# Cursor vs Joxo

Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Joxo records 0 monthly visits with 0% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | [Joxo](https://openaitools.app/tool/joxo) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.cursor.com | https://joxo.ai |
| Categories | AI Code Assistant, AI Developer Tools, AI Agent | AI Agent, AI Developer Tools, AI Project Management, AI Workflow |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 23,297,751 | 0 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +8.4% | 0% |
| Primary Market | United States | Global |
| Direct Visits | 14,683,770 | 0 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 29 | 1 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Cursor

Cursor's editor looks familiar to anyone who has used a modern IDE, but the center of gravity is the agent. Instead of only suggesting the next line, it can read a task description, inspect the repository, produce an implementation plan, modify many files, run commands, and report back with a summary of what changed. Developers keep control by approving plans, reviewing diffs, and stepping in wherever judgment is needed.

The product has expanded well beyond a single application. Cloud agents can run on their own machines for extended periods, Cursor ships a CLI, and integrations bring the same agent into Slack and GitHub so work can be handed off without switching tools. A model picker lets you use frontier models from several providers, or rely on automatic selection per task.

This makes Cursor a good fit for teams that want measurable velocity gains on large codebases while keeping human review in the loop. The trade-offs are mostly about cost and process: capable agents consume quota, remote indexing raises questions for security-conscious organizations, and teams need light conventions for when to delegate versus write code directly.

**Pricing & Plans:** Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

- **Agent-driven code changes:** An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.
- **Cloud and parallel agents:** Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.
- **Tab completion and codebase context:** Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.
- **Multi-model flexibility:** Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.
- **CLI, Slack and GitHub workflows:** Run Cursor from the terminal, chat with it in Slack, and let it review or open pull requests in GitHub without leaving your workflow.

**Strengths:** Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits; Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub; Choose from multiple frontier models in one place; Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors

**Limitations:** Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage; Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively; Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly; Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md)

## Joxo

Joxo starts from a simple observation: coding agents are already good at individual work, but teams still lose the context that sits between people. Its answer is a shared project space where each teammate connects the agent they already use — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode and others. Agents can then ask a teammate's agent for help, so knowledge learned in one person's session becomes available to the whole project rather than disappearing when a terminal closes.

On the desktop, Joxo is a window that groups every running session by project, with the one that needs you pinned at the top. A team-wide session view shows what is running on each computer and what finished, a shared board tracks who is on what task, and a chat room mixes people and agents so agents can report progress as they go. Joxo also keeps the machine awake while agents work, warns before an agent deletes something like your home folder, and lets you see and control your screen from the iPhone app — so a blocked agent can be unblocked from anywhere.

The product deliberately does not bundle an AI model. Everyone keeps their own coding-agent plan, and Joxo connects them; teams using only ChatGPT or Claude in a browser can also add Joxo without installing anything. Pricing runs from a free tier for up to three people in one project, through per-person Pro and per-seat Business plans, up to Enterprise with company sign-in, audit-log export and per-computer approval.

**Pricing & Plans:** Free to start with no credit card: up to 3 people in 1 project with 7 days of history. Joxo Pro is $15 per person per month, or $12 per month billed yearly ($144); Business is $19 per seat per month, or $15 off a yearly plan, minimum 3 seats; Enterprise starts at $40 per seat per month, minimum 25 seats, with company sign-in, audit-log export and approval for every new computer. A founding price for the first 20 teams gives Pro at $8 and Business at $10 per seat for 12 months. Web purchases can be refunded within 30 days.

- **Cross-agent handoffs:** Your agent can ask a teammate's agent for the answer it is missing, then apply the result in your own session — so knowledge from one person's work benefits the whole project.
- **Shared JOXO.md project memory:** A single notes file teaches every agent connected to the project how your team builds software, and it compounds the longer the team uses it.
- **Desktop app for every session:** Group Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini and OpenCode sessions by project in one window, with anything waiting on you pinned to the top.
- **Board, chat and session visibility:** One task board shows who is on what, team chat mixes people and agents, and a session view reports what is running on every team computer and what finished.
- **Phone approvals and remote screen:** Answer blocked agents with one tap from the iPhone app, and see or control a machine's screen remotely; Joxo can also keep the computer awake while agents run.

**Strengths:** Works with the coding agents teams already pay for, so no new AI subscription or API billing is required; Free tier has no card requirement and supports up to three people plus one project; Genuinely shared context (JOXO.md, board, session view) instead of a per-developer silo; iPhone approvals and remote screen access make long-running agent work practical from anywhere

**Limitations:** Does not include or resell an AI model — you must already have a coding-agent plan; Free tier caps the workspace at 3 people, 1 project and 7 days of history; Collaboration features offer the most value to teams; a solo developer may find little to add; Pricing is per person on Pro, so costs scale with headcount

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/joxo.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Cursor and Joxo compare in monthly traffic?

Cursor has 23,297,751 monthly visits, while Joxo has 0. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Cursor has a month-over-month growth rate of +8.4%; Joxo has 0%.

### How does pricing compare?

Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers. Joxo: Freemium. Free to start with no credit card: up to 3 people in 1 project with 7 days of history. Joxo Pro is $15 per person per month, or $12 per month billed yearly ($144); Business is $19 per seat per month, or $15 off a yearly plan, minimum 3 seats; Enterprise starts at $40 per seat per month, minimum 25 seats, with company sign-in, audit-log export and approval for every new computer. A founding price for the first 20 teams gives Pro at $8 and Business at $10 per seat for 12 months. Web purchases can be refunded within 30 days.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Notion](https://openaitools.app/tool/t) | 173,441,670 | +0.1% | Freemium | The AI workspace where teams and agents get work done together | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/t.md) |
| 2 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Google's agent-first development platform for building and shipping software with AI agents | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 3 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Enables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 4 | [VS Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code) | 7,397,370 | -3.8% | Freemium | Offers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code.md) |
| 5 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 6 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 7 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 8 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 9 | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) | 702,366 | -7.8% | Freemium | Delivers a polished AI-native IDE experience with multi-file generation, but has a smaller ecosystem than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md) |
| 10 | [Warp](https://openaitools.app/tool/warp-ai) | 657,372 | -9.3% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | AI-powered terminal and agentic software factory for development teams | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/warp-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/cursor-vs-joxo

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)