# Consensus vs Visual Field Test

Consensus records 6,014,388 monthly visits with -1.2% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Visual Field Test records 0 monthly visits with 0% growth and Free pricing.

| Metric | [Consensus](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus) | [Visual Field Test](https://openaitools.app/tool/visual-field-test) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://consensus.app | https://visualfieldtest.com |
| Categories | AI Search Engine, AI Research Tool, AI Papers, AI Article Summarizer | AI Symptom Checker, AI Healthcare, AI Detector, AI Monitor |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 6,014,388 | 0 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -1.2% | 0% |
| Primary Market | United States | Global |
| Direct Visits | 2,918,713 | 0 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.4 |
| Saved Count | 31 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Consensus

Consensus works like a scholarly search engine supercharged by AI. Instead of returning a flat list of PDFs, you ask a natural-language research question and Consensus extracts claims from relevant papers, then shows you what the studies actually find. A Consensus Meter summarizes the weight of evidence for yes/no questions, so you can see at a glance whether scientists largely agree, disagree, or remain divided.

The platform indexes hundreds of millions of peer-reviewed papers spanning medicine, biology, psychology, economics and more. Answers link straight back to the source studies, and you can filter by study design, journal quality, sample size and publication year to separate stronger evidence from weaker signals. Features like Deep Search, Topic Synthesis and Skills let researchers build a working knowledge base over time rather than starting from scratch on every query.

Consensus is designed for researchers, clinicians, students and analysts who need trustworthy signals from the scientific record without drowning in irrelevant results. A free tier gives limited AI-powered searches each month, while paid plans unlock unlimited use, advanced filters and deeper synthesis.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options.

- **Evidence-grounded answers:** Ask a research question in plain language and get answers synthesized from peer-reviewed studies, with each claim linked to its source paper.
- **Consensus Meter:** A visual summary shows how the scientific literature leans on a yes/no question, indicating agreement, disagreement or mixed evidence.
- **Powerful filters:** Narrow results by study design, sample size, journal quality, publication year and more to prioritize high-quality evidence.
- **Topic synthesis and Deep Search:** Aggregate findings across many studies into structured summaries that map what is known and where the gaps are.
- **Research workspace:** Save papers, organize sources and build a persistent knowledge base for literature reviews and ongoing projects.

**Strengths:** Answers cite real peer-reviewed papers, so claims are verifiable; Consensus Meter makes it easy to gauge scientific agreement at a glance; Rich filters help separate high-quality evidence from weaker studies; Fast, clean interface designed around research workflows

**Limitations:** Free tier caps the number of AI-assisted searches per month; Coverage is strongest for STEM and health fields, lighter for some humanities topics; It guides you toward sources but is not a substitute for reading full papers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/consensus.md)

## Visual Field Test

:

Visual Field Test is an independent, browser-based perimetry tool aimed at people who want to keep an eye on their peripheral vision between professional exams. After you cover one eye and fix your gaze on a central cross, small dots of light appear at random points around the screen; you press the space bar or click whenever you notice a flash. Each session runs about five minutes per eye and produces a colour-coded map where seen points and missed points are shown separately.

The platform offers two levels of testing. Simple mode gives a fast screening pass, while Advanced mode performs threshold testing on a 24-2 style point grid and reports clinical-style summary indices including Mean Deviation (MD) and Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD). Beyond the raw map, each result is accompanied by an AI-generated summary that describes your responses in plain language, along with your score, test duration and response-consistency checks.

Results are stored automatically and charted as per-eye trend lines so gradual changes become visible over weeks, months or years. A comparison view lines your tests up from oldest to newest and flags points that recovered on retest versus newly missed points, and you can export printable PDF reports covering the threshold map, grayscale, total deviation, probability map and global indices. Read-only sharing lets a doctor or family member review your history, and any test can be permanently deleted. The site is clear that this is an educational screening and monitoring aid, not a medical device or a diagnosis.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free for human users; no account fees or paid tiers are advertised for taking the visual field test. The site does charge automated crawlers and scrapers a per-request fee, but that does not affect normal visitors.

