# Cursor vs DepsHub

Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. DepsHub records 2,742 monthly visits with +27.7% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | [DepsHub](https://openaitools.app/tool/depshub) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.cursor.com | https://depshub.com |
| Categories | AI Code Assistant, AI Developer Tools, AI Agent | AI Developer Tools, AI Copilot, AI Workflow, AI Monitor |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 23,297,751 | 2,742 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +8.4% | +27.7% |
| Primary Market | United States | India |
| Direct Visits | 14,683,770 | 1,066 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 29 | 1 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Cursor

Cursor's editor looks familiar to anyone who has used a modern IDE, but the center of gravity is the agent. Instead of only suggesting the next line, it can read a task description, inspect the repository, produce an implementation plan, modify many files, run commands, and report back with a summary of what changed. Developers keep control by approving plans, reviewing diffs, and stepping in wherever judgment is needed.

The product has expanded well beyond a single application. Cloud agents can run on their own machines for extended periods, Cursor ships a CLI, and integrations bring the same agent into Slack and GitHub so work can be handed off without switching tools. A model picker lets you use frontier models from several providers, or rely on automatic selection per task.

This makes Cursor a good fit for teams that want measurable velocity gains on large codebases while keeping human review in the loop. The trade-offs are mostly about cost and process: capable agents consume quota, remote indexing raises questions for security-conscious organizations, and teams need light conventions for when to delegate versus write code directly.

**Pricing & Plans:** Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

- **Agent-driven code changes:** An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.
- **Cloud and parallel agents:** Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.
- **Tab completion and codebase context:** Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.
- **Multi-model flexibility:** Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.
- **CLI, Slack and GitHub workflows:** Run Cursor from the terminal, chat with it in Slack, and let it review or open pull requests in GitHub without leaving your workflow.

**Strengths:** Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits; Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub; Choose from multiple frontier models in one place; Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors

**Limitations:** Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage; Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively; Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly; Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md)

## DepsHub

DepsHub replaces the scattered, manual work of dependency maintenance with one dashboard. Once you connect a repository, the platform builds a cross-repository inventory of every library and package you rely on, then tracks new releases, license terms, and published security advisories against it. Instead of a flood of unreadable version-bump notifications, you get a prioritised view of what actually needs attention.

What separates DepsHub from plain bot-based updaters is its AI-powered update engine. It reads the changelog and release notes of each library, inspects how your codebase uses the affected APIs, and generates a pull request that includes the necessary migration edits rather than only bumping the version string. Changelog analysis, manifest file analysis, smart scheduling, log history, and analytics are all built in, and the same engine powers license control so you can catch copyleft or otherwise risky licenses before legal does.

Integrations extend the workflow beyond the repository: DepsHub can create and update tickets in Linear and Jira, route events through Zapier to thousands of other apps, and post to GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. It supports JavaScript, Python, Go, Rust, Java, and PHP today, with more ecosystems planned, making it a practical fit for polyglot engineering organisations.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. DepsHub is free forever for open-source repositories and personal projects with unlimited public repos. The Professional plan is priced per code contributor at $19 per month (annual billing saves 20%) and adds unlimited private repositories, all integrations, unlimited security alerts, and 24/7 chat support. A custom Enterprise plan is available on request.

- **AI-powered automatic updates:** DepsHub processes library changelogs and release notes, inspects your codebase, and opens pull requests that include the breaking changes needed to complete the upgrade.
- **Cross-repository dependency overview:** See every dependency across all connected repositories in one inventory, so you stop digging through individual project manifests.
- **License compliance:** Continuously check the license terms of your dependencies and get warned about copyleft or otherwise problematic licenses before they reach production or a legal review.
- **Relevant security alerts:** Get notified when a dependency you actually use has a vulnerability, and update only when the advisory genuinely affects your code.
- **Ticket and workflow integrations:** Native GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket support plus Linear, Jira, and Zapier integrations to create tickets, push commits, and notify the rest of your stack.

**Strengths:** AI updates go beyond version bumps by including the breaking changes your codebase needs; Free forever for open-source repos with no credit card required; Single cross-repository inventory removes manifest-file archaeology; Licence control, security alerts, changelog analysis, and analytics in one place

**Limitations:** Professional pricing is per code contributor, which adds up for large teams; Language and ecosystem coverage is still expanding, so some toolchains are unsupported; No self-hosted option is currently offered for privacy-sensitive organisations

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/depshub.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Cursor and DepsHub compare in monthly traffic?

Cursor has 23,297,751 monthly visits, while DepsHub has 2,742. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Cursor has a month-over-month growth rate of +8.4%; DepsHub has +27.7%.

### How does pricing compare?

Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers. DepsHub: Freemium. Freemium. DepsHub is free forever for open-source repositories and personal projects with unlimited public repos. The Professional plan is priced per code contributor at $19 per month (annual billing saves 20%) and adds unlimited private repositories, all integrations, unlimited security alerts, and 24/7 chat support. A custom Enterprise plan is available on request.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 2 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Enables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 3 | [VS Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code) | 7,397,370 | -3.8% | Freemium | Offers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code.md) |
| 4 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 5 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 6 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 7 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 8 | [Aikido Security](https://openaitools.app/tool/aikido-security) | 757,491 | +9.6% | Freemium | All-in-one AppSec platform that finds and auto-fixes vulnerabilities | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/aikido-security.md) |
| 9 | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) | 702,366 | -7.8% | Freemium | Delivers a polished AI-native IDE experience with multi-file generation, but has a smaller ecosystem than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md) |
| 10 | [Warp](https://openaitools.app/tool/warp-ai) | 657,372 | -9.3% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | AI-powered terminal and agentic software factory for development teams | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/warp-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/cursor-vs-depshub

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)