# Consensus vs ExamEye

Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. ExamEye records 0 monthly visits with — growth and Free pricing.

| Metric | [Consensus](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus) | [ExamEye](https://openaitools.app/tool/exameye) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://consensus.app | https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/exameye/memmdjiigacahjknppchpblbamcgbefb |
| Categories | AI Search Engine, AI Research Tool, AI Papers, AI Article Summarizer | AI Research Tool, AI Monitor, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI For Data Analytics |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 6,014,388 | 0 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -1.2% | — |
| Primary Market | United States | Global |
| Direct Visits | 2,918,713 | 0 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 3.8 |
| Saved Count | 31 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Browser Extension |

## Consensus

Consensus works like a scholarly search engine supercharged by AI. Instead of returning a flat list of PDFs, you ask a natural-language research question and Consensus extracts claims from relevant papers, then shows you what the studies actually find. A Consensus Meter summarizes the weight of evidence for yes/no questions, so you can see at a glance whether scientists largely agree, disagree, or remain divided.

The platform indexes hundreds of millions of peer-reviewed papers spanning medicine, biology, psychology, economics and more. Answers link straight back to the source studies, and you can filter by study design, journal quality, sample size and publication year to separate stronger evidence from weaker signals. Features like Deep Search, Topic Synthesis and Skills let researchers build a working knowledge base over time rather than starting from scratch on every query.

Consensus is designed for researchers, clinicians, students and analysts who need trustworthy signals from the scientific record without drowning in irrelevant results. A free tier gives limited AI-powered searches each month, while paid plans unlock unlimited use, advanced filters and deeper synthesis.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

- **Evidence-grounded answers:** Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
- **Consensus Meter:** A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
- **Powerful filters:** Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
- **Topic synthesis and Deep Search:** Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
- **Research workspace:** Save papers, organize sources and build a persistent knowledge base for literature reviews and ongoing projects.

**Strengths:** Answers cite real peer-reviewed papers, so claims are verifiable; Consensus Meter makes it easy to gauge scientific agreement at a glance; Rich filters help separate high-quality evidence from weaker studies; Fast, clean interface designed around research workflows

**Limitations:** Free tier caps the number of AI-assisted searches per month; Coverage is strongest for STEM and health fields, lighter for some humanities topics; It guides you toward sources but is not a substitute for reading full papers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus.md)

## ExamEye

ExamEye was created as part of a research project at Corvinus University of Budapest. Its purpose is narrow and explicit: to investigate whether students who use ChatGPT during examinations display distinct browsing behaviours compared with students who do not. Rather than being a study aid, the extension is an instrument for gathering behavioural data for academic analysis.

During an examination period the extension records a specific set of signals: how long the user stays focused, how long they remain active, which URLs they open, the text of Google searches they run, and the ChatGPT context content involved in the session. That combination lets researchers correlate AI usage with attention patterns and search activity rather than relying on self-reported answers.

The extension is free, weighs about 213 KiB, requires English and was last updated in November 2023 (version 1.0.2). It has a small user base of roughly 43 people and no public ratings, which is typical for a targeted research tool. Its store disclosure states that it handles web history and website content, and that data is not sold to third parties or used for creditworthiness or lending decisions.

**Pricing & Plans:** Completely free — it is an academic research extension with no paid tiers or in-app purchases.

- **Exam-period activity tracking:** Records user activity only during examination sessions, keeping data collection scoped to the research window.
- **Focus and active interval metrics:** Measures how long the user stays focused and how long they remain actively engaged, producing attention-pattern data.
- **URL and search logging:** Captures the URLs of opened pages and the text of Google searches performed during the test.
- **ChatGPT context recording:** Logs the ChatGPT context content used during the examination to correlate AI usage with behaviour.

**Strengths:** Purpose-built for research, so data collection is narrowly scoped to the examination period.; Free to install and lightweight at roughly 213 KiB.; Published by a university department, giving the project clear institutional context.; Does not sell collected data to third parties or use it for lending or creditworthiness decisions.

**Limitations:** Very small user base and no ratings, so there is little public feedback to rely on.; Has not been updated since November 2023 (version 1.0.2).; Record handling of web history and website content is a significant privacy consideration that participants must consent to.

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/exameye.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Consensus and ExamEye compare in monthly traffic?

Consensus has 6,014,388 monthly visits, while ExamEye has 0. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Consensus has a month-over-month growth rate of -1.2%; ExamEye has —.

### How does pricing compare?

Consensus: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options. ExamEye: Free. Completely free — it is an academic research extension with no paid tiers or in-app purchases.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Covers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Semantic Scholar](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar) | 8,198,672 | +5.8% | Free | Completely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar.md) |
| 3 | [Kagi Search](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search) | 4,647,605 | +3.2% | Free Trial, Paid | A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search.md) |
| 4 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 5 | [Elicit](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit) | 1,751,507 | +3.1% | Freemium | Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit.md) |
| 6 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) |
| 7 | [Merlin AI](https://openaitools.app/tool/merlin-ai) | 1,382,634 | +13.1% | Freemium | One-click AI assistant for browsing, writing and research | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/merlin-ai.md) |
| 8 | [Rayyan](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan) | 1,116,437 | +7.9% | Freemium | AI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan.md) |
| 9 | [Scite](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite) | 841,974 | +1.1% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite.md) |
| 10 | [ResearchRabbit](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit) | 831,571 | +3.1% | Free | Excellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/consensus-vs-exameye

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)