# Consensus vs Floatz

Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Floatz records 253 monthly visits with -36.8% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Consensus](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus) | [Floatz](https://openaitools.app/tool/floatz-ai) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://consensus.app | https://floatz.ai |
| Categories | AI Search Engine, AI Research Tool, AI Papers, AI Article Summarizer | AI Healthcare, AI Research Tool, AI For Data Analytics, AI Report Generator |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 6,014,388 | 253 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -1.2% | -36.8% |
| Primary Market | United States | Switzerland |
| Direct Visits | 2,918,713 | 94 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 3.8 |
| Saved Count | 31 | 17 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Consensus

Consensus works like a scholarly search engine supercharged by AI. Instead of returning a flat list of PDFs, you ask a natural-language research question and Consensus extracts claims from relevant papers, then shows you what the studies actually find. A Consensus Meter summarizes the weight of evidence for yes/no questions, so you can see at a glance whether scientists largely agree, disagree, or remain divided.

The platform indexes hundreds of millions of peer-reviewed papers spanning medicine, biology, psychology, economics and more. Answers link straight back to the source studies, and you can filter by study design, journal quality, sample size and publication year to separate stronger evidence from weaker signals. Features like Deep Search, Topic Synthesis and Skills let researchers build a working knowledge base over time rather than starting from scratch on every query.

Consensus is designed for researchers, clinicians, students and analysts who need trustworthy signals from the scientific record without drowning in irrelevant results. A free tier gives limited AI-powered searches each month, while paid plans unlock unlimited use, advanced filters and deeper synthesis.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

- **Evidence-grounded answers:** Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
- **Consensus Meter:** A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
- **Powerful filters:** Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
- **Topic synthesis and Deep Search:** Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
- **Research workspace:** Save papers, organize sources and build a persistent knowledge base for literature reviews and ongoing projects.

**Strengths:** Answers cite real peer-reviewed papers, so claims are verifiable; Consensus Meter makes it easy to gauge scientific agreement at a glance; Rich filters help separate high-quality evidence from weaker studies; Fast, clean interface designed around research workflows

**Limitations:** Free tier caps the number of AI-assisted searches per month; Coverage is strongest for STEM and health fields, lighter for some humanities topics; It guides you toward sources but is not a substitute for reading full papers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus.md)

## Floatz

Floatz positions itself as an AI research engine for life-science questions. Rather than relying on manual literature reviews, it indexes and summarises scientific publications so users can interrogate a therapeutic area, a target or a company's science and get a consolidated view in minutes rather than weeks.

The platform is aimed at two overlapping audiences: investors doing scientific due diligence on biotech and life-science assets, and research teams who need fast, cited groundwork on drug targets, pathways and emerging evidence. Results are presented as structured summaries with the underlying papers kept as traceable references.

Floatz does not publish self-serve pricing; the site directs buyers to request access, which is typical of enterprise/investor-grade research tools where seats and data volumes are negotiated. Because capabilities and data coverage evolve quickly, it is worth confirming the current scope of literature coverage directly with the vendor.

**Pricing & Plans:** Contact for pricing — Floatz does not list public plans on its website and directs interested users to get in touch.

- **Scientific literature search and analysis:** Search and analyse large bodies of scientific papers to answer specific research or therapeutic-area questions.
- **Structured summaries with sources:** Distils dense literature into readable, source-linked summaries so findings can be traced back to the original publications.
- **Target and pathway discovery support:** Helps surface high-potential drug targets and relevant biological pathways across large document sets.
- **Due-diligence workflows for investors:** Frames evidence around scientific risk so life-science investors can review a thesis before capital is committed.
- **Built for non-programmers:** A web interface aimed at analysts and researchers rather than bioinformaticians, so no coding or command-line work is required.

**Strengths:** Focuses on life-science evidence rather than generic text, so outputs are framed around targets, pathways and scientific risk; Saves the weeks normally spent on manual literature triage; Aims to keep summaries traceable to source publications, which matters for audit and investment memos; Browser-based, so analysts and investors can use it without a bioinformatics stack

**Limitations:** No public pricing or self-serve trial published on the site, so onboarding likely requires a sales conversation; Coverage and accuracy depend on the literature and data sources it indexes, which are not fully documented publicly; Best suited to life-science questions — it is not a general-purpose research assistant

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/floatz-ai.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Consensus and Floatz compare in monthly traffic?

Consensus has 6,014,388 monthly visits, while Floatz has 253. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Consensus has a month-over-month growth rate of -1.2%; Floatz has -36.8%.

### How does pricing compare?

Consensus: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options. Floatz: Contact for Pricing. Contact for pricing — Floatz does not list public plans on its website and directs interested users to get in touch.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Covers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Semantic Scholar](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar) | 8,198,672 | +5.8% | Free | A free, AI-powered academic search engine for 240M+ papers across every scientific field | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar.md) |
| 3 | [Kagi Search](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search) | 4,647,605 | +3.2% | Free Trial, Paid | A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search.md) |
| 4 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | AI research platform for reading, understanding and writing scientific papers | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 5 | [Elicit](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit) | 1,751,507 | +3.1% | Freemium | AI research assistant for evidence-based literature review and synthesis | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit.md) |
| 6 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) |
| 7 | [Rayyan](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan) | 1,116,437 | +7.9% | Freemium | AI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan.md) |
| 8 | [Scite](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite) | 841,974 | +1.1% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | AI answers grounded in 300M+ scholarly full texts | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite.md) |
| 9 | [ResearchRabbit](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit) | 831,571 | +3.1% | Free | Excellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit.md) |
| 10 | [Connected Papers](https://openaitools.app/tool/connected-papers) | 750,576 | +3.1% | Freemium | Visualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/connected-papers.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/consensus-vs-floatz-ai

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)