How do their growth rates compare?

Cursor has a month-over-month growth rate of +8.4%; MATE: AI Code Review has —.

How does pricing compare?

Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers. MATE: AI Code Review: Free. Completely free. No subscription, no account, and no paid tier — all features are available immediately after installing the extension.

What are alternatives to Cursor and MATE: AI Code Review?

Other tools in related categories include Google Antigravity, Replit, VS Code, Qoder, Kiro.

Head-to-Head Benchmark

Cursor vs MATE: AI Code Review

Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. MATE: AI Code Review records 0 monthly visits with — growth and Free pricing.

CursorFreemiumTraffic Leader

The AI coding agent for building ambitious software

Monthly Visits

23.3M

MoM Velocity

+8.4%

Top Market

🇺🇸 United States

View Cursor Analysis

cursor.com

MATE: AI Code ReviewFree

Free AI code reviews, right inside your GitHub files

Monthly Visits

0

MoM Velocity

—

Top Market

🌐 Global

View MATE: AI Code Review Analysis chromewebstore.google.com

Side-by-Side Traffic & Specification Matrix

Dimension / Metric	Cursor	MATE: AI Code Review
Official Domain	cursor.com	chromewebstore.google.com
Pricing Model	Freemium	Free
Monthly Visits	23.3M (23,297,751)	0 (0)

MoM Traffic Delta	+1.8M (+8.4%)	0 (—)

Primary Market & Share	🇺🇸 United States (24.1%)	🌐 Global (—)

Direct Visits / mo	14.68M	0

User Rating	4.7	4.5

Supported Platforms	Website	Browser Extension

Cursor

The AI coding agent for building ambitious software

Agent-driven code changes

An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.

Cloud and parallel agents

Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.

Tab completion and codebase context

Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.

Multi-model flexibility

Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.

Strengths & Pros

+Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits
+Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub
+Choose from multiple frontier models in one place
+Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors
+Enterprise controls and broad adoption at large companies

Frequently Asked Questions: Cursor vs MATE: AI Code Review

Cursor has 23,297,751 monthly visits, while MATE: AI Code Review has 0. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

More Head-to-Head Matchups

Cursor vs Google Antigravity

39.35M visits/mo

Google Antigravity vs MATE: AI Code Review

16.05M visits/mo

Cursor vs Replit

33.31M visits/mo

MATE: AI Code Review vs Replit

10.02M visits/mo

Cursor vs VS Code

30.7M visits/mo

MATE: AI Code Review vs VS Code

7.4M visits/mo

Best Alternatives to Cursor & MATE: AI Code Review (12)

Limitations

–Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage
–Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively
–Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly
–Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

MATE: AI Code Review

Free AI code reviews, right inside your GitHub files

One-click AI review

A single button on GitHub file pages sends your code to the AI reviewer and returns feedback in seconds.

GitHub-native integration

Runs directly where you already read code, so there is no copy-pasting into a separate chat or dashboard.

Mentorship-style feedback

Suggestions explain reasoning and best practices, helping developers learn rather than just patching issues.

Completely free

All features are unlocked from install with no paywall, credit system, or trial period.

Strengths & Pros

+Free with no account or credit limits
+Works inside GitHub, so no context switching
+Fast, near-instant feedback on a single file
+Beginner-friendly mentorship framing

Limitations

–Chrome only — no Firefox, Safari, or IDE version

–Reviews one file at a time rather than an entire pull request

–Small user base and modest update history

01

Google Antigravity

16.1M/mo

Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor.

AI AgentFreemium+8.1%

Screenshot of the Google Antigravity site showing downloads and agent product surfaces

02

Replit

10M/mo

SpecialistEnables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories.

AI App BuilderFreemium, Paid61% direct

Replit agent generating a working web application from a prompt

#2

03

VS Code

7.4M/mo

Free / Open-sourceWrite code with precision, hand bigger jobs to agents, and keep working from anywhere

AI Code AssistantFreemium29% direct

Screenshot of VS Code with an agent session planning changes and a diff view for review

04

Qoder

5.1M/mo

Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows.

AI Code AssistantFreemium, Free Trial, Free+81.8%

Qoder IDE showing an active coding agent editing files and planning tasks

05

Kiro

3.3M/mo

Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor.

