# GitHub Copilot vs Trae

GitHub Copilot records 0 monthly visits with — month-over-month growth and Freemium, Free Trial, Paid pricing. Trae records 702,366 monthly visits with -7.8% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [GitHub Copilot](https://openaitools.app/tool/copilot) | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://github.com/features/copilot | https://www.trae.ai |
| Categories | AI Copilot, AI Code Assistant, AI Code Generator, AI Chatbot | AI Code Assistant, AI Code Generator, AI Agent, AI Developer Tools |
| Pricing Model | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 0 | 702,366 |
| MoM Growth Rate | — | -7.8% |
| Primary Market | Global | China |
| Direct Visits | 0 | 373,236 |
| Review Score | 4.8 | 4.7 |
| Saved Count | 6 | 6 |
| Supported Platforms | Open Source | Website |

## GitHub Copilot

GitHub Copilot began as an AI pair programmer that autocompleted the next line of code. It has since grown into a full coding agent that spans the whole development workflow: you can start from an issue, let Copilot gather the repository context, run the task, and get back a pull request that a human reviews and merges.

The product shows up wherever developers already work. In editors such as Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Xcode, Vim, Neovim, Zed, and Eclipse it provides inline completions, next-edit suggestions, and chat. It also runs in the terminal and CLI, a desktop app, on the web, on mobile, and inside Slack and Teams, and sessions can be resumed across those surfaces.

Copilot is flexible about models. You can let it pick an appropriate model per task, choose one explicitly, or connect your own API key for supported cloud providers and run models locally through Ollama or Foundry Local. Repository instructions, skills, and connectors let teams encode standards and pull in outside services so the agent follows house rules rather than guessing.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium with a free tier plus paid individual and business plans. At the time of review the individual plans were Free ($0 with a monthly completion allowance), Pro ($10 per user/month), Pro+ ($39 per user/month), and Max ($100 per user/month), with higher tiers adding premium models, more included usage, and priority access. Business and Enterprise plans are available separately. AI usage is metered in GitHub AI Credits on paid plans.

- **Code completion and next-edit suggestions:** Inline suggestions appear as you type, with multi-line completions and next-edit suggestions that anticipate follow-up changes across the file.
- **Agentic task execution:** Hand Copilot an issue or task and it works with repository context, runs sessions in parallel, and returns changes as pull requests for review.
- **Editor, terminal, and web coverage:** Use Copilot in major IDEs, the CLI, the desktop app, github.com, mobile, and chat tools such as Slack and Teams, continuing the same session across surfaces.
- **Model choice and bring-your-own key:** Let Copilot match a model to the task or choose one explicitly, and connect supported cloud providers with your own API key or run local models.
- **Code review and vulnerability checks:** Copilot finds quality and security issues in local changes before you open a pull request and can combine its review with team feedback and CI checks.

**Strengths:** Deep integration with GitHub issues, pull requests, and repository context; Available across editors, terminal, web, mobile, and chat surfaces; Flexible model selection plus bring-your-own-key and local model options; Generous free tier and a clear ladder of paid individual and business plans

**Limitations:** Agentic usage is metered, so heavy workflows can consume credits quickly; Individual tiers top out at $100 per user/month, which is steep for casual users; Some capabilities depend on GitHub-hosted repositories, which limits use with other forges

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/copilot.md)

## Trae

Trae is an AI development platform that puts a coding agent at the centre of the editing experience. Its main product, TraeCode, is a full IDE with an integrated AI panel: instead of merely completing the next line, the assistant can inspect your project, reason about the change you want, edit several files at once, and run commands to verify the result. The diff-based review flow keeps you in charge of what is applied.

The stated positioning is "Collaborate with Intelligence" — the assistant works alongside you rather than replacing the editor. Practical uses include generating boilerplate and new modules, refactoring messy code, explaining an unfamiliar repository, fixing failing tests, and translating a plain-language task into working changes. Because the agent has project context, results tend to be more coherent across a codebase than single-file completion.

