# Cursor vs gpt-counter

Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. gpt-counter records 0 monthly visits with — growth and Free pricing.

| Metric | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | [gpt-counter](https://openaitools.app/tool/gpt-counter) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.cursor.com | https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/gpt-counter/lhgnfadhljgjgmpgfddjeiolilgfcnon |
| Categories | AI Code Assistant, AI Developer Tools, AI Agent | AI Developer Tools, AI Productivity Tools, AI Monitor |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Free |
| Monthly Visits | 23,297,751 | 0 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +8.4% | — |
| Primary Market | United States | Global |
| Direct Visits | 14,683,770 | 0 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 3.6 |
| Saved Count | 29 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Browser Extension |

## Cursor

Cursor's editor looks familiar to anyone who has used a modern IDE, but the center of gravity is the agent. Instead of only suggesting the next line, it can read a task description, inspect the repository, produce an implementation plan, modify many files, run commands, and report back with a summary of what changed. Developers keep control by approving plans, reviewing diffs, and stepping in wherever judgment is needed.

The product has expanded well beyond a single application. Cloud agents can run on their own machines for extended periods, Cursor ships a CLI, and integrations bring the same agent into Slack and GitHub so work can be handed off without switching tools. A model picker lets you use frontier models from several providers, or rely on automatic selection per task.

This makes Cursor a good fit for teams that want measurable velocity gains on large codebases while keeping human review in the loop. The trade-offs are mostly about cost and process: capable agents consume quota, remote indexing raises questions for security-conscious organizations, and teams need light conventions for when to delegate versus write code directly.

**Pricing & Plans:** Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

- **Agent-driven code changes:** An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.
- **Cloud and parallel agents:** Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.
- **Tab completion and codebase context:** Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.
- **Multi-model flexibility:** Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.
- **CLI, Slack and GitHub workflows:** Run Cursor from the terminal, chat with it in Slack, and let it review or open pull requests in GitHub without leaving your workflow.

**Strengths:** Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits; Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub; Choose from multiple frontier models in one place; Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors

**Limitations:** Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage; Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively; Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly; Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md)

## gpt-counter

gpt-counter is a small Chrome extension with an unusual goal: helping developers use ChatGPT less, not more. It limits how many questions you can ask and visualizes that usage in the browser, so you can see how often you reach for the assistant. The developer wrote it for engineers who noticed that leaning on ChatGPT had reduced their own problem solving and pushed genuine understanding further away.

In practice the extension sits alongside the ChatGPT website and keeps a visible tally of your questions. Instead of blocking the tool outright, it turns your usage into something you can monitor, which makes the restraint a conscious decision rather than an accident.

It is a deliberately narrow, single-purpose utility aimed at self-improvement. The interface is in Japanese, the project is at version 0.0.2 and was last updated in April 2024, and it has no user ratings yet. Developers looking for a lightweight self-control tool rather than a productivity booster are the target audience.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free. The extension is offered at no cost through the Chrome Web Store.

- **Question limit:** Set a ceiling on how many ChatGPT questions you allow yourself, so the count does not run away unnoticed.
- **Usage visualization:** See your question count clearly displayed in the browser instead of tracking it mentally.
- **Built for engineers:** Designed specifically for developers who noticed their own problem-solving skills slipping.
- **Lightweight browser extension:** A small Chrome add-on that runs alongside ChatGPT rather than replacing or changing it.

**Strengths:** Clear single purpose: limiting and visualizing ChatGPT question counts; Useful for developers worried about over-reliance on AI answers; Simple lightweight Chrome extension, no complex setup; Developer explicitly discloses the user activity data it handles

**Limitations:** Last updated in April 2024 and still at version 0.0.2, so it is early-stage software; No user ratings yet and a small install base; Interface is Japanese-only, limiting use for other audiences

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/gpt-counter.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Cursor and gpt-counter compare in monthly traffic?

Cursor has 23,297,751 monthly visits, while gpt-counter has 0. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Cursor has a month-over-month growth rate of +8.4%; gpt-counter has —.

### How does pricing compare?

Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers. gpt-counter: Free. Free. The extension is offered at no cost through the Chrome Web Store.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 2 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Enables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 3 | [VS Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code) | 7,397,370 | -3.8% | Freemium | Offers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code.md) |
| 4 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 5 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 6 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 7 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 8 | [AIPRM](https://openaitools.app/tool/aiprm) | 708,870 | -6.9% | Freemium, Paid | A prompt library and management layer for ChatGPT and other AI models | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/aiprm.md) |
| 9 | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) | 702,366 | -7.8% | Freemium | Delivers a polished AI-native IDE experience with multi-file generation, but has a smaller ecosystem than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md) |
| 10 | [Warp](https://openaitools.app/tool/warp-ai) | 657,372 | -9.3% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | AI-powered terminal and agentic software factory for development teams | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/warp-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/cursor-vs-gpt-counter

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)