How do their growth rates compare?

Crustdata has a month-over-month growth rate of +1.2%; Zinc has +49%.

How does pricing compare?

Crustdata: Contact for Pricing. Crustdata does not publish public list prices; pricing is arranged with the sales team based on use case and volume. A demo request and API key flow are available from the site. Zinc: Paid, usage-based (per successful order and per API call); volume terms via sales. Usage-based and self-serve. Zinc charges $1 per successful order plus the cost of the item, with failed orders not billed. Product data costs $0.01 per API call. Optional add-ons are $0.25 for hosted tracking links and emails, and $0.10 for each item beyond the first ten on a single order. Funding fees apply to wallet top-ups: card 2.9% + $0.30, ACH 0.8% capped at $5, wire a flat $15, with self-serve top-ups from $15 to $100,000. Volume discounts and custom terms start at roughly a thousand orders per month via sales.

What are alternatives to Crustdata and Zinc?

Other tools in related categories include Clay, TinyFish, Exa, Bright Data, Algolia.

Crustdata vs Zinc — Traffic (100.53K vs 13.03K), Pricing & Verdict

Open AI Tools

Crustdata vs Zinc — Traffic (100.53K vs 13.03K), Pricing & Verdict | Open AI Tools

Side-by-Side Traffic & Specification Matrix

Dimension / Metric	Crustdata	Zinc
Official Domain	crustdata.com	zinc.com
Pricing Model	Contact for Pricing	Paid, usage-based (per successful order and per API call); volume terms via sales
Monthly Visits	100.53K (100,533)	13.03K (13,032)
MoM Traffic Delta	+1.24K (+1.2%)	+4.28K (+49%)
Primary Market & Share	🇺🇸 United States (38.2%)	🇺🇸 United States (91.3%)
Direct Visits / mo	43.88K	7.69K
User Rating	4.5	4.5
Supported Platforms	Website	Website

Crustdata

Real-time B2B people and company data for AI agents

Live graph of 1B people and 100M+ companies

Every indexed web page is parsed and resolved into a single graph of people and companies that is re-verified continuously instead of archived.

REST API with intent-style filters

Compose structured conditions over headcount, headcount growth, funding raised, locations and more, with no filter menus or fixed list limits.

MCP server for agents

Drop the entire graph into an AI agent with a one-line MCP configuration so it can search, enrich and monitor without bespoke integration code.

Signals and watchers

Track role changes, funding events and hiring activity on the accounts and people you care about, so agent workflows act on what changed rather than what was true last quarter.

Strengths & Pros

+Very large, continuously refreshed graph spanning people and companies
+Both REST API and MCP, so it works for classic backends and for agents
+Intent-based querying removes the filter-menu and list-limit constraints of typical B2B tools
+Strong emphasis on fresh signals — role changes, funding, hiring — not just static firmographics