# Consensus vs GPTKeeper

Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. GPTKeeper records 0 monthly visits with — growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Consensus](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus) | [GPTKeeper](https://openaitools.app/tool/gptkeeper) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://consensus.app | https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/gptkeeper/cpepihhipmgnmnndplnahdonbcbjmbbg |
| Categories | AI Search Engine, AI Research Tool, AI Papers, AI Article Summarizer | AI Knowledge Management, AI Chatbot |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 6,014,388 | 0 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -1.2% | — |
| Primary Market | United States | Global |
| Direct Visits | 2,918,713 | 0 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Saved Count | 31 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Browser Extension |

## Consensus

Consensus works like a scholarly search engine supercharged by AI. Instead of returning a flat list of PDFs, you ask a natural-language research question and Consensus extracts claims from relevant papers, then shows you what the studies actually find. A Consensus Meter summarizes the weight of evidence for yes/no questions, so you can see at a glance whether scientists largely agree, disagree, or remain divided.

The platform indexes hundreds of millions of peer-reviewed papers spanning medicine, biology, psychology, economics and more. Answers link straight back to the source studies, and you can filter by study design, journal quality, sample size and publication year to separate stronger evidence from weaker signals. Features like Deep Search, Topic Synthesis and Skills let researchers build a working knowledge base over time rather than starting from scratch on every query.

Consensus is designed for researchers, clinicians, students and analysts who need trustworthy signals from the scientific record without drowning in irrelevant results. A free tier gives limited AI-powered searches each month, while paid plans unlock unlimited use, advanced filters and deeper synthesis.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

- **Evidence-grounded answers:** Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
- **Consensus Meter:** A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
- **Powerful filters:** Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
- **Topic synthesis and Deep Search:** Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
- **Research workspace:** Save papers, organize sources and build a persistent knowledge base for literature reviews and ongoing projects.

**Strengths:** Answers cite real peer-reviewed papers, so claims are verifiable; Consensus Meter makes it easy to gauge scientific agreement at a glance; Rich filters help separate high-quality evidence from weaker studies; Fast, clean interface designed around research workflows

**Limitations:** Free tier caps the number of AI-assisted searches per month; Coverage is strongest for STEM and health fields, lighter for some humanities topics; It guides you toward sources but is not a substitute for reading full papers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus.md)

## GPTKeeper

GPTKeeper exists to solve one very practical problem: ChatGPT conversations are easy to lose, hard to reference later, and awkward to send to other people. The extension attaches itself to your ChatGPT session and adds straightforward controls for capturing a whole thread, exporting it as a PDF document, and generating a link you can hand to a colleague, classmate or friend.

Because it is distributed through the Chrome Web Store, installation is a one-click affair and no separate account is required. The extension is deliberately narrow in scope: it does not try to become a chat client, a prompt library or a knowledge base. Instead it behaves like a clipboard for your AI conversations, which makes it quick to learn and light on system resources.

The listing notes a modest user base and the interface text is mainly in Japanese, so it is best suited to Japanese-speaking users or anyone comfortable working with a simple, icon-driven toolbar. It handles website content in order to read the conversation you are currently viewing.

**Pricing & Plans:** GPTKeeper is free to install from the Chrome Web Store. No paid tier or subscription is listed.

- **One-click conversation saving:** Capture an entire ChatGPT thread without copying and pasting message by message.
- **PDF export:** Download the saved conversation as a PDF file that can be archived, printed or attached to an email.
- **Link sharing:** Generate a shareable link for a conversation so others can read it without a screen recording or screenshot.
- **Social network sharing:** Publish a conversation directly to networks such as Facebook or Twitter, or embed it on a website.
- **No account needed:** Runs as a browser extension with no sign-up, keeping the workflow to a couple of clicks.

**Strengths:** Very simple, focused workflow that takes only a few clicks; PDF export gives you a durable offline copy of a conversation; Free to install with no account or sign-up required; Small download size, so it barely affects browser performance

**Limitations:** Interface text is mainly in Japanese, which limits accessibility for other audiences; Last updated in 2023, so it may lag behind newer ChatGPT interface changes; Only useful to people already using ChatGPT in a Chrome-based browser

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/gptkeeper.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Consensus and GPTKeeper compare in monthly traffic?

Consensus has 6,014,388 monthly visits, while GPTKeeper has 0. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Consensus has a month-over-month growth rate of -1.2%; GPTKeeper has —.

### How does pricing compare?

Consensus: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options. GPTKeeper: Freemium. GPTKeeper is free to install from the Chrome Web Store. No paid tier or subscription is listed.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Covers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Semantic Scholar](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar) | 8,198,672 | +5.8% | Free | Completely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar.md) |
| 3 | [Kagi Search](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search) | 4,647,605 | +3.2% | Free Trial, Paid | A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search.md) |
| 4 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 5 | [Elicit](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit) | 1,751,507 | +3.1% | Freemium | Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit.md) |
| 6 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) |
| 7 | [Rayyan](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan) | 1,116,437 | +7.9% | Freemium | AI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan.md) |
| 8 | [Glasp](https://openaitools.app/tool/glasp) | 889,564 | -14.1% | Freemium | Highlight the web, learn in public, and build your AI clone | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/glasp.md) |
| 9 | [Scite](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite) | 841,974 | +1.1% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite.md) |
| 10 | [ResearchRabbit](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit) | 831,571 | +3.1% | Free | Excellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/consensus-vs-gptkeeper

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)