# Consensus vs FN2

Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. FN2 records 0 monthly visits with 0% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Consensus](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus) | [FN2](https://openaitools.app/tool/fn2) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://consensus.app | https://fn2.ai |
| Categories | AI Search Engine, AI Research Tool, AI Papers, AI Article Summarizer | AI For Finance, AI Investing, AI Agent |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 6,014,388 | 0 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -1.2% | 0% |
| Primary Market | United States | Global |
| Direct Visits | 2,918,713 | 0 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.3 |
| Saved Count | 31 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Consensus

Consensus works like a scholarly search engine supercharged by AI. Instead of returning a flat list of PDFs, you ask a natural-language research question and Consensus extracts claims from relevant papers, then shows you what the studies actually find. A Consensus Meter summarizes the weight of evidence for yes/no questions, so you can see at a glance whether scientists largely agree, disagree, or remain divided.

The platform indexes hundreds of millions of peer-reviewed papers spanning medicine, biology, psychology, economics and more. Answers link straight back to the source studies, and you can filter by study design, journal quality, sample size and publication year to separate stronger evidence from weaker signals. Features like Deep Search, Topic Synthesis and Skills let researchers build a working knowledge base over time rather than starting from scratch on every query.

Consensus is designed for researchers, clinicians, students and analysts who need trustworthy signals from the scientific record without drowning in irrelevant results. A free tier gives limited AI-powered searches each month, while paid plans unlock unlimited use, advanced filters and deeper synthesis.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

- **Evidence-grounded answers:** Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
- **Consensus Meter:** A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
- **Powerful filters:** Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
- **Topic synthesis and Deep Search:** Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
- **Research workspace:** Save papers, organize sources and build a persistent knowledge base for literature reviews and ongoing projects.

**Strengths:** Answers cite real peer-reviewed papers, so claims are verifiable; Consensus Meter makes it easy to gauge scientific agreement at a glance; Rich filters help separate high-quality evidence from weaker studies; Fast, clean interface designed around research workflows

**Limitations:** Free tier caps the number of AI-assisted searches per month; Coverage is strongest for STEM and health fields, lighter for some humanities topics; It guides you toward sources but is not a substitute for reading full papers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus.md)

## FN2

FN2 is built around a simple idea: instead of you hunting through filings and transcripts, autonomous agents do the reading and hand you a cited summary. You define an agent in natural language, pick a cadence, and FN2 re-runs it on live data every market day. Delivery lands in-app, by email, or in Discord, so the briefing reaches you rather than the other way round.

Data grounding is a core design choice. FN2 reads filings directly from SEC EDGAR, searches 10,000+ earnings transcripts by meaning rather than exact wording, pulls macro series from FRED, and sources quotes and charts from Polygon.io. Prediction market odds from Polymarket sit beside the price action they help explain. Every answer is numbered and linked back to the document that produced it, and every agent run is logged.

FN2 is an independent product from FN2 LLC, founded by Andreas Echavez, aimed at individual investors who want institutional-grade research workflows without institutional pricing. It is explicitly a research tool, not financial advice, and the team states that you own your data.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier lets you create your first agent and try live cited answers without a credit card. Paid individual plans are Pro at $29/month (up to 7 active agent slots, 1 hourly plus 6 daily), Ultra at $89/month (up to 21 slots), and Max at $199/month (up to 42 slots). A custom Enterprise tier adds Slack, webhooks, dedicated delivery, and volume pricing.

- **Scheduled autonomous agents:** Turn a research question into a recurring agent that runs every market day and delivers a briefed, structured report automatically.
- **Filings and earnings analysis:** FN2 reads SEC EDGAR filings and more than 10,000 earnings call transcripts, summarizes the metrics that matter, and tags each claim with a source.
- **Live charts and market data:** Interactive price and volume charts for any ticker, spanning a single day to five years, with citations on what is driving the move.
- **Macro and rates context:** Pull interest rates, inflation, and volatility from Federal Reserve (FRED) data and pair them with Polymarket prediction odds for context.
- **Open API and agent integrations:** An open API plus a plugin for tools such as Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, so your own agents can request grounded market research or create and schedule FN2 runs.

**Strengths:** Fully cited outputs that link every claim back to the filing, transcript, or data series used; Agent-based automation pushes research to you instead of requiring manual searching; Full data set (SEC EDGAR, transcripts, FRED, Polygon prices) is included on every plan tier; Open API and plugin support so external agents can query or drive FN2 workflows

**Limitations:** Not financial advice, so it cannot be used as a substitute for professional judgment or certified advisors; Scheduled agent runs consume capacity slots, so heavy users may need higher-priced tiers; Value depends on the quality of the underlying public data and the agent prompts you write; Chrome-style simplicity is not the goal; newcomers may need a moment to learn agent slots and schedules

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/fn2.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Consensus and FN2 compare in monthly traffic?

Consensus has 6,014,388 monthly visits, while FN2 has 0. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Consensus has a month-over-month growth rate of -1.2%; FN2 has 0%.

### How does pricing compare?

Consensus: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options. FN2: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier lets you create your first agent and try live cited answers without a credit card. Paid individual plans are Pro at $29/month (up to 7 active agent slots, 1 hourly plus 6 daily), Ultra at $89/month (up to 21 slots), and Max at $199/month (up to 42 slots). A custom Enterprise tier adds Slack, webhooks, dedicated delivery, and volume pricing.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Covers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Semantic Scholar](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar) | 8,198,672 | +5.8% | Free | Completely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar.md) |
| 3 | [Kagi Search](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search) | 4,647,605 | +3.2% | Free Trial, Paid | A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search.md) |
| 4 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 5 | [Elicit](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit) | 1,751,507 | +3.1% | Freemium | Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit.md) |
| 6 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) |
| 7 | [Rayyan](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan) | 1,116,437 | +7.9% | Freemium | AI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan.md) |
| 8 | [MacroMicro](https://openaitools.app/tool/macromicro) | 928,258 | +22.5% | Freemium, Paid | Global macro data and AI research platform for smarter economic decisions | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/macromicro.md) |
| 9 | [Scite](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite) | 841,974 | +1.1% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite.md) |
| 10 | [ResearchRabbit](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit) | 831,571 | +3.1% | Free | Excellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/consensus-vs-fn2

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)