AI Code AssistantFreemium+4.6%

Kiro IDE showing a spec-driven agent session with plan, build, and review steps

06

Devin

2.5M/mo

SpecialistOperates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor.

AI Code AssistantPaid+1%

Devin session view with task list, parallel agents, and a generated pull request

07

Command Code

2.4M/mo

The coding agent that learns your coding taste

AI Code AssistantFreemium, Contact for Pricing74% direct

Command Code CLI showing an agent editing files and running tests

08

CodeRabbit

1M/mo

AI code review, PR triage, and security monitoring for fast-moving teams

AI Code ReviewFreemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing+4.6%

CodeRabbit review comment on a pull request alongside the triage board

09

Trae

702.4K/mo

Delivers a polished AI-native IDE experience with multi-file generation, but has a smaller ecosystem than Cursor.

AI Code AssistantFreemium53% direct

Trae agent applying a multi-file code change with a reviewable diff in the editor

10

Warp

657.4K/mo

SpecialistAI-powered terminal and agentic software factory for development teams

AI Code AssistantFreemium, Contact for Pricing38% direct

Warp platform view with factories-as-code YAML configuration and agent run status panel

11

ERNIE Comate

503.3K/mo

Baidu's ERNIE-powered AI coding partner for your IDE

AI Code AssistantFreemium8% direct

Screenshot of ERNIE Comate generating code and unit tests inside an IDE

12

Augment Code

326.2K/mo

Excels at enterprise-grade context engines and team workflows, but is heavier to set up than Cursor.

AI AgentFreemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing+24.1%

Screenshot of Augment Code code review agent posting inline findings on a pull request

#1

Visit

Google Antigravity

16.1M/mo+8.1%

Official

Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor.

AI Agent27% direct

Freemium

Visit

Replit

10M/mo

Official

SpecialistEnables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories.

AI App Builder61% direct

Freemium, Paid

#3

Visit

VS Code

7.4M/mo

Open Source

Free / Open-sourceWrite code with precision, hand bigger jobs to agents, and keep working from anywhere

AI Code Assistant29% direct

Freemium

Visit

Qoder

5.1M/mo+81.8%

Official

Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows.

AI Code Assistant49% direct

Freemium, Free Trial, Free

Visit

Kiro

3.3M/mo+4.6%

Official

Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor.

AI Code Assistant54% direct

Freemium

Visit

Devin

2.5M/mo+1%

Official

SpecialistOperates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor.

AI Code Assistant54% direct

Paid

Visit

Command Code

2.4M/mo

The coding agent that learns your coding taste

AI Code Assistant74% direct

Freemium, Contact for Pricing

Visit

CodeRabbit

1M/mo+4.6%

Official

AI code review, PR triage, and security monitoring for fast-moving teams

AI Code Review32% direct

Freemium, Free Trial, Paid, Contact for Pricing

Visit

Trae

702.4K/mo

Official

Delivers a polished AI-native IDE experience with multi-file generation, but has a smaller ecosystem than Cursor.

AI Code Assistant53% direct

Freemium

Visit

Warp

657.4K/mo

Official

SpecialistAI-powered terminal and agentic software factory for development teams

AI Code Assistant38% direct

Freemium, Contact for Pricing

Visit

ERNIE Comate

503.3K/mo

Official

Baidu's ERNIE-powered AI coding partner for your IDE

AI Code Assistant8% direct

Freemium

Visit

Augment Code

326.2K/mo+24.1%

Excels at enterprise-grade context engines and team workflows, but is heavier to set up than Cursor.

AI Agent42% direct

Freemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing

Cursor vs MATE: AI Code Review

Side-by-Side Traffic & Specification Matrix

Cursor

Strengths & Pros

Frequently Asked Questions: Cursor vs MATE: AI Code Review

How do Cursor and MATE: AI Code Review compare in monthly traffic?

How do their growth rates compare?

How does pricing compare?

What are alternatives to Cursor and MATE: AI Code Review?

More Head-to-Head Matchups

Best Alternatives to Cursor & MATE: AI Code Review (12)

Limitations

MATE: AI Code Review

Strengths & Pros

Limitations