Alongside TraeCode, TraeWork applies the same assistant model to general work tasks, so the platform covers both engineering and everyday productivity. Trae ships as a desktop download and can also be used in the browser, making it easy to adopt without disrupting a whole toolchain.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free to start, with paid upgrades that increase usage limits for premium models; enterprises can purchase through BytePlus. Usage is measured per AI request and varies by model, so heavy users should review the pricing page for current allowances before committing.

- **Project-aware code context:** Trae reads your project files and dependencies, so its suggestions account for how the codebase is actually structured rather than treating each file in isolation.
- **Agentic code generation and edits:** Describe a task and the agent plans and applies multi-file edits, shows a diff for review, and can run terminal commands as part of the change.
- **Debugging and code explanation:** Ask questions about unfamiliar code, get inline explanations, and have bugs or failing tests diagnosed and fixed with context.
- **TraeCode plus TraeWork:** TraeCode covers the coding workflow, while TraeWork applies an AI assistant to everyday knowledge tasks — both download for desktop, with a web option.
- **Free start with upgradable limits:** You can try it for free and scale up by choosing the plan that raises your usage limits, with enterprise options available.

**Strengths:** Free tier makes it easy to evaluate before paying; Agentic workflow handles multi-file changes and tests, not just autocomplete; Deep project context improves the relevance of suggestions; Covers both coding (TraeCode) and general work (TraeWork)

**Limitations:** Heavy usage of premium models quickly hits plan limits; It is a newer entrant, so some integrations and plugins are still maturing; Most of the polish is in the coding flow; other workflows are less developed; Usage-based limits can be confusing to predict for large teams

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do GitHub Copilot and Trae compare in monthly traffic?

GitHub Copilot has 0 monthly visits, while Trae has 702,366. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

GitHub Copilot has a month-over-month growth rate of —; Trae has -7.8%.

### How does pricing compare?

GitHub Copilot: Freemium, Free Trial, Paid. Freemium with a free tier plus paid individual and business plans. At the time of review the individual plans were Free ($0 with a monthly completion allowance), Pro ($10 per user/month), Pro+ ($39 per user/month), and Max ($100 per user/month), with higher tiers adding premium models, more included usage, and priority access. Business and Enterprise plans are available separately. AI usage is metered in GitHub AI Credits on paid plans. Trae: Freemium. Free to start, with paid upgrades that increase usage limits for premium models; enterprises can purchase through BytePlus. Usage is measured per AI request and varies by model, so heavy users should review the pricing page for current allowances before committing.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Claude](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2) | 1,253,439,413 | +23.8% | Freemium | Anthropic's frontier AI workspace powered by Claude 5.5 for agentic coding, analysis, and nuanced writing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/claude-2.md) |
| 2 | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | 23,297,751 | +8.4% | Freemium | Offers much deeper IDE integration and superior multi-file editing, but requires a paid subscription for full features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md) |
| 3 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Google's agent-first development platform for building and shipping software with AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 4 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Excels at instant browser-based cloud deployment and full-stack app generation, but is less suited for heavy local multi-repo workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 5 | [VS Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code) | 7,397,370 | -3.8% | Freemium | Provides ultimate extensibility and open-source flexibility, but requires assembling your own extension stack to match Trae's native AI features. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code.md) |
| 6 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Provides powerful codebase-wide agentic planning and completion, but operates primarily as a plugin rather than a dedicated IDE. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 7 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Uses rigorous spec-driven engineering plans to verify changes, though with a more structured and rigid workflow than Trae. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 8 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer that opens pull requests, but is much more expensive and task-oriented. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 9 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | Focuses on terminal-first workflows with open-weight models, but lacks the graphical multi-file interface of Trae. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 10 | [CodeRabbit](https://openaitools.app/tool/coderabbit) | 1,048,880 | +4.6% | Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing | AI code review, PR triage, and security monitoring for fast-moving teams | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/coderabbit.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/copilot-vs-trae

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)