- **Guided home perimetry test:** A guided routine walks you through covering one eye, fixing on a central cross and pressing space or clicking whenever a light flash appears, taking about five minutes per eye.
- **Simple and Advanced test modes:** Simple mode screens your field quickly, while Advanced mode measures threshold sensitivity in decibels and reports Mean Deviation and Pattern Standard Deviation.
- **AI-powered plain-language summaries:** Every result arrives with a colour-coded map of seen versus missed points, a score, duration and response-consistency checks, plus a plain-language AI explanation.
- **Trend tracking and test comparison:** Tests are saved automatically and charted as per-eye consistency trends, with side-by-side comparison that highlights newly missed or recovered points and overall change.
- **PDF reports and secure sharing:** Export a printable PDF with threshold map, grayscale, total deviation, probability map and global indices, or share read-only access with a clinician or relative.

**Strengths:** Free to use in any modern browser, with no app install or clinic visit; Advanced mode reports decibel thresholds plus MD and PSD indices for deeper tracking; Automatic saving, per-eye trend charts and side-by-side test comparison; Printable PDF reports and read-only sharing with a clinician

**Limitations:** Browser-based screening is not a diagnostic medical device and cannot replace a clinical visual field exam; Results can be affected by screen calibration, room lighting, viewing distance and browser zoom; Simple mode is a coarse screen rather than an equivalent to in-clinic Humphrey 24-2 perimetry; Accurate threshold testing demands good fixation discipline, which some users find tiring

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/visual-field-test.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Consensus and Visual Field Test compare in monthly traffic?

Consensus has 6,014,388 monthly visits, while Visual Field Test has 0. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Consensus has a month-over-month growth rate of -1.2%; Visual Field Test has 0%.

### How does pricing compare?

Consensus: Freemium. Freemium. A free tier offers a limited number of AI-powered searches per month; paid individual plans unlock unlimited searches and advanced research features, with discounted student pricing and team/enterprise options. Visual Field Test: Free. Free for human users; no account fees or paid tiers are advertised for taking the visual field test. The site does charge automated crawlers and scrapers a per-request fee, but that does not affect normal visitors.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Perplexity](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai) | 88,310,223 | -3.7% | Freemium | Covers general web sources alongside academic papers, but lacks specialized scientific synthesis metrics and consensus ratings. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/perplexity-ai.md) |
| 2 | [Semantic Scholar](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar) | 8,198,672 | +5.8% | Free | Completely free access to a massive scholarly index, but offers less automated natural-language evidence synthesis than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/semantic-scholar.md) |
| 3 | [Kagi Search](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search) | 4,647,605 | +3.2% | Free Trial, Paid | A paid, ad-free search engine that answers to its users | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kagi-search.md) |
| 4 | [SciSpace](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace) | 4,464,111 | +8.6% | Freemium | Provides deeper PDF reading and interactive literature analysis tools, but is less focused on quick evidence aggregation. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scispace.md) |
| 5 | [Ubie](https://openaitools.app/tool/ubie) | 2,941,054 | -23.2% | Free | Free AI symptom checker developed by doctors | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/ubie.md) |
| 6 | [Elicit](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit) | 1,751,507 | +3.1% | Freemium | Performs advanced systematic review data extraction and evidence synthesis, but has a more complex interface than Consensus. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/elicit.md) |
| 7 | [Jenni](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni) | 1,498,133 | +5.2% | Freemium | The AI workspace where researchers read, write, and cite with every claim traceable to its source | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/jenni.md) |
| 8 | [Doctronic AI Doctors + Human Doctors](https://openaitools.app/tool/doctronic-ai-doctors-human-doctors) | 1,131,516 | -24.8% | Freemium | AI health guidance with licensed doctors on demand | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/doctronic-ai-doctors-human-doctors.md) |
| 9 | [Rayyan](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan) | 1,116,437 | +7.9% | Freemium | AI-assisted systematic review software for screening, extraction, and evidence synthesis at scale | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/rayyan.md) |
| 10 | [Scite](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite) | 841,974 | +1.1% | Free Trial, Contact for Pricing | Tracks how papers are cited with Smart Citations to gauge reliability, but features a less direct Q&A synthesis. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/scite.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/consensus-vs-visual-field-test

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)