# cto.new vs Cursor

cto.new records 186,087 monthly visits with -25.9% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [cto.new](https://openaitools.app/tool/cto-new) | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://cto.new/product-hunt | https://www.cursor.com |
| Categories | AI Code Assistant, AI Agent, AI Code Generator, AI Developer Tools | AI Code Assistant, AI Developer Tools, AI Agent |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 186,087 | 23,297,751 |
| MoM Growth Rate | -25.9% | +8.4% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 81,140 | 14,683,770 |
| Review Score | 4.1 | 4.7 |
| Saved Count | 0 | 29 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## cto.new

cto.new is a chat-first platform from Engine Labs aimed at founders and solo entrepreneurs. Instead of assembling separate tools for a website, invoicing and outreach, you tell the AI team what you want to build and it produces working output — a published site, an app, product copy, an ad campaign or a reply to a customer.

The product bundles a surprising amount of business plumbing. You can build and publish a website or app by chatting, connect Stripe to accept payments and send invoices, register a custom domain, and set up a business email inbox where the AI team helps draft replies. It also supports ads on ChatGPT on paid plans.

The model stance is deliberately abstracted: users can let cto.new auto-select a model or ask for a surprise pick, so the platform can route work across frontier LLMs from providers such as Anthropic and OpenAI. The platform is free to start, with paid plans for extras like ad credits, and the site states that users own everything they build.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free to start with no credit card or API keys required. Some capabilities such as ads on ChatGPT are available on paid plans using ad credits; check the Pricing page for current plan details and limits.

- **Chat-driven website and app builder:** Describe what you want in natural language and the AI team generates and publishes a website or app, which you keep improving as your business grows.
- **Ready-made AI teams:** Start from preconfigured teams built for specific jobs, such as a Shop team for selling expertise or an Agency-in-a-Box team for client work.
- **Payments and invoicing via Stripe:** Connect Stripe to accept payments, send invoices and manage your business finances without leaving the platform.
- **Custom domains and business email:** Register a custom domain and set up a business inbox so the AI team can send emails and help handle replies.
- **Model-agnostic routing:** Let cto.new auto-select the best model for a task or ask it to surprise you, drawing on frontier models from leading providers.

**Strengths:** Genuinely free to start with no credit card or API keys; Bundles website building, payments, domains, email and ads in one place; Prebuilt AI teams give non-experts a starting point for specific business jobs; Users own what they build, per the platform's own FAQ

**Limitations:** Free plan has limitations that push heavier users toward paid tiers; Ads on ChatGPT require a paid plan and ad credits; Chat-driven building can require iteration before output matches your intent

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cto-new.md)

## Cursor

Cursor's editor looks familiar to anyone who has used a modern IDE, but the center of gravity is the agent. Instead of only suggesting the next line, it can read a task description, inspect the repository, produce an implementation plan, modify many files, run commands, and report back with a summary of what changed. Developers keep control by approving plans, reviewing diffs, and stepping in wherever judgment is needed.

The product has expanded well beyond a single application. Cloud agents can run on their own machines for extended periods, Cursor ships a CLI, and integrations bring the same agent into Slack and GitHub so work can be handed off without switching tools. A model picker lets you use frontier models from several providers, or rely on automatic selection per task.

This makes Cursor a good fit for teams that want measurable velocity gains on large codebases while keeping human review in the loop. The trade-offs are mostly about cost and process: capable agents consume quota, remote indexing raises questions for security-conscious organizations, and teams need light conventions for when to delegate versus write code directly.

**Pricing & Plans:** Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

- **Agent-driven code changes:** An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.
- **Cloud and parallel agents:** Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.
- **Tab completion and codebase context:** Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.
- **Multi-model flexibility:** Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.
- **CLI, Slack and GitHub workflows:** Run Cursor from the terminal, chat with it in Slack, and let it review or open pull requests in GitHub without leaving your workflow.

**Strengths:** Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits; Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub; Choose from multiple frontier models in one place; Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors

**Limitations:** Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage; Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively; Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly; Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do cto.new and Cursor compare in monthly traffic?

cto.new has 186,087 monthly visits, while Cursor has 23,297,751. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

cto.new has a month-over-month growth rate of -25.9%; Cursor has +8.4%.

### How does pricing compare?

cto.new: Freemium. Free to start with no credit card or API keys required. Some capabilities such as ads on ChatGPT are available on paid plans using ad credits; check the Pricing page for current plan details and limits. Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 2 | [Base44](https://openaitools.app/tool/base44) | 14,039,232 | +0.5% | Freemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing | Build working apps, websites, and AI agents by describing them | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/base44.md) |
| 3 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Enables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 4 | [VS Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code) | 7,397,370 | -3.8% | Freemium | Offers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code.md) |
| 5 | [Emergent](https://openaitools.app/tool/emergent) | 5,788,850 | +5% | Freemium | Describe an app in chat and ship it | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/emergent.md) |
| 6 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 7 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 8 | [Bolt.new](https://openaitools.app/tool/bolt-new) | 3,033,976 | -17.8% | Freemium | Build websites and apps by chatting with AI in your browser | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/bolt-new.md) |
| 9 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 10 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/cto-new-vs-cursor

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)