# Consensus vs Forma

Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Forma records 2,864 monthly visits with -11.5% growth and Free pricing.

| Metric | [Consensus](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus) | [Forma](https://openaitools.app/tool/forma) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://consensus.app | https://forma.run |
| Categories | AI Search Engine, AI Research Tool, AI Papers, AI Article Summarizer | AI Fitness, AI Sports, AI Healthcare |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 6,014,388 | 2,864 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -1.2% | -11.5% |
| Primary Market | United States | India |
| Direct Visits | 2,918,713 | 1,012 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4 |
| Saved Count | 31 | 3 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Consensus

Consensus works like a scholarly search engine supercharged by AI. Instead of returning a flat list of PDFs, you ask a natural-language research question and Consensus extracts claims from relevant papers, then shows you what the studies actually find. A Consensus Meter summarizes the weight of evidence for yes/no questions, so you can see at a glance whether scientists largely agree, disagree, or remain divided.

The platform indexes hundreds of millions of peer-reviewed papers spanning medicine, biology, psychology, economics and more. Answers link straight back to the source studies, and you can filter by study design, journal quality, sample size and publication year to separate stronger evidence from weaker signals. Features like Deep Search, Topic Synthesis and Skills let researchers build a working knowledge base over time rather than starting from scratch on every query.

Consensus is designed for researchers, clinicians, students and analysts who need trustworthy signals from the scientific record without drowning in irrelevant results. A free tier gives limited AI-powered searches each month, while paid plans unlock unlimited use, advanced filters and deeper synthesis.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

- **Evidence-grounded answers:** Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
- **Consensus Meter:** A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
- **Powerful filters:** Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
- **Topic synthesis and Deep Search:** Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
- **Research workspace:** Save papers, organize sources and build a persistent knowledge base for literature reviews and ongoing projects.

**Strengths:** Answers cite real peer-reviewed papers, so claims are verifiable; Consensus Meter makes it easy to gauge scientific agreement at a glance; Rich filters help separate high-quality evidence from weaker studies; Fast, clean interface designed around research workflows

**Limitations:** Free tier caps the number of AI-assisted searches per month; Coverage is strongest for STEM and health fields, lighter for some humanities topics; It guides you toward sources but is not a substitute for reading full papers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus.md)

## Forma

Forma is a lightweight web tool for runners who want a second opinion on their mechanics without booking a gait lab or a physio session. You upload a video of yourself running, and the service runs an AI-powered analysis that frames the results in the language of running efficiency and injury prevention. The site describes the analysis as expert-level and notes that it was designed by sports medicine professionals, which sets expectations that the feedback is coaching-oriented rather than a bare measurement readout.

The appeal is accessibility. Traditional running gait analysis often requires finding a specialist, booking time, and paying a consultation fee. Forma collapses that into an upload, which makes it realistic to check your form after a training block change, after an injury layoff, or when a new shoe or surface alters how you move.

Because the product is free and the interface is deliberately minimal, Forma fits best as a recurring self-check rather than a one-off appointment. It does not replace a clinician when you have genuine pain, but it can help you notice patterns, compare how you look over time, and prepare better questions for a coach or medical professional.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free. The site presents the running analysis at no cost, with no published subscription or per-analysis pricing visible.

- **AI running form review:** Submit a video of your running gait and receive an automated analysis of your technique rather than a raw recording with no interpretation.
- **Sports-medicine framing:** Analysis is presented through a sports medicine lens, focusing on efficiency and injury-prevention cues rather than generic fitness scoring.
- **Simple video upload:** A dedicated upload flow keeps the process to a single step: capture your run, upload the clip, and get feedback.
- **Free to use:** The tool is offered at no cost, making it practical to re-analyze your form repeatedly as your training evolves.

**Strengths:** Free access removes the cost barrier that usually accompanies gait analysis; Designed with input from sports medicine professionals rather than built as a generic pose estimator; Feedback is framed around practical running efficiency and injury prevention; Very low friction: just record and upload a video

**Limitations:** As a browser app it depends on JavaScript, so it will not work with scripts disabled; The site offers limited written detail about the underlying model and its accuracy; It is guidance for self-directed training, not a clinical assessment

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/forma.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Consensus and Forma compare in monthly traffic?

Consensus has 6,014,388 monthly visits, while Forma has 2,864. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Consensus has a month-over-month growth rate of -1.2%; Forma has -11.5%.

### How does pricing compare?

Consensus: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options. Forma: Free. Free. The site presents the running analysis at no cost, with no published subscription or per-analysis pricing visible.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Covers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Semantic Scholar](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar) | 8,198,672 | +5.8% | Free | Completely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar.md) |
| 3 | [Veo Sports Camera](https://openaitools.app/tool/veo-co) | 5,044,488 | +5.4% | Paid | Record, stream and analyse every match automatically | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/veo-co.md) |
| 4 | [Kagi Search](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search) | 4,647,605 | +3.2% | Free Trial, Paid | A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search.md) |
| 5 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 6 | [Elicit](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit) | 1,751,507 | +3.1% | Freemium | Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit.md) |
| 7 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) |
| 8 | [Rayyan](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan) | 1,116,437 | +7.9% | Freemium | AI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan.md) |
| 9 | [Scite](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite) | 841,974 | +1.1% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite.md) |
| 10 | [ResearchRabbit](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit) | 831,571 | +3.1% | Free | Excellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/consensus-vs-forma

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)