# Consensus vs Graph One

Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Graph One records 982 monthly visits with -30.4% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Consensus](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus) | [Graph One](https://openaitools.app/tool/graph-one) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://consensus.app | https://graph.one |
| Categories | AI Search Engine, AI Research Tool, AI Papers, AI Article Summarizer | AI Knowledge Graph, AI Lead Generation, AI Investing, AI For Data Analytics |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 6,014,388 | 982 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -1.2% | -30.4% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 2,918,713 | 384 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.1 |
| Saved Count | 31 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Consensus

Consensus works like a scholarly search engine supercharged by AI. Instead of returning a flat list of PDFs, you ask a natural-language research question and Consensus extracts claims from relevant papers, then shows you what the studies actually find. A Consensus Meter summarizes the weight of evidence for yes/no questions, so you can see at a glance whether scientists largely agree, disagree, or remain divided.

The platform indexes hundreds of millions of peer-reviewed papers spanning medicine, biology, psychology, economics and more. Answers link straight back to the source studies, and you can filter by study design, journal quality, sample size and publication year to separate stronger evidence from weaker signals. Features like Deep Search, Topic Synthesis and Skills let researchers build a working knowledge base over time rather than starting from scratch on every query.

Consensus is designed for researchers, clinicians, students and analysts who need trustworthy signals from the scientific record without drowning in irrelevant results. A free tier gives limited AI-powered searches each month, while paid plans unlock unlimited use, advanced filters and deeper synthesis.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

- **Evidence-grounded answers:** Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
- **Consensus Meter:** A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
- **Powerful filters:** Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
- **Topic synthesis and Deep Search:** Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
- **Research workspace:** Save papers, organize sources and build a persistent knowledge base for literature reviews and ongoing projects.

**Strengths:** Answers cite real peer-reviewed papers, so claims are verifiable; Consensus Meter makes it easy to gauge scientific agreement at a glance; Rich filters help separate high-quality evidence from weaker studies; Fast, clean interface designed around research workflows

**Limitations:** Free tier caps the number of AI-assisted searches per month; Coverage is strongest for STEM and health fields, lighter for some humanities topics; It guides you toward sources but is not a substitute for reading full papers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus.md)

## Graph One

Graph One, operated by Borg Collective GmbH, addresses a familiar problem at advisory firms, consultancies and investment teams: relationship knowledge lives in individual inboxes and half-filled CRMs. When a partner leaves or a client contact changes role, that institutional memory walks out of the door. Graph One ingests metadata from email, calendar, CRM systems and public sources, resolves duplicate people and organisations into single entities, and draws the connections between them.

The result is a firm-level view of the network. Team members can search for a person and get one authoritative record instead of scattered threads, and they can ask who has the strongest real connection to a target. Warm paths are ranked by actual evidence — shared meetings, shared threads — rather than self-reported contact frequency, so recommendations are defensible rather than guesswork.

The product is explicitly privacy-conscious in its design. Graph One states that it reads metadata only and never message content, and that the resulting graph stays the property of the firm rather than being pooled across customers. Deployment is assisted: because every firm's data landscape is different, Graph One is configured with you against your own systems rather than self-served. It is currently presented as a beta, with access arranged through a demo call.

**Pricing & Plans:** Graph One does not publish public pricing. The site promotes a demo-led process and describes the product as being in beta, so commercial terms are arranged directly with the company.

- **Unified person and organisation records:** Email, calendar, CRM and public-source data are resolved into one clean entity per person or company, ending the duplicate-record problem.
- **Evidence-ranked warm paths:** Introduction routes are scored from real shared meetings and threads, and each ranking comes with the underlying evidence attached.
- **Firm-wide network search:** Search across the whole graph and get a single answer per person instead of hunting through inboxes and CRM tabs.
- **Team memory that survives turnover:** Context stays attached to the person and organisation, so relationships persist when roles and staff change.
- **Metadata-only, firm-owned data:** Only metadata is processed — never message content — and the resulting graph is kept as the firm's own asset.

**Strengths:** Addresses a real pain point for advisory and deal-driven firms where relationship knowledge is fragmented; Warm-path recommendations are grounded in measurable interaction evidence, not self-reported familiarity; Metadata-only processing and firm-owned graph are strong, clearly stated privacy commitments; One authoritative record per person removes the duplicate-contact mess in most CRMs

**Limitations:** No public pricing and a demo-gated, assisted setup make it hard to evaluate without a sales conversation; Currently labelled a beta, so feature depth and stability may still be evolving; Value depends heavily on how much of the firm's communication actually flows through connected systems

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/graph-one.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Consensus and Graph One compare in monthly traffic?

Consensus has 6,014,388 monthly visits, while Graph One has 982. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Consensus has a month-over-month growth rate of -1.2%; Graph One has -30.4%.

### How does pricing compare?

Consensus: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options. Graph One: Contact for Pricing. Graph One does not publish public pricing. The site promotes a demo-led process and describes the product as being in beta, so commercial terms are arranged directly with the company.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Covers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Semantic Scholar](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar) | 8,198,672 | +5.8% | Free | Completely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar.md) |
| 3 | [Kagi Search](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search) | 4,647,605 | +3.2% | Free Trial, Paid | A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search.md) |
| 4 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 5 | [Elicit](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit) | 1,751,507 | +3.1% | Freemium | Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit.md) |
| 6 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) |
| 7 | [Clay](https://openaitools.app/tool/clay-2-0) | 1,267,465 | -2.7% | Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Build GTM systems that turn data into revenue | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/clay-2-0.md) |
| 8 | [Rayyan](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan) | 1,116,437 | +7.9% | Freemium | AI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan.md) |
| 9 | [Scite](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite) | 841,974 | +1.1% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite.md) |
| 10 | [ResearchRabbit](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit) | 831,571 | +3.1% | Free | Excellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/consensus-vs-graph-one

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)