# Consensus vs Fillout

Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Fillout records 3,923,917 monthly visits with -9.7% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Consensus](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus) | [Fillout](https://openaitools.app/tool/fillout-com) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://consensus.app | https://www.fillout.com |
| Categories | AI Search Engine, AI Research Tool, AI Papers, AI Article Summarizer | AI Forms, AI Quiz Generator, AI Signature Generator, AI PDF |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 6,014,388 | 3,923,917 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -1.2% | -9.7% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 2,918,713 | 2,306,833 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 31 | 12 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Consensus

Consensus works like a scholarly search engine supercharged by AI. Instead of returning a flat list of PDFs, you ask a natural-language research question and Consensus extracts claims from relevant papers, then shows you what the studies actually find. A Consensus Meter summarizes the weight of evidence for yes/no questions, so you can see at a glance whether scientists largely agree, disagree, or remain divided.

The platform indexes hundreds of millions of peer-reviewed papers spanning medicine, biology, psychology, economics and more. Answers link straight back to the source studies, and you can filter by study design, journal quality, sample size and publication year to separate stronger evidence from weaker signals. Features like Deep Search, Topic Synthesis and Skills let researchers build a working knowledge base over time rather than starting from scratch on every query.

Consensus is designed for researchers, clinicians, students and analysts who need trustworthy signals from the scientific record without drowning in irrelevant results. A free tier gives limited AI-powered searches each month, while paid plans unlock unlimited use, advanced filters and deeper synthesis.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

- **Evidence-grounded answers:** Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
- **Consensus Meter:** A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
- **Powerful filters:** Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
- **Topic synthesis and Deep Search:** Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
- **Research workspace:** Save papers, organize sources and build a persistent knowledge base for literature reviews and ongoing projects.

**Strengths:** Answers cite real peer-reviewed papers, so claims are verifiable; Consensus Meter makes it easy to gauge scientific agreement at a glance; Rich filters help separate high-quality evidence from weaker studies; Fast, clean interface designed around research workflows

**Limitations:** Free tier caps the number of AI-assisted searches per month; Coverage is strongest for STEM and health fields, lighter for some humanities topics; It guides you toward sources but is not a substitute for reading full papers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus.md)

## Fillout

Fillout is a no-code platform for building forms, surveys, quizzes, and payment or scheduling pages. You can start from a description and let the built-in Zite AI assemble a ready-to-publish form in your brand, or drag and drop fields manually. Every submission is stored in a structured database you can filter, analyze, and connect to other tools.

Beyond basic data collection, Fillout adds intelligent routing, login-based forms that let respondents edit their own answers, digital signatures, and native integrations with 50+ apps. Branding is fully controllable, including custom domains, white-labeling, and embeds as popups, sliders, or full-screen pages.

A large number of organizations use Fillout for secure data intake, and the service advertises SOC II Type 2 compliance plus AES-256 encryption. A free tier covers casual use, while paid plans unlock advanced logic, higher limits, and team features.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free plan covers basic forms and submissions, with paid tiers for advanced logic, higher limits, file uploads, payments, and team collaboration.

- **AI form builder (Zite):** Describe the form you need in plain language and Zite generates a branded form with logic, file uploads, and payments.
- **Logic and workflows:** Add conditional logic, intelligent routing, and multi-step workflows to automate what happens after each response.
- **Editable and secure submissions:** Respondents can log in to update their answers, and forms can be restricted to internal users only.
- **Branding and embeds:** Use custom themes, fonts, logos, custom CSS, your own domain, and embed forms as popups, sliders, or full-screen pages.
- **50+ integrations and analytics:** Send responses to spreadsheets, CRMs, and other tools, then review and collaborate on results with flexible views.

**Strengths:** AI-assisted building makes first drafts fast; Deep logic, workflows, and 50+ integrations; Strong branding controls including white-label and custom domains; SOC II Type 2 compliance and AES-256 encryption

**Limitations:** Advanced features require paid plans; Feature depth can be overwhelming for simple one-off forms; Popular templates see heavy competition for the same look

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/fillout-com.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Consensus and Fillout compare in monthly traffic?

Consensus has 6,014,388 monthly visits, while Fillout has 3,923,917. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Consensus has a month-over-month growth rate of -1.2%; Fillout has -9.7%.

### How does pricing compare?

Consensus: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options. Fillout: Freemium. Freemium. A free plan covers basic forms and submissions, with paid tiers for advanced logic, higher limits, file uploads, payments, and team collaboration.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Covers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Semantic Scholar](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar) | 8,198,672 | +5.8% | Free | Completely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar.md) |
| 3 | [Kagi Search](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search) | 4,647,605 | +3.2% | Free Trial, Paid | A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search.md) |
| 4 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 5 | [Elicit](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit) | 1,751,507 | +3.1% | Freemium | Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit.md) |
| 6 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) |
| 7 | [Rayyan](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan) | 1,116,437 | +7.9% | Freemium | AI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan.md) |
| 8 | [forms.app](https://openaitools.app/tool/forms-app) | 987,157 | -11.2% | Freemium, Paid | Broader template library and multi-channel sharing features, but less flexible multi-page layout customization than Fillout. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/forms-app.md) |
| 9 | [Scite](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite) | 841,974 | +1.1% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite.md) |
| 10 | [ResearchRabbit](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit) | 831,571 | +3.1% | Free | Excellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/consensus-vs-fillout-com

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)