# Consensus vs Docalysis

Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Docalysis records 5,543 monthly visits with +16.8% growth and Freemium, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Consensus](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus) | [Docalysis](https://openaitools.app/tool/docalysis) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://consensus.app | https://docalysis.com |
| Categories | AI Search Engine, AI Research Tool, AI Papers, AI Article Summarizer | AI Chatbot, AI PDF, AI Answer, AI Reader |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 6,014,388 | 5,543 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -1.2% | +16.8% |
| Primary Market | United States | Brazil |
| Direct Visits | 2,918,713 | 2,267 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 31 | 5 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Consensus

Consensus works like a scholarly search engine supercharged by AI. Instead of returning a flat list of PDFs, you ask a natural-language research question and Consensus extracts claims from relevant papers, then shows you what the studies actually find. A Consensus Meter summarizes the weight of evidence for yes/no questions, so you can see at a glance whether scientists largely agree, disagree, or remain divided.

The platform indexes hundreds of millions of peer-reviewed papers spanning medicine, biology, psychology, economics and more. Answers link straight back to the source studies, and you can filter by study design, journal quality, sample size and publication year to separate stronger evidence from weaker signals. Features like Deep Search, Topic Synthesis and Skills let researchers build a working knowledge base over time rather than starting from scratch on every query.

Consensus is designed for researchers, clinicians, students and analysts who need trustworthy signals from the scientific record without drowning in irrelevant results. A free tier gives limited AI-powered searches each month, while paid plans unlock unlimited use, advanced filters and deeper synthesis.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

- **Evidence-grounded answers:** Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
- **Consensus Meter:** A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
- **Powerful filters:** Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
- **Topic synthesis and Deep Search:** Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
- **Research workspace:** Save papers, organize sources and build a persistent knowledge base for literature reviews and ongoing projects.

**Strengths:** Answers cite real peer-reviewed papers, so claims are verifiable; Consensus Meter makes it easy to gauge scientific agreement at a glance; Rich filters help separate high-quality evidence from weaker studies; Fast, clean interface designed around research workflows

**Limitations:** Free tier caps the number of AI-assisted searches per month; Coverage is strongest for STEM and health fields, lighter for some humanities topics; It guides you toward sources but is not a substitute for reading full papers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus.md)

## Docalysis

Docalysis turns any PDF into a conversational knowledge source. After you upload a document, you can ask questions the way you would to a colleague and get answers generated from the file contents, with the matching passages surfaced so you can verify the result. It works well for research papers, contracts, reports, manuals, and any long text you would rather query than read cover to cover.

The product supports multi-file chat, so you can ask questions across a set of related documents rather than one at a time. Beyond the standard chat experience, Docalysis offers a batch mode and an Embed/API option for teams that want to integrate PDF question answering into their own products or internal tools. Files can be deleted at any time, and the company states that uploaded documents are handled securely.

Pricing is credit-based. A free tier covers small files and a limited number of pages and questions each month, while paid plans raise file size, page upload, and question limits, and the Business tier adds team administration and custom limits.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with credit-based tiers. Free: 5 MB file size limit, 600 pages uploaded per month, 150 pages per file, 50 questions per month. Plus: about $14/mo, 20 MB files, 3,000 pages/month, 600 pages per file, 500 questions/month. Ultimate: about $35/mo, 50 MB files, 8,000 pages/month, 1,800 pages per file, 1,500 questions/month. Business: custom pricing with team administration and phone support. One chat message uses one credit; bonus credits can be purchased after monthly limits are exhausted.

- **Chat with your PDFs:** Upload one or many PDFs and ask questions in natural language. The AI answers from the document contents instead of generic knowledge.
- **Multi-file chat:** Ask questions across several related documents at once, useful for comparing reports, contracts, or research sources.
- **Source-referenced answers:** Responses draw directly on your files, so you can trace where an answer came from and check it against the original text.
- **Batch and Embed API:** Process documents at scale with batch mode, or integrate PDF question answering into your own app using the Embed and API options.
- **Credit-based plans:** Each chat message costs one credit. Monthly plans refresh on your signup date, and bonus credits are available when you exceed a limit.

**Strengths:** Answers are generated from your own uploaded files rather than the open web; Multi-file chat lets you question a whole set of documents at once; Free tier lets you try the core workflow without paying; Batch and API options suit teams that need scale or integration

**Limitations:** Credit limits mean heavy users may need to buy bonus credits; Free tier caps file size at 5 MB and 50 questions per month; No dedicated mobile app listed; it is a browser-based tool; Very large or image-heavy PDFs may fall outside free and mid-tier limits

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/docalysis.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Consensus and Docalysis compare in monthly traffic?

Consensus has 6,014,388 monthly visits, while Docalysis has 5,543. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Consensus has a month-over-month growth rate of -1.2%; Docalysis has +16.8%.

### How does pricing compare?

Consensus: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options. Docalysis: Freemium, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with credit-based tiers. Free: 5 MB file size limit, 600 pages uploaded per month, 150 pages per file, 50 questions per month. Plus: about $14/mo, 20 MB files, 3,000 pages/month, 600 pages per file, 500 questions/month. Ultimate: about $35/mo, 50 MB files, 8,000 pages/month, 1,800 pages per file, 1,500 questions/month. Business: custom pricing with team administration and phone support. One chat message uses one credit; bonus credits can be purchased after monthly limits are exhausted.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Covers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Semantic Scholar](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar) | 8,198,672 | +5.8% | Free | Completely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar.md) |
| 3 | [Kagi Search](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search) | 4,647,605 | +3.2% | Free Trial, Paid | A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search.md) |
| 4 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | AI research platform for reading, understanding and writing scientific papers | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 5 | [PDFgear](https://openaitools.app/tool/pdfgear) | 2,845,280 | -3.4% | Free | A free, AI-powered PDF editor for every device | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/pdfgear.md) |
| 6 | [Elicit](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit) | 1,751,507 | +3.1% | Freemium | Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit.md) |
| 7 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) |
| 8 | [Rayyan](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan) | 1,116,437 | +7.9% | Freemium | AI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan.md) |
| 9 | [ChatPDF](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatpdf) | 1,044,477 | -3.7% | Freemium | Chat with any PDF, video, or website and get cited answers in seconds | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatpdf.md) |
| 10 | [Scite](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite) | 841,974 | +1.1% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/consensus-vs-docalysis

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)