# Consensus vs First Answer

Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. First Answer records 3,482 monthly visits with +18.9% growth and Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Consensus](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus) | [First Answer](https://openaitools.app/tool/first-answer) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://consensus.app | https://firstanswer.ai |
| Categories | AI Search Engine, AI Research Tool, AI Papers, AI Article Summarizer | AI SEO Tools, AI Marketing, AI Search Engine, AI Monitor |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 6,014,388 | 3,482 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -1.2% | +18.9% |
| Primary Market | United States | Brazil |
| Direct Visits | 2,918,713 | 1,441 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.1 |
| Saved Count | 31 | 1 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Consensus

Consensus works like a scholarly search engine supercharged by AI. Instead of returning a flat list of PDFs, you ask a natural-language research question and Consensus extracts claims from relevant papers, then shows you what the studies actually find. A Consensus Meter summarizes the weight of evidence for yes/no questions, so you can see at a glance whether scientists largely agree, disagree, or remain divided.

The platform indexes hundreds of millions of peer-reviewed papers spanning medicine, biology, psychology, economics and more. Answers link straight back to the source studies, and you can filter by study design, journal quality, sample size and publication year to separate stronger evidence from weaker signals. Features like Deep Search, Topic Synthesis and Skills let researchers build a working knowledge base over time rather than starting from scratch on every query.

Consensus is designed for researchers, clinicians, students and analysts who need trustworthy signals from the scientific record without drowning in irrelevant results. A free tier gives limited AI-powered searches each month, while paid plans unlock unlimited use, advanced filters and deeper synthesis.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

- **Evidence-grounded answers:** Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
- **Consensus Meter:** A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
- **Powerful filters:** Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
- **Topic synthesis and Deep Search:** Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
- **Research workspace:** Save papers, organize sources and build a persistent knowledge base for literature reviews and ongoing projects.

**Strengths:** Answers cite real peer-reviewed papers, so claims are verifiable; Consensus Meter makes it easy to gauge scientific agreement at a glance; Rich filters help separate high-quality evidence from weaker studies; Fast, clean interface designed around research workflows

**Limitations:** Free tier caps the number of AI-assisted searches per month; Coverage is strongest for STEM and health fields, lighter for some humanities topics; It guides you toward sources but is not a substitute for reading full papers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus.md)

## First Answer

First Answer is built for a shift that many marketing teams are still catching up with: a growing share of product research now happens inside AI assistants rather than on a search results page. The platform lets you define the prompts that actually matter to your business, then continuously checks how ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Grok, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews answer them. Instead of a single ranking, you get three signals — visibility (how often your brand appears versus competitors), position (where in the answer you are mentioned) and sentiment (how AI characterises you).

Beyond monitoring, First Answer exposes the plumbing of AI answers. A cited-sources view shows which domains, pages and publications the models lean on in your category, which highlights the content gaps worth filling. Crawler and AI traffic logs show which bots visit your site, how often and which pages they actually read, giving a concrete feedback loop between publishing and AI visibility. Competitor tracking lets you compare share of answer side by side with rivals. It also supports MCP and API integrations so you can query your First Answer data from inside the AI tools you already use.

The platform pairs diagnostics with prescriptions: score-based recommendations rank the actions most likely to win space in AI answers, and a content creation workflow turns those recommendations into new articles and pages with reference URLs. A free analysis returns an initial report in about a minute without a card, and a 7-day trial is offered on the paid platform. It is positioned for SEO, content and brand teams that accept AI assistants as a discovery channel they can measure and influence.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with a free brand analysis report, a 7-day free trial of the platform, and paid plans for teams; contact the vendor for enterprise pricing.

- **Prompt-level AI monitoring:** Define the prompts that matter to your business and track how ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Perplexity, Grok and Google AI Overviews answer them over time.
- **Visibility, position and sentiment:** See how often your brand appears versus competitors, where in the answer you are mentioned and how positively AI describes you.
- **Cited sources analysis:** Discover which domains, pages and publications the models reference in your category to find the content gaps worth filling.
- **AI crawler and traffic logs:** Track which AI bots visit your site, how frequently and which pages they read, closing the loop between publishing and AI visibility.
- **Score-based recommendations and content creation:** Get prioritised actions to improve your standing, then generate articles and pages designed to be understood and cited by AI.

**Strengths:** Covers the full loop from monitoring to cited sources to content actions; Covers a broad set of assistants including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, Perplexity and Grok; Free initial analysis gets you a report without a credit card; MCP and API access to query your own data inside other AI tools

**Limitations:** AI answer data is inherently volatile, so trends matter more than single snapshots; Full optimisation workflow requires a paid subscription and sends you into content production

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/first-answer.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Consensus and First Answer compare in monthly traffic?

Consensus has 6,014,388 monthly visits, while First Answer has 3,482. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Consensus has a month-over-month growth rate of -1.2%; First Answer has +18.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Consensus: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options. First Answer: Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing. Freemium with a free brand analysis report, a 7-day free trial of the platform, and paid plans for teams; contact the vendor for enterprise pricing.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Covers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Semantic Scholar](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar) | 8,198,672 | +5.8% | Free | Completely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar.md) |
| 3 | [Kagi Search](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search) | 4,647,605 | +3.2% | Free Trial, Paid | A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search.md) |
| 4 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 5 | [Elicit](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit) | 1,751,507 | +3.1% | Freemium | Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit.md) |
| 6 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) |
| 7 | [Rayyan](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan) | 1,116,437 | +7.9% | Freemium | AI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan.md) |
| 8 | [Scite](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite) | 841,974 | +1.1% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite.md) |
| 9 | [ResearchRabbit](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit) | 831,571 | +3.1% | Free | Excellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit.md) |
| 10 | [Connected Papers](https://openaitools.app/tool/connected-papers) | 750,576 | +3.1% | Freemium | Visualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/connected-papers.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/consensus-vs-first-answer

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)