# Cursor vs Suna (Kortix CompanyOS)

Cursor records 23,297,751 monthly visits with +8.4% month-over-month growth and Freemium pricing. Suna (Kortix CompanyOS) records 0 monthly visits with 0% growth and Freemium pricing.

| Metric | [Cursor](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor) | [Suna (Kortix CompanyOS)](https://openaitools.app/tool/suna) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Website URL | https://www.cursor.com | https://www.suna.so |
| Categories | AI Code Assistant, AI Developer Tools, AI Agent | AI Agent, AI Assistant, AI Research Tool, AI For Data Analytics |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Monthly Visits | 23,297,751 | 0 |
| MoM Growth Rate | +8.4% | 0% |
| Primary Market | United States | Global |
| Direct Visits | 14,683,770 | 0 |
| Review Score | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Saved Count | 29 | 0 |
| Supported Platforms | Website | Website |

## Cursor

Cursor's editor looks familiar to anyone who has used a modern IDE, but the center of gravity is the agent. Instead of only suggesting the next line, it can read a task description, inspect the repository, produce an implementation plan, modify many files, run commands, and report back with a summary of what changed. Developers keep control by approving plans, reviewing diffs, and stepping in wherever judgment is needed.

The product has expanded well beyond a single application. Cloud agents can run on their own machines for extended periods, Cursor ships a CLI, and integrations bring the same agent into Slack and GitHub so work can be handed off without switching tools. A model picker lets you use frontier models from several providers, or rely on automatic selection per task.

This makes Cursor a good fit for teams that want measurable velocity gains on large codebases while keeping human review in the loop. The trade-offs are mostly about cost and process: capable agents consume quota, remote indexing raises questions for security-conscious organizations, and teams need light conventions for when to delegate versus write code directly.

**Pricing & Plans:** Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers.

- **Agent-driven code changes:** An agentic mode that plans changes, edits several files at once, runs tests, and iterates until the task is complete.
- **Cloud and parallel agents:** Background agents spin up their own environments to build, test, and demo features in parallel, then hand back results for review.
- **Tab completion and codebase context:** Fast inline suggestions plus codebase-wide semantic search and indexing so answers reflect your actual repository.
- **Multi-model flexibility:** Switch between leading frontier models from multiple providers, or let Cursor select a model automatically for each task.
- **CLI, Slack and GitHub workflows:** Run Cursor from the terminal, chat with it in Slack, and let it review or open pull requests in GitHub without leaving your workflow.

**Strengths:** Strong repository-wide context and multi-file edits; Agent runs in the editor, cloud, CLI, Slack, and GitHub; Choose from multiple frontier models in one place; Familiar IDE experience for developers coming from other editors

**Limitations:** Requires a paid plan for the most capable models and higher usage; Learning curve to use agentic workflows effectively; Heavy cloud agent usage can consume plan quota quickly; Codebase indexing sends code to remote services, which some compliance teams must review

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/cursor.md)

## Suna (Kortix CompanyOS)

Suna started as an open-source answer to hosted generalist agents: give it a goal, and it plans, browses, codes and delivers. The project is still alive and is now presented as Kortix CompanyOS, an open-source "operating system for your company" where a workspace is backed by a git repository and every agent is a file rather than a black box. Agents, skills, rules, connectors and triggers are declared in a versioned kortix.yaml, so the way your company automates work is reviewable, forkable and portable.

The execution model is the distinctive part. Every session boots an isolated Linux cloud computer (default 2 vCPU / 4 GB / 20 GB) with your repo and tools already installed, on its own git branch named after the session. The agent can install packages, run commands, scrape pages and break things inside that machine; only what it commits survives, because the sandbox is destroyed afterwards. Agents run on your own model keys, a connected ChatGPT subscription, or Kortix-managed models, and the same project can be self-hosted on one Docker Compose stack or run on the managed cloud.

Because it is open source, the honest trade-off is operator burden: policies for allow / ask / block are not switched on for you, a workspace with no declared policy runs every action, and self-hosting means you own the compute and model bills. The team reports SOC 2 Type I, GDPR operation, SAML SSO and SCIM on Enterprise, and a design that keeps connector credentials server-side.

**Pricing & Plans:** Freemium. Free is $0 with 500 credits a month on your first workspace, no card, and you can bring your own API key or connect a ChatGPT subscription. Paid credit tiers run from $50/month (5,000 credits) to $50,000/month (5,000,000 credits), members are free and unlimited with one shared pool, and unused monthly credits roll over one month. Enterprise adds SSO, SCIM, RBAC, audit logs and cloud / VPC / on-prem deployment at custom pricing. 1 credit = $0.01 and buys roughly 5 minutes of agent computer time.

