **Evidence-grounded answers:** Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper. - **Consensus Meter:** A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence. - **Powerful filters:** Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence. - **Topic synthesis and Deep Search:** Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are. - **Research workspace:** Save papers, organize sources and build a persistent knowledge base for literature reviews and ongoing projects. **Strengths:** Answers cite real peer-reviewed papers, so claims are verifiable; Consensus Meter makes it easy to gauge scientific agreement at a glance; Rich filters help separate high-quality evidence from weaker studies; Fast, clean interface designed around research workflows **Limitations:** Free tier caps the number of AI-assisted searches per month; Coverage is strongest for STEM and health fields, lighter for some humanities topics; It guides you toward sources but is not a substitute for reading full papers [Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus.md) ## Dilog Dilog 是一个客户模拟平台，而且它从真人开始。它不做样本问卷，而是与你的真实客户进行 2～3 小时的深度访谈，再把这些对话转化为它所说的「匿名反思画像」（ARP）——按照这些具体个人的思维方式、情感反应与决策逻辑构建的数字版本。结果就是一个你的整个团队随时可以提问的私密面板，用来测试文案、营销活动、设计方案与产品创意，几分钟就能拿到答案，而不是等上几周。 针对「为什么不直接用通用大模型提问」，Dilog 的核心论点是保真度。原始 LLM 会回归统计均值：它是所有人的平均，因而不代表任何具体的人。Dilog 的画像是从数百小时的长访谈中构建的，因而保留了深度、矛盾、非理性的品牌忠诚，以及只有在对话中才会暴露的意外底线。Dilog 公布与真人直接回答的匹配度约为 86%，并每季度与面板背后的真人重新校准，因此这项资产会不断复利累积，而不像一次性研究那样到期失效。 价格覆盖个人到企业。个人方案为每月 50 澳元约 7 次对话（350 积分），Researcher 75 澳元，Pro 125 澳元；另有从 12 澳元起含 24 积分的按量付费选项，并提供 14 天免费试用。组织方案包含基于你自己客户访谈定制的面板——构建周期 6～12 周、单独议价——起步为 Team 每月 1,000 澳元（不含 GST）、Growth 3,000 澳元、Enterprise 5,000 澳元，均含不限人数团队成员与滚动三个月积分余额。 **Pricing & Plans:** 提供免费试用，并有订阅与按量付费两种模式。个人方案：Starter 每月 50 澳元（350 积分，约 7 次对话）、Researcher 75 澳元、Pro 125 澳元。按量付费 12 澳元起含 24 积分。组织方案起步为每月 1,000 澳元（不含 GST，Team，15,000 积分）、Growth 3,000 澳元、Enterprise 5,000 澳元，定制面板的搭建费用单独议价。 - **基于访谈的画像:** 面板由与真实客户的 2～3 小时访谈构建而成，因此每个回答都能追溯到真人的原话，而非统计平均值。 - **7×24 随取随用的洞察:** 可以在早上 9 点开董事会前、前一晚 11 点提问。无需等待招募、排期或激励发放。 - **给出决策动因，而非只有答案:** 不仅看到客户选哪个，还能看到背后的动机、犹豫与决策触发点。 - **季度重新校准:** 每季度都会重新访谈面板背后的真人，画像因此持续演化，而不像一次性研究那样过期作废。 - **默认隐私与安全:** 默认匿名化，交互仅限本组织可见，提交的问题永不用于训练模型。 **Strengths:** 回答可追溯到真实访谈证据，而不是合成推测; 彻底省去招募与排期环节，决策前一夜也能提问; 能捕捉选择背后的原因，包括非理性忠诚与意外底线; 面板每季度重新访谈而持续改进，而非一次性研究后失效 **Limitations:** 组织级面板需要 6～12 周的构建周期才能上线; 价格以澳元计价，定位偏向常年做调研的团队; 个人通用面板的语境针对性弱于企业定制面板 [Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/dilog.md) ## Frequently Asked Questions ### How do Consensus and Dilog compare in monthly traffic? Consensus has 6,014,388 monthly visits, while Dilog has 341. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality. ### How do their growth rates compare? Consensus has a month-over-month growth rate of -1.2%; Dilog has 0%. ### How does pricing compare? Consensus: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options. Dilog: Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing. 提供免费试用，并有订阅与按量付费两种模式。个人方案：Starter 每月 50 澳元（350 积分，约 7 次对话）、Researcher 75 澳元、Pro 125 澳元。按量付费 12 澳元起含 24 积分。组织方案起步为每月 1,000 澳元（不含 GST，Team，15,000 积分）、Growth 3,000 澳元、Enterprise 5,000 澳元，定制面板的搭建费用单独议价。 ## Alternatives | # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | 1 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Covers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) | | 2 | [Semantic Scholar](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar) | 8,198,672 | +5.8% | Free | Completely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar.md) | | 3 | [Kagi Search](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search) | 4,647,605 | +3.2% | Free Trial, Paid | A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search.md) | | 4 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) | | 5 | [Branded](https://openaitools.app/tool/gobranded-com) | 3,704,728 | +6.6% | Contact for Pricing | Targeted research audiences with AI-verified data quality | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/gobranded-com.md) | | 6 | [Elicit](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit) | 1,751,507 | +3.1% | Freemium | Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit.md) | | 7 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) | | 8 | [Listen Labs](https://openaitools.app/tool/listen-labs) | 1,254,632 | +22.1% | Contact for Pricing | AI-moderated customer interviews that turn conversations into decisions | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/listen-labs.md) | | 9 | [Rayyan](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan) | 1,116,437 | +7.9% | Freemium | AI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan.md) | | 10 | [Scite](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite) | 841,974 | +1.1% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite.md) | --- Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/consensus-vs-dilog More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)