How do their growth rates compare?

Cursor has a month-over-month growth rate of +8.4%; Stakpak has -46.3%.

How does pricing compare?

Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers. Stakpak: Freemium. Open Source is free forever (Apache 2.0, bring your own keys). Hacker is $15/mo for 3 apps, Builder $45/mo for 10 apps, Team $450/mo for 50 apps with unlimited users, and Enterprise is custom. Extra apps cost $5/app/month and each paid tier bundles LLM Gateway credits.

What are alternatives to Cursor and Stakpak?

Other tools in related categories include Google Antigravity, Replit, VS Code, Qoder, Kiro.

Head-to-Head Benchmark

Cursor vs Stakpak

Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Stakpak records 633 monthly visits with -46.3% growth and Freemium pricing.

CursorFreemiumTraffic Leader

The AI coding agent for building ambitious software

Monthly Visits

23.3M

MoM Velocity

+8.4%

Top Market

🇺🇸 United States

View Cursor Analysis

cursor.com

StakpakFreemium

An open source agent that keeps your apps running while you sleep

Monthly Visits

633

MoM Velocity

-46.3%

Top Market

🇪🇬 Egypt

View Stakpak Analysis stakpak.dev

Side-by-Side Traffic & Specification Matrix

Dimension / Metric	Cursor	Stakpak
Official Domain	cursor.com	stakpak.dev
Pricing Model	Freemium	Freemium
Monthly Visits	23.3M (23,297,751)	633 (633)
MoM Traffic Delta

Primary Market & Share	🇺🇸 United States (24.1%)	🇪🇬 Egypt (100%)

Direct Visits / mo	14.68M	253

User Rating	4.7	4.6

Supported Platforms	Website	Website

Cursor

The AI coding agent for building ambitious software

Agent-driven code changes

An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.

Cloud and parallel agents

Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.

Tab completion and codebase context

Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.

Multi-model flexibility

Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.

Strengths & Pros

+Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits
+Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub
+Choose from multiple frontier models in one place
+Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors
+Enterprise controls and broad adoption at large companies

Frequently Asked Questions: Cursor vs Stakpak

Cursor has 23,297,751 monthly visits, while Stakpak has 633. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

More Head-to-Head Matchups

Cursor vs Google Antigravity

39.35M visits/mo

Google Antigravity vs Stakpak

Best Alternatives to Cursor & Stakpak (12)

Limitations

–Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage
–Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively
–Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly
–Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

Stakpak

An open source agent that keeps your apps running while you sleep

24/7 auto-healing

When a health check fails, the agent investigates — checking metrics, finding idle database connections, restarting the service, verifying the rollout — then posts a summary of what it did and how long it took.

Cloud cost watchdog

Scheduled scans surface idle RDS instances and orphaned EBS volumes, quantify the waste in a report and can recover meaningful monthly spend before finance notices.

Expiry and drift defence

Upcoming TLS expiries, stale secrets, deprecated APIs and end-of-life runtimes are caught and renewed ahead of time, with zero-downtime rollouts.

Single binary, runs on your machine

A single Rust binary installs as a system service and persists across reboots, combining scheduling, messaging and a local API. It works with Claude, GPT, Gemini and Mistral, or your own model running locally.

Strengths & Pros

+Genuinely open source (Apache 2.0) and runs entirely inside your own environment
+Real production risk controls: Cedar network sandbox, secret substitution and replayable audit logs
+One binary, no Kubernetes or control-plane sprawl to operate
+

Model-agnostic with a unified gateway or your own keys and local models

+Practical automation targets — incident response, cloud waste and expiring certificates

Limitations

–Autopilot adds a long-running agent process with real production access, so misconfigured triggers carry real risk
–Per-app subscription maths only makes sense once you manage several applications
–Setup requires comfort with a terminal, system services and IaC concepts
–The team is joining Vercel, so road-map and licensing direction may shift
–Managed features like the LLM Gateway push you toward a metered credit model

01

Google Antigravity

16.1M/mo

Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor.

AI AgentFreemium+8.1%

Screenshot of the Google Antigravity site showing downloads and agent product surfaces

02

Replit

10M/mo

SpecialistEnables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories.

AI App BuilderFreemium, Paid61% direct

Replit agent generating a working web application from a prompt

#2

03

VS Code

7.4M/mo

Free / Open-sourceOffers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing.

AI Code AssistantFreemium29% direct

Screenshot of VS Code with an agent session planning changes and a diff view for review

04

Qoder

5.1M/mo

Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows.

AI Code AssistantFreemium, Free Trial, Free+81.8%

Qoder IDE showing an active coding agent editing files and planning tasks

05

Kiro

3.3M/mo

Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor.

AI Code AssistantFreemium+4.6%

Kiro IDE showing a spec-driven agent session with plan, build, and review steps

06

Devin

2.5M/mo

SpecialistOperates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor.

AI Code AssistantPaid+1%

Devin session view with task list, parallel agents, and a generated pull request

07

Command Code

2.4M/mo

Free / Open-sourceThe coding agent that learns your coding taste

AI Code AssistantFreemium, Contact for Pricing74% direct

Command Code CLI showing an agent editing files and running tests

08

Browser Use

1.2M/mo

Free / Open-sourceBrowser agents and stealth cloud browsers for real web tasks

AI AgentFreemium, Paid, Contact for Pricing+41.1%

Browser Use agent diagram showing harness, stealth browser and task result

09

MyClaw

990.4K/mo

Your always-on AI teammate, hosted and managed for you

AI AssistantPaid8% direct

MyClaw pricing page listing Pro, Max and ULTRA managed agent hosting plans

10

Trae

702.4K/mo

Delivers a polished AI-native IDE experience with multi-file generation, but has a smaller ecosystem than Cursor.

AI Code AssistantFreemium53% direct

Trae agent applying a multi-file code change with a reviewable diff in the editor

11

Warp

657.4K/mo

SpecialistAI-powered terminal and agentic software factory for development teams

AI Code AssistantFreemium, Contact for Pricing38% direct

Warp platform view with factories-as-code YAML configuration and agent run status panel

12

Augment Code

326.2K/mo

Excels at enterprise-grade context engines and team workflows, but is heavier to set up than Cursor.

AI AgentFreemium, Free Trial, Contact for Pricing+24.1%

Screenshot of Augment Code code review agent posting inline findings on a pull request

#1

Visit

Google Antigravity

16.1M/mo+8.1%

Official

Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor.

AI Agent27% direct

Freemium

Visit

Replit

10M/mo

Official

SpecialistEnables instant cloud-based full-stack app building from natural language, but is less suited for local offline repositories.

AI App Builder61% direct

Freemium, Paid

#3

Visit

VS Code

7.4M/mo

Open Source

Free / Open-sourceOffers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing.

AI Code Assistant29% direct

Freemium

Visit

Qoder

5.1M/mo+81.8%

Official

Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows.

AI Code Assistant49% direct

Freemium, Free Trial, Free

Visit

Kiro

3.3M/mo+4.6%