- **Agents on isolated cloud computers:** Every session spins up its own Linux machine with your repository and tools preinstalled, on a matching git branch. The sandbox is destroyed when the session ends, so only committed work persists.
- **Company-as-code repository:** A single kortix.yaml declares agents, skills, tools, connectors, policies and cron or webhook triggers, so your automation is versioned, diffable and portable between workspaces.
- **Broad tool and model connectivity:** Connect thousands of apps plus MCP, OpenAPI and raw HTTP endpoints, and route model calls through your own API keys, a ChatGPT subscription or managed providers such as DeepSeek, GLM and Kimi.
- **Multiplayer workspace:** Teams share one set of agents, skills, memory and connectors, and can start sessions from the web app, desktop, mobile, Slack or Microsoft Teams with roles, groups and per-resource permissions.
- **Open source and self-hostable:** The full stack is open source and can run on the managed cloud, in your own VPC or on-prem, with per-project secret encryption, SSO, SCIM and an audit trail of every agent and human action.

**Strengths:** Open source under your control, with no vendor lock-in on models or deployment; Each session gets a real isolated computer, so agents can install, run and test code safely; Everything the company automates lives in a git repo that can be cloned, reviewed and forked; Unlimited free members on one shared credit pool, so seats never drive the bill

**Limitations:** Credits pay for compute per second, so long-running or always-on agents can consume budget quickly; Safety policies are opt-in: a workspace with nothing declared will let agents run every action; Self-hosting shifts compute and model bills to you and keeps the instance reachable for sandboxes; The move from per-seat plans to credits, plus the Suna-to-Kortix rebrand, means older docs and tutorials may not match current pricing

[Profile (Markdown)](https://openaitools.app/tool/suna.md)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### How do Cursor and Suna (Kortix CompanyOS) compare in monthly traffic?

Cursor has 23,297,751 monthly visits, while Suna (Kortix CompanyOS) has 0. Traffic estimates describe audience size, not product quality.

### How do their growth rates compare?

Cursor has a month-over-month growth rate of +8.4%; Suna (Kortix CompanyOS) has 0%.

### How does pricing compare?

Cursor: Freemium. Cursor uses a freemium model: you can start for free with limited usage, then move to paid Pro, team, and enterprise tiers that unlock higher model limits, cloud agents, and administrative controls. Exact seats and credit allowances change over time, so check cursor.com/pricing for current numbers. Suna (Kortix CompanyOS): Freemium. Freemium. Free is $0 with 500 credits a month on your first workspace, no card, and you can bring your own API key or connect a ChatGPT subscription. Paid credit tiers run from $50/month (5,000 credits) to $50,000/month (5,000,000 credits), members are free and unlimited with one shared pool, and unused monthly credits roll over one month. Enterprise adds SSO, SCIM, RBAC, audit logs and cloud / VPC / on-prem deployment at custom pricing. 1 credit = $0.01 and buys roughly 5 minutes of agent computer time.

## Alternatives

| # | Tool Name | Monthly Visits | MoM Growth Rate | Pricing Model | Summary | Profile (Markdown) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 1 | [Google Antigravity](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity) | 16,054,109 | +8.1% | Freemium | Provides powerful parallel AI coding agents via a desktop command center, but is less integrated into a traditional editor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/google-antigravity.md) |
| 2 | [Replit](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit) | 10,016,437 | -7.7% | Freemium, Paid | Describe your idea and Replit builds a working app in minutes | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/replit.md) |
| 3 | [VS Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code) | 7,397,370 | -3.8% | Freemium | Offers unmatched extension support and official Copilot integration, but lacks Cursor's out-of-the-box deep codebase indexing and agentic editing. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/vs-code.md) |
| 4 | [Qoder](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder) | 5,145,040 | +81.8% | Freemium, Free Trial, Free | Features advanced multi-file planning and codebase reading, but lacks Cursor's smooth chat-to-edit inline workflows. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/qoder.md) |
| 5 | [Hermes-Agent](https://openaitools.app/tool/hermes-agent-1) | 3,638,741 | -5.4% | Freemium | A free, open-source personal AI agent that learns your projects and works across every messaging app. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/hermes-agent-1.md) |
| 6 | [Kiro](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro) | 3,330,476 | +4.6% | Freemium | Focuses on spec-driven engineering and structured agent planning, but offers less fluid ad-hoc inline code generation than Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/kiro.md) |
| 7 | [Devin](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin) | 2,549,346 | +1% | Paid | Operates as a fully autonomous software engineer for complex tasks, but lacks the snappy interactive inline editing of Cursor. | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/devin.md) |
| 8 | [Command Code](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code) | 2,358,177 | -12.1% | Freemium, Contact for Pricing | The coding agent that learns your coding taste | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/command-code.md) |
| 9 | [Clawdbot (OpenClaw)](https://openaitools.app/tool/clawdbot) | 1,903,068 | -25.4% | Paid, Free | Open-source personal AI assistant that runs on your own machine and works from chat apps | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/clawdbot.md) |
| 10 | [Orca](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca) | 1,025,891 | +1% | Free, Open Source, Enterprise on request | Run many coding agents in parallel, each in its own worktree | [.md](https://openaitools.app/tool/orca.md) |

---
Source: https://openaitools.app/compare/cursor-vs-suna

More Markdown: [Categories](https://openaitools.app/categories.md) · [Traffic rankings](https://openaitools.app/rankings.md) · [llms.txt](https://openaitools.app/llms.txt)