# Consensus vs SuppCo

Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. SuppCo records 207,874 monthly visits with -21.9% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Consensus](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus) | [SuppCo](https://openaitools.app/tool/suppco) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://consensus.app | https://supp.co |
| Categories | AI Search Engine, AI Research Tool, AI Papers, AI Article Summarizer | AI Healthcare, AI Fitness, Other |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 6,014,388 | 207,874 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -1.2% | -21.9% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 2,918,713 | 66,271 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.1 |
| Saved Count | 31 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Consensus

Consensus works like a scholarly search engine supercharged by AI. Instead of returning a flat list of PDFs, you ask a natural-language research question and Consensus extracts claims from relevant papers, then shows you what the studies actually find. A Consensus Meter summarizes the weight of evidence for yes/no questions, so you can see at a glance whether scientists largely agree, disagree, or remain divided.

The platform indexes hundreds of millions of peer-reviewed papers spanning medicine, biology, psychology, economics and more. Answers link straight back to the source studies, and you can filter by study design, journal quality, sample size and publication year to separate stronger evidence from weaker signals. Features like Deep Search, Topic Synthesis and Skills let researchers build a working knowledge base over time rather than starting from scratch on every query.

Consensus is designed for researchers, clinicians, students and analysts who need trustworthy signals from the scientific record without drowning in irrelevant results. A free tier gives limited AI-powered searches each month, while paid plans unlock unlimited use, advanced filters and deeper synthesis.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

- **Evidence-grounded answers:** Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
- **Consensus Meter:** A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
- **Powerful filters:** Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
- **Topic synthesis and Deep Search:** Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
- **Research workspace:** Save papers, organize sources and build a persistent knowledge base for literature reviews and ongoing projects.

**Strengths:** Answers cite real peer-reviewed papers, so claims are verifiable; Consensus Meter makes it easy to gauge scientific agreement at a glance; Rich filters help separate high-quality evidence from weaker studies; Fast, clean interface designed around research workflows

**Limitations:** Free tier caps the number of AI-assisted searches per month; Coverage is strongest for STEM and health fields, lighter for some humanities topics; It guides you toward sources but is not a substitute for reading full papers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus.md)

## SuppCo

SuppCo positions itself as a companion app for supplement users rather than a shop. You add the products you already take, and SuppCo rates each one with its TrustScore system, a 29-attribute quality measure that weighs manufacturing standards, third-party testing, label accuracy and inactive ingredients. The score and the underlying evidence are shown openly, so a 9.8 "Excellent" rating on a fish oil is explained rather than asserted.

The other half of the product is personalisation. Stack analysis reviews your whole regimen for nutrient coverage, dosing and redundancy, then compares it against your goals and returns a StackScore with specific suggestions. SuppCo's expert panel, which includes physicians and nutrition coaches known for their work in functional medicine, contributes protocols for goals such as longevity, gut health, fitness, weight management and fertility, and a research center summarises what thousands of studies say about individual nutrients and popular ingredients.

Alongside the app, SuppCo runs a Buying Club that sells vetted products directly and returns a share of spend as credits, plus a community and editorial layer. The service is free to use, with an optional Pro subscription for deeper personalisation, and SuppCo now operates as part of Function following that acquisition.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. SuppCo is free for all users, including the stack tracker, TrustScore product ratings and research content. An optional Pro subscription unlocks advanced personalization tools, and the SuppCo Buying Club offers 30% back in Supp Credits on purchases.

- **TrustScore® quality ratings:** Scan or search products to see a quality rating built from 29 attributes covering manufacturing standards, testing benchmarks and inactive ingredients.
- **Personalized stack analysis:** Get a StackScore for your routine along with nutrient-level coverage, dosing feedback and gap analysis against your health goals.
- **Expert-designed protocols:** Follow regimens designed by clinicians and functional-medicine experts for goals like longevity, gut health, fitness, weight management and fertility.
- **Tracker with reminders:** Smart scheduling, reminders and daily intake logging so you actually stick to your supplement routine.
- **Research center and community:** Browse nutrient explainers, goal guides and protocols informed by thousands of published studies, plus a members' community.

**Strengths:** TrustScore turns supplement quality into a plain numeric rating with visible criteria; Stack analysis catches overlaps, dosing issues and coverage gaps across a whole routine; Protocols contributed by named, credentialed experts rather than anonymous listicles; Free core tier with no paywall on basic tracking and product research

**Limitations:** Health guidance is educational and not a substitute for professional medical advice; Pro tier required for the most advanced personalization features; Vendor-supplied listings and scores may not cover every niche or regional brand; App-centric experience, so desktop-only users get less value

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/suppco.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Consensus and SuppCo compare in monthly traffic?

Consensus has 6,014,388 monthly visits, while SuppCo has 207,874. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Consensus has a month-over-month growth rate of -1.2%; SuppCo has -21.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Consensus: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options. SuppCo: Freemium. Freemium. SuppCo is free for all users, including the stack tracker, TrustScore product ratings and research content. An optional Pro subscription unlocks advanced personalization tools, and the SuppCo Buying Club offers 30% back in Supp Credits on purchases.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Covers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Semantic Scholar](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar) | 8,198,672 | +5.8% | Free | Completely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar.md) |
| 3 | [Kagi Search](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search) | 4,647,605 | +3.2% | Free Trial, Paid | A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search.md) |
| 4 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 5 | [Elicit](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit) | 1,751,507 | +3.1% | Freemium | Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit.md) |
| 6 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) |
| 7 | [Rayyan](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan) | 1,116,437 | +7.9% | Freemium | AI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan.md) |
| 8 | [Scite](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite) | 841,974 | +1.1% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite.md) |
| 9 | [ResearchRabbit](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit) | 831,571 | +3.1% | Free | Excellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit.md) |
| 10 | [Connected Papers](https://openaitools.app/tool/connected-papers) | 750,576 | +3.1% | Freemium | Visualizes research connections through interactive graphs for literature discovery, but does not provide direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/connected-papers.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/consensus-vs-suppco

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)