# Consensus vs Suprmind

Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Suprmind records 111,310 monthly visits with -23.5% growth and Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Consensus](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus) | [Suprmind](https://openaitools.app/tool/suprmind) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://consensus.app | https://suprmind.ai |
| Categories | AI Search Engine, AI Research Tool, AI Papers, AI Article Summarizer | AI Models, AI For Finance, AI Legal Assistant, AI Project Management |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 6,014,388 | 111,310 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -1.2% | -23.5% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 2,918,713 | 21,123 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 31 | 2 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Consensus

Consensus works like a scholarly search engine supercharged by AI. Instead of returning a flat list of PDFs, you ask a natural-language research question and Consensus extracts claims from relevant papers, then shows you what the studies actually find. A Consensus Meter summarizes the weight of evidence for yes/no questions, so you can see at a glance whether scientists largely agree, disagree, or remain divided.

The platform indexes hundreds of millions of peer-reviewed papers spanning medicine, biology, psychology, economics and more. Answers link straight back to the source studies, and you can filter by study design, journal quality, sample size and publication year to separate stronger evidence from weaker signals. Features like Deep Search, Topic Synthesis and Skills let researchers build a working knowledge base over time rather than starting from scratch on every query.

Consensus is designed for researchers, clinicians, students and analysts who need trustworthy signals from the scientific record without drowning in irrelevant results. A free tier gives limited AI-powered searches each month, while paid plans unlock unlimited use, advanced filters and deeper synthesis.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

- **Evidence-grounded answers:** Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
- **Consensus Meter:** A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
- **Powerful filters:** Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
- **Topic synthesis and Deep Search:** Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
- **Research workspace:** Save papers, organize sources and build a persistent knowledge base for literature reviews and ongoing projects.

**Strengths:** Answers cite real peer-reviewed papers, so claims are verifiable; Consensus Meter makes it easy to gauge scientific agreement at a glance; Rich filters help separate high-quality evidence from weaker studies; Fast, clean interface designed around research workflows

**Limitations:** Free tier caps the number of AI-assisted searches per month; Coverage is strongest for STEM and health fields, lighter for some humanities topics; It guides you toward sources but is not a substitute for reading full papers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus.md)

## Suprmind

Suprmind is built around a specific thesis: a single confident AI answer is dangerous for high-stakes decisions, because models sound equally sure whether they are right or wrong. Its answer is to run five frontier models inside one shared conversation. Each model reads everything that came before it, so the fifth response is built on four rounds of reading, challenge and correction rather than being a standalone reply. When one model contradicts another or cites something that does not hold up, that conflict becomes visible signal instead of disappearing into a side-by-side comparison.

The platform offers a set of orchestration modes for different kinds of pressure. Sequential runs models one after another for depth; Super Mind fires all five at once with a synthesizer producing one unified answer; Debate, Red Team and First Principles push back on weak reasoning and on your own assumptions. A Scribe layer tracks decisions and next steps as you go, and the results are meant to leave the chat as a deliverable: 25+ document templates export a conversation as a decision brief, SWOT, strategy document or research paper in Markdown, PDF or DOCX.

Commercially it is aimed at professionals and teams making consequential calls in finance, legal, consulting, research and strategy. Pricing starts with a 7-day trial with no credit card, then tiers at $19, $45, $95 and $195 per month for increasing model access, usage and project capacity, with an Enterprise plan for shared projects, roles and an uptime SLA. Suprmind states that chats are not used for AI training and that infrastructure runs on EU servers with a Swiss database.

**Pricing & Plans:** 7-day free trial with no credit card. Spark is $19/month (GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, sequential and Super Mind modes, 8 document templates). Pro is $45/month and adds Perplexity for all five AIs, Debate, Red Team and First Principles modes, disagreement alerts and all 25+ templates. Frontier is $95/month with more usage and priority queue, and Power is $195/month with BYOK and the highest self-serve usage. Enterprise pricing for teams is available on request.

- **Five AIs in one thread:** GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and Perplexity respond in the same conversation, each reading what came before instead of answering in isolation.
- **Disagreement tracking:** When models contradict each other, the conflict is surfaced and indexed rather than averaged away, so you see both sides before deciding.
- **Multiple orchestration modes:** Sequential, Super Mind, Debate, Red Team, First Principles, Research and Symphony modes let you tune how much scrutiny a question gets.
- **Document generation:** Convert a finished conversation into a decision brief, SWOT, strategy extract or research paper with 25+ templates and Markdown, PDF or DOCX export.
- **Projects and knowledge base:** Upload long documents, keep project memory and let every model in the thread read the same source material.
- **Security and hosting:** Runs on EU servers with a Swiss database, encrypted in transit and at rest, with payments handled by FastSpring and no AI training on your chats.

**Strengths:** Answers are cross-checked by other models before you act on them; Disagreements are surfaced instead of silently averaged; Ends in an exportable document rather than a chat transcript; One subscription replaces five separate AI plans at a lower monthly cost

**Limitations:** It is a premium subscription compared with using one free AI chat; No image generation, unlike some of the individual AI subscriptions it replaces; The breadth of modes and features means a learning curve at the start; Five-model answers cost more time than a single quick reply for trivial questions

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/suprmind.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Consensus and Suprmind compare in monthly traffic?

Consensus has 6,014,388 monthly visits, while Suprmind has 111,310. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Consensus has a month-over-month growth rate of -1.2%; Suprmind has -23.5%.

### How does pricing compare?

Consensus: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options. Suprmind: Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing. 7-day free trial with no credit card. Spark is $19/month (GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, sequential and Super Mind modes, 8 document templates). Pro is $45/month and adds Perplexity for all five AIs, Debate, Red Team and First Principles modes, disagreement alerts and all 25+ templates. Frontier is $95/month with more usage and priority queue, and Power is $195/month with BYOK and the highest self-serve usage. Enterprise pricing for teams is available on request.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Covers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Semantic Scholar](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar) | 8,198,672 | +5.8% | Free | Completely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar.md) |
| 3 | [Kagi Search](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search) | 4,647,605 | +3.2% | Free Trial, Paid | A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search.md) |
| 4 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 5 | [Chatbot App](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatbot-app) | 2,170,883 | -9.7% | Freemium | Chat with 30+ leading AI models in one clean, fast workspace | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/chatbot-app.md) |
| 6 | [Elicit](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit) | 1,751,507 | +3.1% | Freemium | Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit.md) |
| 7 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) |
| 8 | [Rayyan](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan) | 1,116,437 | +7.9% | Freemium | AI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan.md) |
| 9 | [Scite](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite) | 841,974 | +1.1% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite.md) |
| 10 | [ResearchRabbit](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit) | 831,571 | +3.1% | Free | Excellent for visual citation mapping and literature discovery, but lacks automated paper Q&A and evidence synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/researchrabbit.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/consensus-vs-suprmind

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)