# Cursor vs Selects

Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Selects records 66,160 monthly visits with -23.9% growth and Freemium, Paid pricing.

| Metric | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | [Selects](https://openaitools.app/tool/selects) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.cursor.com | https://cutback.video/selects |
| Categories | AI Code Assistant, AI Developer Tools, AI Agent | AI Video Editor, AI Video Search, AI Video Summarizer |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium, Paid |
| Monthly Visits | 23,297,751 | 66,160 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +8.4% | -23.9% |
| Primary Market | United States | United States |
| Direct Visits | 14,683,770 | 26,355 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| Saved Count | 29 | 1 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Cursor

Cursor's editor looks familiar to anyone who has used a modern IDE, but the center of gravity is the agent. Instead of only suggesting the next line, it can read a task description, inspect the repository, produce an implementation plan, modify many files, run commands, and report back with a summary of what changed. Developers keep control by approving plans, reviewing diffs, and stepping in wherever judgment is needed.

The product has expanded well beyond a single application. Cloud agents can run on their own machines for extended periods, Cursor ships a CLI, and integrations bring the same agent into Slack and GitHub so work can be handed off without switching tools. A model picker lets you use frontier models from several providers, or rely on automatic selection per task.

This makes Cursor a good fit for teams that want measurable velocity gains on large codebases while keeping human review in the loop. The trade-offs are mostly about cost and process: capable agents consume quota, remote indexing raises questions for security-conscious organizations, and teams need light conventions for when to delegate versus write code directly.

**Pricing & Plans:** Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

- **Agent-driven code changes:** An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.
- **Cloud and parallel agents:** Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.
- **Tab completion and codebase context:** Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.
- **Multi-model flexibility:** Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.
- **CLI, Slack and GitHub workflows:** Run Cursor from the terminal, chat with it in Slack, and let it review or open pull requests in GitHub without leaving your workflow.

**Strengths:** Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits; Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub; Choose from multiple frontier models in one place; Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors

**Limitations:** Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage; Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively; Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly; Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md)

## Selects

Selects approaches AI editing differently from transcript-only tools. It analyses the actual picture along with the audio, so it can identify shots, faces, speakers and the strongest takes, then builds an edit around what was really filmed rather than only what was said. You can ask for a three-minute highlight that stays on whoever is talking, or tell it to cut the ums and dead air while you keep looking for the right folder.

A standout capability is 'match any edit'. Paste a link to a video whose pacing, cuts, captions and effects you admire, drop in your own footage, and Selects rebuilds that style around your content. It also handles multicam projects by syncing every angle and microphone and automatically switching to the active speaker, plus auto captions in multiple languages, motion graphics generated from a sentence and AI-generated b-roll, images, voiceover and music.

Selects is not a walled garden. Results open on a genuine multi-track timeline for manual fixes, and finished work can be handed off to Adobe Premiere, Final Cut Pro, DaVinci Resolve or Avid Media Composer. It also exposes automation for AI agents, including integrations referenced with Claude and Codex, so developers can trigger edits programmatically.

**Pricing & Plans:** Selects has a genuinely free tier that covers multi-track timeline editing, export, captions, transitions, effects, templates and motion graphics with no credit card required. Paid plans are credit-based: Starter at $20/month (or $16/month billed yearly) for solo creators, Pro at $100/month ($80 yearly), Pro Max and a Team plan at $1,000/month ($800 yearly) for studios with shared credits, central billing and advanced data privacy. Top-up credits are available on paid tiers, and an Enterprise tier offers custom limits.

- **Edit by talking:** Describe the result you want in everyday language — pacing, framing, captions — and Selects performs the edit, letting you keep giving notes the way you would to a human editor.
- **Match any edit:** Paste a link to a reference video, add your own footage, and Selects recreates the cuts, pacing, captions and effects of that style around your content.
- **Multicam sync and auto switching:** Every camera angle and microphone is lined up automatically, and Selects knows who is speaking so it can cut between the right shots.
- **Visual understanding, not just transcripts:** Selects watches the footage — shots, faces, best takes — so edits are grounded in what was filmed, not only the spoken words.
- **Handoff to pro editing tools:** Open any result on a real timeline for manual tweaks, then export to Adobe Premiere, Final Cut Pro, DaVinci Resolve or Avid Media Composer.

**Strengths:** Chat-driven workflow removes the steep learning curve of traditional NLEs; Understands visuals and speakers, not just transcripts, so cuts land on the right shots; Reference-video matching reproduces a specific style around your own footage; Clean export path into Premiere, Final Cut, Resolve and Avid keeps pros in their existing pipeline

**Limitations:** Credit-based pricing for AI generation can be hard to forecast on heavy projects; Best results still depend on giving clear, detailed instructions; Advanced multicam and team features sit behind higher-priced tiers

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/selects.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Cursor and Selects compare in monthly traffic?

Cursor has 23,297,751 monthly visits, while Selects has 66,160. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Cursor has a month-over-month growth rate of +8.4%; Selects has -23.9%.

### How does pricing compare?

Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers. Selects: Freemium, Paid. Selects has a genuinely free tier that covers multi-track timeline editing, export, captions, transitions, effects, templates and motion graphics with no credit card required. Paid plans are credit-based: Starter at $20/month (or $16/month billed yearly) for solo creators, Pro at $100/month ($80 yearly), Pro Max and a Team plan at $1,000/month ($800 yearly) for studios with shared credits, central billing and advanced data privacy. Top-up credits are available on paid tiers, and an Enterprise tier offers custom limits.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [CapCut](https://openaitools.app/tool/capcut-com) | 54,700,686 | +13.2% | Freemium | All-in-one AI video generator, timeline editor, and Seedance 2.5 studio for creators and marketers. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/capcut-com.md) |
| 2 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 3 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Enables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 4 | [VS Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code) | 7,397,370 | -3.8% | Freemium | Offers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code.md) |
| 5 | [InVideo](https://openaitools.app/tool/invideo) | 6,893,591 | +4.6% | Freemium | Agentic online video editor with AI agents that cut, grade, and mix on a real timeline | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/invideo.md) |
| 6 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 7 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 8 | [Descript](https://openaitools.app/tool/descript) | 3,267,817 | +11.1% | Freemium, Paid | Edit video and podcasts by editing text | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/descript.md) |
| 9 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 10 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/cursor-vs-selects

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)