# Cursor vs Listo

Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Listo records 3,061 monthly visits with -71.5% growth and Contact for Pricing pricing.

| Metric | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | [Listo](https://openaitools.app/tool/listo) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.cursor.com | https://www.getlisto.io |
| Categories | AI Code Assistant, AI Developer Tools, AI Agent | AI Task Management |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Contact for Pricing |
| Monthly Visits | 23,297,751 | 3,061 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +8.4% | -71.5% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 14,683,770 | 1,204 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4 |
| Saved Count | 29 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Cursor

Cursor's editor looks familiar to anyone who has used a modern IDE, but the center of gravity is the agent. Instead of only suggesting the next line, it can read a task description, inspect the repository, produce an implementation plan, modify many files, run commands, and report back with a summary of what changed. Developers keep control by approving plans, reviewing diffs, and stepping in wherever judgment is needed.

The product has expanded well beyond a single application. Cloud agents can run on their own machines for extended periods, Cursor ships a CLI, and integrations bring the same agent into Slack and GitHub so work can be handed off without switching tools. A model picker lets you use frontier models from several providers, or rely on automatic selection per task.

This makes Cursor a good fit for teams that want measurable velocity gains on large codebases while keeping human review in the loop. The trade-offs are mostly about cost and process: capable agents consume quota, remote indexing raises questions for security-conscious organizations, and teams need light conventions for when to delegate versus write code directly.

**Pricing & Plans:** Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

- **Agent-driven code changes:** An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.
- **Cloud and parallel agents:** Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.
- **Tab completion and codebase context:** Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.
- **Multi-model flexibility:** Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.
- **CLI, Slack and GitHub workflows:** Run Cursor from the terminal, chat with it in Slack, and let it review or open pull requests in GitHub without leaving your workflow.

**Strengths:** Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits; Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub; Choose from multiple frontier models in one place; Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors

**Limitations:** Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage; Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively; Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly; Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md)

## Listo

Listo is built for the people who run premium hospitality inside large venues — suite managers, F&B directors, concession operators, and the IT teams that support them. Rather than stitching together radios, phone calls, and paper logs, Listo gives each part of the operation one shared system: guests request service from a suite tablet or a QR page, attendants receive the request on a watch and close it out, and managers watch open requests, ownership, and response times in a live dashboard.

The platform ships as five modular solutions. Premium Guest Experience connects suite and club guests to service staff. Mobile Order & Pay lets guests browse a menu and pay from their own phone with no app download, including pre-orders for suites and groups. Inventory & Restocking replaces phone calls and paper logs with digital restock requests routed to a prioritized warehouse queue. Staff Check-In swaps paper sign-in for NFC tap-in with an assigned location, and Labor Visibility shows where staff are working right now so they can be relocated mid-event and compared against productivity afterward.

Listo is deployed across stadiums, arenas, amphitheaters, hotels and resorts, casinos, and multi-venue concessionaires. Published customer stories describe sub-five-minute suite service response at TD Garden, roughly 70% less critical downtime on game day at American Family Field, and revenue lifts from cabana service and retail-style service use cases. The vendor reports 4.6 on Trustpilot and 5.0 on G2 with day-one onboarding.

**Pricing & Plans:** Listo does not publish list pricing; plans are quoted per venue after a demo. Book a demo to request a quote. A free trial is not advertised.

- **Premium Guest Experience:** Guests request service from a branded suite tablet or QR page; the request routes to the right attendant's watch and closes out when handled, so managers can see response and completion times.
- **Mobile Order & Pay:** Guests scan a QR code to browse the venue menu, order, and pay from their own phone with no app to install. Suites and groups can pre-order before the event.
- **Inventory & Restocking:** Stands submit restock requests in a few taps, the warehouse works one prioritized queue, and every request shows who owns it and when it was delivered.
- **Staff Check-In:** Employees tap an NFC card at a shared tablet and immediately see where to report; managers get a live record of arrivals and assigned locations before doors open.
- **Labor Visibility:** A real-time view of where every staff member is working, with relocation tracking and post-event comparison of hours against productivity by stand.

**Strengths:** Covers guest service, restocking, check-in, and labor in one platform instead of separate point tools; Watch-based attendant workflow and QR guest access need no app download for guests; Published venue case studies with concrete metrics (response time, downtime, revenue lift); Fast onboarding reported by customers, with strong Trustpilot and G2 ratings

**Limitations:** No public pricing, so budget planning requires a sales conversation; Value depends on venue size and event volume; small single-outlet operators may find it heavy; Guest-facing flows assume smartphones and venue Wi-Fi, which some venues cannot guarantee

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/listo.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Cursor and Listo compare in monthly traffic?

Cursor has 23,297,751 monthly visits, while Listo has 3,061. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Cursor has a month-over-month growth rate of +8.4%; Listo has -71.5%.

### How does pricing compare?

Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers. Listo: Contact for Pricing. Listo does not publish list pricing; plans are quoted per venue after a demo. Book a demo to request a quote. A free trial is not advertised.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 2 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Enables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 3 | [VS Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code) | 7,397,370 | -3.8% | Freemium | Offers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code.md) |
| 4 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 5 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 6 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 7 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 8 | [Vanta](https://openaitools.app/tool/vanta-com) | 931,152 | -18.8% | Contact for Pricing | Automated compliance, risk, and trust management powered by AI | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vanta-com.md) |
| 9 | [Trae](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae) | 702,366 | -7.8% | Freemium | Delivers a polished AI-native IDE experience with multi-file generation, but has a smaller ecosystem than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/trae.md) |
| 10 | [Warp](https://openaitools.app/tool/warp-ai) | 657,372 | -9.3% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | AI-powered terminal and agentic software factory for development teams | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/warp-ai.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/cursor-vs-listo

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)